| | |
Broadband for everyone
Over in the UK the Government has issued what it's calling the Digital Britain Report. There has been a lot of reaction. Essentially the idea is that everyone should have broadband in their house by 2012 (just in time for us to underfund the Olympics) and, er...and they all live Happily Ever After.
There has been a lot of reaction (see the BBC's round-up for details and a PDF of the report itself). It's short on detail, there's no real strategy, the criticisms run.
My concern is elsewhere. Everybody is taking it for granted over here and elsewhere in the world that broadband coverage will increase, that it will get faster and it will be like running water eventually. There has been no thought given, as far as I can ascertain, to the cost and where the money for the infrastructure is going to come from. It won't have escaped anyone's attention that we're really not too well off at the moment in this place (by which I mean 'Planet Earth') - and yet nobody has noticed that taking improvements in a particular area for granted is glib in the extreme.
I hope I'm wrong. I hope the recession won't be as bad as, say, President Obama thinks (he says it's a disaster, but what does he know, in the job for a week and already he thinks he's an expert). But making sure we can all download movies a bit faster isn't going to be a priority in anybody's money.
There has been a lot of reaction (see the BBC's round-up for details and a PDF of the report itself). It's short on detail, there's no real strategy, the criticisms run.
My concern is elsewhere. Everybody is taking it for granted over here and elsewhere in the world that broadband coverage will increase, that it will get faster and it will be like running water eventually. There has been no thought given, as far as I can ascertain, to the cost and where the money for the infrastructure is going to come from. It won't have escaped anyone's attention that we're really not too well off at the moment in this place (by which I mean 'Planet Earth') - and yet nobody has noticed that taking improvements in a particular area for granted is glib in the extreme.
I hope I'm wrong. I hope the recession won't be as bad as, say, President Obama thinks (he says it's a disaster, but what does he know, in the job for a week and already he thinks he's an expert). But making sure we can all download movies a bit faster isn't going to be a priority in anybody's money.
Similar Threads
- mobile broadband (Networking Hardware Configuration)
- Very Slow Broadband Help Please (Windows 95 / 98 / Me)
- Wi-fi with BT Broadband (Networking Hardware Configuration)
- sky by broadband? (IT Professionals' Lounge)
- IE and Broadband Connection (Web Browsers)
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
3g 3gs advertising apple ban bigbrother british broadband bt business cap carbonfootprint censorship cern charts comcast consoles consumer data database digitalbritain ds ebay ecommerce england environment europe ev-do fairness fcc fibreoptic filesharing finance games gaming google government hacker hacking hardware hdtv homeworking hosting identity internet iphone isp jobs law limit map mapping mckinnon microsoft military mobile municipal music nasa nationalsecurity network neutrality news nintendo nuclear o2 onlineshopping philadelphia phorm police politics privacy queen royalty rural security server. shopping sms snow software speed spending streetview survey telecoms terrorist textmessaging uk verizon video videogame virgin web webdevelopment wifi wireless xbox xbox360 youtube




