| | |
RedHat's Patent Suit Settlement: Ill-Gotten Gain
RedHat settles its patent infringement lawsuit filed by Firestar Software and DataTern in Federal Court for an undisclosed amount. Part of the settlement that RedHat made was made on behalf of the Open Source Community--indemnifying users and its customers from future infringement suits by said parties.
RedHat's corporate opinion is that software patents spoil innovation and hinder new developments. Their opininon has not kept them out of the courtroom for patent infringement suits however. They are currently still involved in a patent suit with IP Innovations over 3 of its user interface patents.
Patent infringement is serious business and can reel in some major money for the damaged party's often near-empty coffers. I hate lawsuits and if a person or company has been truly damaged by an infringement; they are certainly due compensation for those damages. Many times, however, such lawsuits (and lawsuits in general) are usually just a desperate attempt at filling those coffers with ill-gotten gain.
If it were truly the principle of the thing or to truly seek justice, lawsuits would be aimed at whomever violated the patents, copyrights, or whatever--not just aimed at those with deep pockets. The fact that such suits are always aimed at deep-pocketed companies like RedHat, IBM, and Novell informs me otherwise. For once, I'd like to see some lawsuits launched against a non-profit organization that has no money just to send a message to offenders and not for any monetary gain.
I'll be here holding my breath till it happens.
RedHat's corporate opinion is that software patents spoil innovation and hinder new developments. Their opininon has not kept them out of the courtroom for patent infringement suits however. They are currently still involved in a patent suit with IP Innovations over 3 of its user interface patents.
Patent infringement is serious business and can reel in some major money for the damaged party's often near-empty coffers. I hate lawsuits and if a person or company has been truly damaged by an infringement; they are certainly due compensation for those damages. Many times, however, such lawsuits (and lawsuits in general) are usually just a desperate attempt at filling those coffers with ill-gotten gain.
If it were truly the principle of the thing or to truly seek justice, lawsuits would be aimed at whomever violated the patents, copyrights, or whatever--not just aimed at those with deep pockets. The fact that such suits are always aimed at deep-pocketed companies like RedHat, IBM, and Novell informs me otherwise. For once, I'd like to see some lawsuits launched against a non-profit organization that has no money just to send a message to offenders and not for any monetary gain.
I'll be here holding my breath till it happens.
Similar Threads
- Bulletproof Suit (Geeks' Lounge)
- Does Technology Suit Your Needs Truly? (Geeks' Lounge)
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
age amd apple avatar bbc bluegene browsers canonical centos chips cisco citrix cloudcomputing database debian dell desktop desktops developers development distributions dos economy energy enterprise fedora gadgets gnome google gos gpl hardware hp hyper-v ibm ibm.news intel intelibm itunes java kde kernel kvm laptop laptops law lawsuits linustorvalds linux linuxfoundation mac macosx medicine memory microsoft mobile netbook netbooks news novell open openoffice opensolaris opensource opensuse operatingsystem operatingsystems oracle os osx patents pc ps3 recession redhat russia sco security servers slackware software solaris source sun supercomputer supercomputing support suse technology trends ubuntu unix users virtualization vista vmware windows working x86 xen




