| | |
Security by any other name
According to reports the general manager of Internet security with IBM has warned that "the security business has no future."
Speaking at the RSA conference in San Francisco, IT Pro says, Val Rahmani warned that the enterprise must fundamentally change security strategies if it is to have any success within the context of sustaining business.
It seems that IBM might have become tired of trying to keep on top of the latest security threats, the never ending cycle of success and failure that we are all too well aware of within the remit of attempting to fight the latest malware threats. Rahmani referred to this as an obsession with "fighting worms, trojans, viruses, insiders, outsiders, criminals, Martians. It's a futile pursuit" and is quoted as going on to add that "We keep rolling that boulder up the hill, and just when we think we've got there, along comes a new threat and we are starting all over again."
The answer to the problem would appear to be, at least according to IBM which just so happened to have acquired a dozen security companies during the last year alone, to focus on business sustainability instead.
Of course, business sustainability is really just security by another name. So that's OK then, and means that IBM can still spend the $1.5 billion that it has pledged this year on, err, security...
Speaking at the RSA conference in San Francisco, IT Pro says, Val Rahmani warned that the enterprise must fundamentally change security strategies if it is to have any success within the context of sustaining business.
It seems that IBM might have become tired of trying to keep on top of the latest security threats, the never ending cycle of success and failure that we are all too well aware of within the remit of attempting to fight the latest malware threats. Rahmani referred to this as an obsession with "fighting worms, trojans, viruses, insiders, outsiders, criminals, Martians. It's a futile pursuit" and is quoted as going on to add that "We keep rolling that boulder up the hill, and just when we think we've got there, along comes a new threat and we are starting all over again."
The answer to the problem would appear to be, at least according to IBM which just so happened to have acquired a dozen security companies during the last year alone, to focus on business sustainability instead.
Of course, business sustainability is really just security by another name. So that's OK then, and means that IBM can still spend the $1.5 billion that it has pledged this year on, err, security...
Similar Threads
- AVG not healing viruses + Security Alerts not recognising security software (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- Security, we don't need no steenkin security (Geeks' Lounge)
- Freeware Security VS Priced Security (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
advertising age amd apple avatar bluegene botnet broadband browser business cellphone censorship china chips copyright crime data database development dos downloads economy email encryption energy enterprise europe facebook firefox gadget games gaming google government hacker hacking hardware ibm ibm.news intelibm internet iphone ipod itunes law legal linux mac malware marketing medicine memory microsoft mobile mozilla music news openoffice opensource os pc phishing piracy politics porn privacy ps3 recession redhat report research russia search security sex socialnetworking software spam spyware sun supercomputer supercomputing survey technology trends trojan twitter ubuntu uk video virus vista web windows windows7 working x86 xbox yahoo youtube




