| | |
Bruce Schneier busts open the transparent society privacy myth
Bruce Schneier is a security legend, and posts like this one go a long way to proving just why. In this Wired commentary Schneier gives the best explanation I have seen as to why the ‘transparent society’ argument is a myth, why it is not better than privacy but rather equates to no privacy at all. Schneier argues that you cannot evaluate the value of privacy and disclosure unless you account for the relative power levels of the discloser and the disclosee.
Similar Threads
- HiJack This Log-Frequent freezing busts (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- Greetings from Bruce (Community Introductions)
- News Story: Linux fanboys should feel the force, says Schneier (Network Security)
- myth or truth? (Windows Software)
- The role of Females in society... (Geeks' Lounge)
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Tag cloud for privacy, security
adobe antivirus apple attack blackhat botnet browser business cable cellphone crime cybercrime daniweb data database dataloss development dns domains email encryption exploit facebook firefox flash forensic fraud gmail google government hack hacker hacking hardware idtheft internet iphone kaspersky law leopard linux mac macosx malware mcafee mckinnon microsoft mobile mozilla nasa nationalsecurity news obama os password passwords patch paypal payperclick pdf phishing politics privacy programming redhat report research scam search security socialnetworking software sophos spam spyware sql streetview strider survey symantec terrorism trademark trends trojan trust twitter uk usb virus vista vulnerability warning web webmail windows windows7 worm xp youtube zeroday




