943,793 Members | Top Members by Rank

Ad:
  • C++ Discussion Thread
  • Marked Solved
  • Views: 3354
  • C++ RSS
Apr 14th, 2008
0

Windows API - Use QT Now?

Expand Post »
I searched the forums for Windows API tutorials and have found this. Is it necessary to do everything manually like in the tutorial and after getting the hang of it move on to QT or should I jump into QT right now?
Last edited by DigitalPackrat; Apr 14th, 2008 at 2:11 pm.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 1
Light Poster
DigitalPackrat is offline Offline
33 posts
since Jan 2008
Apr 14th, 2008
0

Re: Windows API - Use QT Now?

I would work though the tutorial first to find out how things go. Then it will be easier to understand QT.
Sponsor
Team Colleague
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 5608
Solved Threads: 2282
Retired and Enjoying Life
Ancient Dragon is offline Offline
21,950 posts
since Aug 2005
Apr 14th, 2008
0

Re: Windows API - Use QT Now?

It might be worth reading, but I wouldn't spend too long on it.

Like learning asm when you're programming in C++. You don't need it, but if you know a few things, you'll have an appreciation of some of the finer points.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 5862
Solved Threads: 950
Posting Sage
Salem is offline Offline
7,164 posts
since Dec 2005
Apr 14th, 2008
0

Re: Windows API - Use QT Now?

Alright, so I would probably skim through the tutorial once.
Also, is QT the way to go, what are other options?
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 1
Light Poster
DigitalPackrat is offline Offline
33 posts
since Jan 2008
Apr 14th, 2008
0

Re: Windows API - Use QT Now?

Alright, so I would probably skim through the tutorial once.
Also, is QT the way to go, what are other options?
That depends on where you want to go.

If you intend to write only for Windoze, you can write at the API level or you can use the MFC components, and various libraries that support them. If you want to write for multiple platforms (ie., Linux and Mac OS/X) then QT or wxWidgets are popular tools - essentially write once, compile for the various target platforms.

If you intend to write commercial software, be sure to check the licensing - QT can be quite pricey, wxWidgets is not. Visual Studio, cheap to pricey, depending on the suite you get.

Programming at the WinAPI level, you can use any editor/compiler - it's just C/C++.
Reputation Points: 1268
Solved Threads: 228
Posting Virtuoso
vmanes is offline Offline
1,895 posts
since Aug 2007
Apr 14th, 2008
0

Re: Windows API - Use QT Now?

To echo vmanes, I recommend wxWidgets. It is simpler and easier to use than the WinAPI, and it is portable to other platforms. QT is nice, but there are license fees for use on Window. Also, take a look at GTK+, which is free and supported on Windows, Linux, and Mac.

The WinAPI is old and very low-level. All of the other toolkits are much higher level, more user friendly, more robust, etc.
Reputation Points: 18
Solved Threads: 2
Newbie Poster
eager is offline Offline
12 posts
since Jan 2008

This thread is solved

Either the thread starter or a moderator has marked this thread as solved. You can most likely trust the responses and answers given. There is most likely no reason for any further responses to be posted here. If you have a related question, please start a new thread in this forum instead.

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
Message:
Previous Thread in C++ Forum Timeline: getline failing to read from data file?
Next Thread in C++ Forum Timeline: Square root??





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC