| | |
75 million reasons why QUAERO is no Google-killer
Please support our Pay-Per-Click Advertising advertiser: Get a Free Web Marketing Analysis!
Mark Furber, MD of a UK strategic online marketing company called NetCallidus, is warning anyone who might be listening that the publicly funded QUAERO European search engine research project is doomed to failure. Expensive failure at that: Furber says that the project, hyped as at the Euro equivalent of Google (don't we already have one of those, and it is called Google) will cost £75 million before vanishing into the ether. Something that Furber says is ridiculous as Internet technology will have significantly changed by 2013.
Some, of course, might accuse Furber of doing nothing more than a little strategic online marketing of his own company here with this press release. Certainly some of the claims made bear a little closer inspection. First there is the small matter of that money, European yes but not in the sense that everyone in Europe is contributing. It turns out that QUAERO was actually awarded £75 million by the French government, something the press release itself admits. Then there is the claim that "a publicly funded project like this has no chance of overtaking Google, even if that money was spent on development over one year, not five." The truth is, of course, that nobody could have predicted the rise to greatness in such a short period of time with Google itself. But it happened. Sure, the landscape is different today, but when it comes to Internet technologies anything is still possible, if not probable in this case. Furber insists that "the only way to create a viable European rival to Google is to use the money to fund research at one of its existing major rivals, such as Yahoo!."
However, the founders of the QUAERO project are equally insistent that it isn't a search engine, it isn't meant to be a Google killer at all. The 23 companies working together on QUAERO consider it to be a research co-operative that is investigating new search technologies that could be used by companies in the future. Which is a different kettle of fish as far as I am concerned, although a very expensive one at that.
Furber is having none of it though, concluding that "even if that is true, it doesn't matter. This project has no chance of producing anything useful for European businesses, and is a total waste of money."
Some, of course, might accuse Furber of doing nothing more than a little strategic online marketing of his own company here with this press release. Certainly some of the claims made bear a little closer inspection. First there is the small matter of that money, European yes but not in the sense that everyone in Europe is contributing. It turns out that QUAERO was actually awarded £75 million by the French government, something the press release itself admits. Then there is the claim that "a publicly funded project like this has no chance of overtaking Google, even if that money was spent on development over one year, not five." The truth is, of course, that nobody could have predicted the rise to greatness in such a short period of time with Google itself. But it happened. Sure, the landscape is different today, but when it comes to Internet technologies anything is still possible, if not probable in this case. Furber insists that "the only way to create a viable European rival to Google is to use the money to fund research at one of its existing major rivals, such as Yahoo!."
However, the founders of the QUAERO project are equally insistent that it isn't a search engine, it isn't meant to be a Google killer at all. The 23 companies working together on QUAERO consider it to be a research co-operative that is investigating new search technologies that could be used by companies in the future. Which is a different kettle of fish as far as I am concerned, although a very expensive one at that.
Furber is having none of it though, concluding that "even if that is true, it doesn't matter. This project has no chance of producing anything useful for European businesses, and is a total waste of money."
Similar Threads
- News Story: 850 million reasons why social networking is not dead (Growing an Online Community)
- The Google Killer Has Arrived. (Search Engine Optimization)
- Google's Exchange killer - why not? (Pay-Per-Click Advertising)
- News Story: Zune, the iPod killer? (Upcoming News Stories)
- possible memory killer...need info (Windows 95 / 98 / Me)
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
advertising age amd android apple avatar bing blogging bluegene botnet broadband browser business cellphone censorship china chips cloudcomputing copyright crime data database development dos downloads economy email energy enterprise europe facebook firefox games gaming gmail google government hacker hacking hardware ibm ibm.news intelibm internet iphone ipod itunes law legal linux mac malware marketing medicine memory microsoft mobile mozilla music news openoffice opensource os pc piracy porn privacy ps3 recession redhat research russia search security sex socialnetworking software spam statistics sun supercomputer supercomputing survey technology trends trojan twitter ubuntu uk video virus vista web windows windows7 working x86 xbox yahoo youtube




