| | |
Hold the front page: Piracy is not killing the music business!
Please support our eCommerce advertiser: Get a Free E-commerce Success Analysis!
If piracy and illegal downloaders really are killing the music industry, how come more singles have been sold this year than ever before and people who file-share spend more money on legal releases than those who do not file-share?
I have to admit, it's not been a good week to be on the side of law and order and the established way of things as far as the music business is concerned. While the UK Government pushes ever onwards with the Digital Economy Bill which promises a robust legal and regulatory framework to deal with illegal file-sharing, and continues to insist that illegal downloading is a real threat to the music industry, figures have been released which seem to undermine the official 'three strikes and your out' to save creative output position.
According to the Daily Mail a newly published study shows that, in the UK at least, those who download illegal music actually spend considerably more on buying legal music than those who do not admit to illegal downloading. When it comes to music singles and albums, the illegal downloaders spend an average of £77 per year on official releases while people who say they have never downloaded any music illegally spend only £44 per year.
Of those asked, around two thirds would stop downloading illegally if music download services were cheaper. Just reducing the cost to 45p a track could double the sales of legal downloads it would seem. Add to this the fact that 42% of people said they download illegally to try before they buy, and 83% insist they buy more music as a result of such downloading, and you get the feeling that the music industry needs to be examining new music distribution business models and exploiting them rather than applying the big stick with fingers in ears going la la la approach.
The British Phonographic Industry, the UK music industry trade association, reckons that illegal downloaders will cost the music biz around £200 million in lost sales by the end of this year. Yet at the same time it is being reported that the BPI is also saying that 2009 will be the biggest year ever as far as sales of singles in the UK is concerned. The previous record for most single records being sold was et, er, last year in fact. Even more proof, were it needed, that illegal downloads are simply not killing the music business as is constantly being suggested by the industry powers that be.
I have to admit, it's not been a good week to be on the side of law and order and the established way of things as far as the music business is concerned. While the UK Government pushes ever onwards with the Digital Economy Bill which promises a robust legal and regulatory framework to deal with illegal file-sharing, and continues to insist that illegal downloading is a real threat to the music industry, figures have been released which seem to undermine the official 'three strikes and your out' to save creative output position.
According to the Daily Mail a newly published study shows that, in the UK at least, those who download illegal music actually spend considerably more on buying legal music than those who do not admit to illegal downloading. When it comes to music singles and albums, the illegal downloaders spend an average of £77 per year on official releases while people who say they have never downloaded any music illegally spend only £44 per year.
Of those asked, around two thirds would stop downloading illegally if music download services were cheaper. Just reducing the cost to 45p a track could double the sales of legal downloads it would seem. Add to this the fact that 42% of people said they download illegally to try before they buy, and 83% insist they buy more music as a result of such downloading, and you get the feeling that the music industry needs to be examining new music distribution business models and exploiting them rather than applying the big stick with fingers in ears going la la la approach.
The British Phonographic Industry, the UK music industry trade association, reckons that illegal downloaders will cost the music biz around £200 million in lost sales by the end of this year. Yet at the same time it is being reported that the BPI is also saying that 2009 will be the biggest year ever as far as sales of singles in the UK is concerned. The previous record for most single records being sold was et, er, last year in fact. Even more proof, were it needed, that illegal downloads are simply not killing the music business as is constantly being suggested by the industry powers that be.
0
•
•
•
•
Sounds like a case of the right hand not knowing what the left hand is doing or reporting. So, it is a natural that government is involved.
0
•
•
•
•
I have an album available via torrent. That is to say an album by me, not one that I've bought, ripped and put on a torrent site. I like the idea of people being able to download it if they want to, even though the physical CD version is available for purchase. I would have the same view even if I was famous, and people should be able to make up their own minds about the music before having to pay for it.
If the government think that makes me a pirate, all I can say is 'Arr, matey!'
If the government think that makes me a pirate, all I can say is 'Arr, matey!'
0
•
•
•
•
Nice one Rebecca. I forget the name of the band, British band I think, that put there last album up on iTunes (I think) and let their fans pay what they felt it was worth. Good luck with the album.
0
•
•
•
•
I think you're referring to Radiohead's 'In Rainbows' album. It was a great marketing ploy for them, as it increased their exposure, which led to better sales when they released the CD version of the album.
As for my album, I just checked on the figures earlier today. Since the album was released last year, it's been downloaded 283 times, and I've sold one CD copy. I don't think that's bad considering I haven't paid a penny for marketing!
As for my album, I just checked on the figures earlier today. Since the album was released last year, it's been downloaded 283 times, and I've sold one CD copy. I don't think that's bad considering I haven't paid a penny for marketing!
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
adsense advertising amazon apple banking beatles bittorrent blog blogging blogs bomb book business centro commerce consumers copyright cybersquatting developer development digg digital directory domains downloads drm economy emi eu europe facebook filesharing finance free garthbrooks gartner google government hardware high-definition internet iphone ipod itunes jobs kitsound law linux london marketing media microsoft money movies mp3 mpaa music myspace napster news opensource p2p pandora payperclick peertopeer piracy piratebay politics publishing revenue riaa search security server sixapart skype small social socialmedia socialnetworking software speaker spotify strider stumbleupon support sweden technology trademark trust twitter typo-squatting uk wanted web windows windows7 yahoo yahoo! youtube




