Here you go. Added for loop in place of while, and commented out the i++ at end of while loop.
Also added int variable col, to print a newline every ten numbers printed to standard out.
#include<stdio.h>
#include<conio.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int count,i=1;
int a;
int col=0;
//while(i<=500)
for(i=1; i<501; i++)
{
count=0;
a=1;
while(a<=i)
{
if(i%a==0)
count++;
a++;
}
if(count==2){
printf("%d\t",i);
col++;
if(col%10==0)
printf("\n");
}
//i++;
}
system("PAUSE");
return 0;
}
hollystyles
Veteran Poster
1,188 posts since Feb 2005
Reputation Points: 262
Solved Threads: 68
Skill Endorsements: 0
> I make this program but with while loop then i was told to make it using for loop, which i tried but failed.
So turn
i = 0;
while ( i < 500 ) {
// do stuff
i++;
}
To
for ( i = 0 ; i < 500 ; i++ ) {
// do stuff
}
Salem
Posting Sage
11,531 posts since Dec 2005
Reputation Points: 5,875
Solved Threads: 953
Skill Endorsements: 27
DOH! Salem
Johns' while loop was: less than OR EQUAL to 500.
So change to for i < 501 NOT 500.
This is Johns' future your playing with, pay attention.
hollystyles
Veteran Poster
1,188 posts since Feb 2005
Reputation Points: 262
Solved Threads: 68
Skill Endorsements: 0
I didn't pay any attention to his program, it wasn't formatted with code tags.
All I did was illustrate the relationship between for loops and while loops, and how ridiculously easy it is to convert one into the other.
Salem
Posting Sage
11,531 posts since Dec 2005
Reputation Points: 5,875
Solved Threads: 953
Skill Endorsements: 27
> for(int j=2;j<i/2;j++) //since a no. cannot be divisible by a
> { //no. greater than its half.
It's square root of actually, but hey what the heck.
At least it's not the only mistake in your code.
Salem
Posting Sage
11,531 posts since Dec 2005
Reputation Points: 5,875
Solved Threads: 953
Skill Endorsements: 27
Ok here's my best shot. The key rule for a prime number is:
It has precisely two positive integer factors.
So the neatest solution I can think of counts those and quits the for loop as soon as it's found more than 2 or reached half way to n.
Can anyone better it?
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
static const int MAX = 500;
static const int MIN = 0;
static const int MAXCOL = 10;
bool isPrime(int r);
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int col = 0;
int n;
for(n=MIN; n<=MAX; n++)
if(isPrime(n)){
cout << n << '\t';
col++;
if(col == MAXCOL){
cout << '\n';
col = 0;
}
}
system("PAUSE");
return 0;
}
bool isPrime(int n)
{
if((n == 0)||(n == 1))
return false;
int factors = 2;
for(int i=2; i<=((int)n/2); i++){
if(n%i == 0){
factors++;
break;
}
}
if(factors == 2)
return true;
return false;
}
hollystyles
Veteran Poster
1,188 posts since Feb 2005
Reputation Points: 262
Solved Threads: 68
Skill Endorsements: 0
Ah it's just occured to me what Salem meant by square root !
A revised edition:
#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
static const int MAX = 500;
static const int MIN = 0;
static const int MAXCOL = 10;
bool isPrime(int r);
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int col = 0;
int n;
for(n=MIN; n<=MAX; n++)
if(isPrime(n)){
cout << n << '\t';
col++;
if(col == MAXCOL){
cout << '\n';
col = 0;
}
}
system("PAUSE");
return 0;
}
bool isPrime(int n)
{
if((n == 0)||(n == 1))
return false;
int factors = 2;
for(int i=2; i<=((int)sqrt((double)n)); i++){
if(n%i == 0){
factors++;
break;
}
}
if(factors == 2)
return true;
return false;
}
Now if only I could make i++ step in primes!
hollystyles
Veteran Poster
1,188 posts since Feb 2005
Reputation Points: 262
Solved Threads: 68
Skill Endorsements: 0
>can anyone better it?
Yes, there are more faster prime number finding Al-Gore-it-hims out there.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sieve_of_Atkin
Note I said faster as opposed to efficient. An efficient prime number list finding strategy would be rather elusive.
Also, I'm sure you can think of a much better way to pause the program than using system("PAUSE"); ?
:lol:
iamthwee
Posting Genius
6,254 posts since Aug 2005
Reputation Points: 1,567
Solved Threads: 476
Skill Endorsements: 34
Also, I'm sure you can think of a much better way to pause the program than using system("PAUSE"); ?
:lol:
Ok whats wrong with system("PAUSE") ?
I
hollystyles
Veteran Poster
1,188 posts since Feb 2005
Reputation Points: 262
Solved Threads: 68
Skill Endorsements: 0
> for(int i=2; i<=((int)sqrt((double)n)); i++)
And it would be so much quicker if you didn't call sqrt() on every iteration of the loop!
n is constant (in this function), so it's root is constant also. Calculate it once and store in another variable to compare against.
Also, since 2 is prime, that's an easy case to get rid of, and you can start at 3.
Also, if you start at 3, then you can do i+=2 to only check all the odd numbers from there on.
Salem
Posting Sage
11,531 posts since Dec 2005
Reputation Points: 5,875
Solved Threads: 953
Skill Endorsements: 27
Dude543 yes I like that very much.
Salem good feedback.
So system("PAUSE") then, what gives ? I havn't found anything negative on the internet yet.
Ok I've found it:
http://www.gidnetwork.com/b-61.html
hollystyles
Veteran Poster
1,188 posts since Feb 2005
Reputation Points: 262
Solved Threads: 68
Skill Endorsements: 0
Actually dud543 I think this is wrong: || n % 2 == 0) That would return false for 2 which is prime.
hollystyles
Veteran Poster
1,188 posts since Feb 2005
Reputation Points: 262
Solved Threads: 68
Skill Endorsements: 0
you can't edit a post more than 30 minutes after you posted in this forum.
0 and 1 are not prime. Yes 1 is divisible by 1 and itself, but that's the same thing it's only one factor not two factors so it's not prime.
2 is a special case, it is the only even number that is a prime.
hollystyles
Veteran Poster
1,188 posts since Feb 2005
Reputation Points: 262
Solved Threads: 68
Skill Endorsements: 0