Download Turbo C

[xponse]

I w'd like tom Download Turbo C (window version). Can any one sugget any site,

thank in advance :confused:

[andor]

Tried here ?

[xponse]

Previously I downloaded that ,, but it running on MS-Dos only, and also mose is not working when I tried to run on commandprompt

Any way thatk for your quick reply

[andor]

Well try to look harder. Try to find previous post about this topic. here like this

[WaltP]

Turbo 1.01
Turbo 2.01

[~s.o.s~]

Why not try something else which also supports "mouse" as you wanted:
Here is list of some free compilers and IDE which you may find really good and programmer friendly:

http://www.daniweb.com/techtalkforums/thread50370.html

Hope it helped, bye.

[sudhi_lv]

webcourse.cs.technion.ac.il/234112/Winter2004-2005/en/ho_Download%20Turbo-C.html -

[Ancient Dragon]

webcourse.cs.technion.ac.il/234112/Winter2004-2005/en/ho_Download%20Turbo-C.html -

Your link is just a tad late isn't it (by a year or so) ? :-O

[vishesh]

Well there is Turbo C++ Explorer 2006 , which is new and latest one.

But if you want older one(they do not support ANSI C++) then look for Turbo C++ 4.5. But no hopes to fine it easily. Also you could get Borland C++ 3.1(there is a window version in addition to DOS one) or 4x which is almost similer to Turbo C.

So all you could do is search with google, but with little hopes.

[ChaseVoid]

I w'd like tom Download Turbo C (window version). Can any one sugget any site, thank in advance :confused:

Well I'm also learning C. I tried the Turbo thingy, but it doesn't work that well. At our institute thy use GPP compiler, but it's real troublesome. I would suggest Visual Studio C++ Express edition. Just select Win32 Console Application and keep the wizard settings as it is. Manually rename your file to *.c and then go into it's properties. Configuration Properties > C/C++ > Precompiled Headers Then change the settings toCreate Precompiled Header (/Yc) And save it. In the program just include

#include "stdafx.h"

I know it may sound too much. but It works for me. Even if you don't do all this it'll still work. I mean you'll get the result. But the only problem I saw without doing all the above mentioned steps in that you get a lot of warning messages. There are also troubles using scanf fuction. so that's why.. ^^ best of luck

[TkTkorrovi]

Yes it sounds complicated, and any stdafx.h is not a standard c header, either. What is GPP? If you mean gcc, then why it's complicated? Use command line, gcc something.c -o something.exe (in mingw and cygwin) is all you need to compile a standard c program, nothing can be any simpler. A bit more complicated when you use graphics user interface like gtk, but it's not compiling what is complicated, maybe installing the libraries may be a trouble for some, though it's simple if to know a few simple things. It's better to use free open source and standard (posix) compiler gcc, than any non-standard ones, like visual c and borland c, gcc is an extremely good compiler as well, in some ways better than visual c, and can make as fast programs, or even faster.

[jbennet]

I would suggest Visual Studio C++ Express edition

That teaches you C++.NET not real C++

[Ancient Dragon]

That teaches you C++.NET not real C++

Wrong. It is a c and c++ compiler too and is fairly good at conforming to c++ standards. But I don't suggest it for beginners because the IDE is a little complicated to learn to use.

[jbennet]

Wrong. It is a c and c++ compiler too and is fairly good at conforming to c++ standards.

Not the express edition ?Create .NET Framework applications with advanced features such as data access, networking, and built-in printing support.
Build 32-bit native code applications designed for Windows using the Windows Platform SDK .

without the platform SDK it cant make standard Win32 apps, making it .NET only.

[Narue]

>Not the express edition ?
The C/C++ compiler is identical in all editions.

>without the platform SDK it cant make standard Win32 apps, making it .NET only.
Well, technically Win32 applications aren't "real" C++ either. Only standard C++ is "real", and you can write both standard C (C95) and standard C++ (for the most part) with the express edition. Don't trust the propaganda, Microsoft is trying to push their .NET framework.

[Ancient Dragon]

Not the express edition ? without the platform SDK it cant make standard Win32 apps, making it .NET only.

win32 apps are not the same thing as standard c++ programs. The Express edition compiles C and C++ with or without the Windows Platform SDK. If you want to write win32 api programs then you are right -- you have to also download the SDK.

[jbennet]

Okay i believe you (im a bit of a C noob)

[ChaseVoid]

Aww.. >< Don't ya think we are kinda moving out of the topic. LOL.. But weeeee, I was surprised at all the detailed replies, which got me hella confused. But still, I know what you mean that express editions does have a lot of limitations, but they are good for beginners who are just trying to learn.

To TkTkorrovi, Well gpp compiler is a part from djgpp, but I'm not sure. gcc is a different compiler, mostly for C++. gpp is old and has few limitations, like in the main you MUST have int as the return type irrespective of the actual return. I have no idea why, but yeah.

And I don't think it matters which compiler we use. I mean as long your getting the result, it's fine right. As, for difference between C++ or other languages to the .NET version, I don't know much about them, or what's the difference, but I guess even the old/original format of the code works, right. So what's the problem. Sorry I might be a novice, but I really don't understand why would you want to use a difficult lengthy process when you can use a small easy way. It really doesn't make much sense to me.

As for my preference for NOT liking command prompt compilers, well it's just that reading the errors and evaluating them becomes a real trouble, especially for novice or a doof head like me.. >.< kekeke.. So yeah

[Narue]

>like in the main you MUST have int as the return type irrespective of the actual return.
That's a language rule. The main function must return int. If you return anything else, and there's no implicit conversion, you've likely entered the realm of undefined behavior.

>And I don't think it matters which compiler we use.
As long as your compiler conforms to the standard you intend to follow, it doesn't matter.

[ChaseVoid]

Oh! I so didn't knew about that. So like in C programs, having "int" is a must? I mean like if we use turbo, or other compilers, I have noticed that void works good. But when we use it in GPP it gives out a lot of errors.

>>As long as your compiler conforms to the standard you intend to follow, it doesn't matter.

Yup yup totally.. as long as you get what you want.. ^^