 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Windows on verge of collapse, says Gartner
0
•
•
•
•
Jbennet needs to make up his mind about what he thinks about Vista and stop having different 3p opinions every three days.
Vista is far from crap. It might not be the speed demon you seem to want, and it does have problems (depending on who you are), but it is still good imo. Vista should be to the Windows line similar to what 2000 was in it's era.
As for Linux...well I went through three different distros at work today trying to get some "linux" software to work on it, one of which even the installation failed. I must be pretty stupid.
Vista is far from crap. It might not be the speed demon you seem to want, and it does have problems (depending on who you are), but it is still good imo. Vista should be to the Windows line similar to what 2000 was in it's era.
As for Linux...well I went through three different distros at work today trying to get some "linux" software to work on it, one of which even the installation failed. I must be pretty stupid.
0
•
•
•
•
jbennet | Microsoft Fanboy
I believe you have not quite got it right:-
windows 98 = good.
Windows ME = crap
windows xp good
vista = crap
windows 7 = good ?
Should be:-
------------
Win 1.0 good start
Win 2.0 poor
Win3.0 better
Win3.1 good
Win95a poor
Win95b better
NT3 poor
NT4 good
windows 98 = better
windows 98SE = best (Still Good against later Windows issues, probably the best of all ).
If only we could get a 2008 SP for it.
Windows ME = poor (crap - something you do in a lavatory)
NT5 Win2000 Poor
NT5 Win2000Pro+SP4 Good
NT6 windows xp basic Very Poor (Given 'XP' was supposed to stand for 'Experience')
NT6 windows xp Higher editions +Sp3 Good
NT6 WinServer 2003 Good
NT7 vista = Poor (crap - something you do in a lavatory)
NT8 windows 7 = good ?
I believe you have not quite got it right:-
windows 98 = good.
Windows ME = crap
windows xp good
vista = crap
windows 7 = good ?
Should be:-
------------
Win 1.0 good start
Win 2.0 poor
Win3.0 better
Win3.1 good
Win95a poor
Win95b better
NT3 poor
NT4 good
windows 98 = better
windows 98SE = best (Still Good against later Windows issues, probably the best of all ).
If only we could get a 2008 SP for it.
Windows ME = poor (crap - something you do in a lavatory)
NT5 Win2000 Poor
NT5 Win2000Pro+SP4 Good
NT6 windows xp basic Very Poor (Given 'XP' was supposed to stand for 'Experience')
NT6 windows xp Higher editions +Sp3 Good
NT6 WinServer 2003 Good
NT7 vista = Poor (crap - something you do in a lavatory)
NT8 windows 7 = good ?
Similar Threads
- Navigation collapse and expand (JavaScript / DHTML / AJAX)
- Collapse Outside the frame (JavaScript / DHTML / AJAX)
- Text Collapse (JavaScript / DHTML / AJAX)
- News Story: Gartner Group suggests 2008 for Windows Vista (Upcoming News Stories)
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
You need to join our community in order to build your list of favorite forums. You can visit the forum index for a listing of all forums.
Related Forum Features
Latest Windows Vista and Windows 7 Posts
advertising age amd android apple avatar ballmer bluegene botnet browser business cellphone china chips console crime data database desktop development dos economy email energy enterprise facebook firefox games gaming google hacking hardware ibm ibm.news intel intelibm internet iphone ipod itunes law linux mac malware marketing medicine memory microsoft mobile mozilla music netbooks news nintendo novell office openoffice opensource operatingsystem operatingsystems os pc porn privacy ps3 recession redhat research russia search security sex socialnetworking software sony spam sun supercomputer supercomputing survey technology trends twitter ubuntu uk unix video virtualization virus vista web wii windows windows7 working x86 xbox xp yahoo youtube
