Read a bit in the bookstore, didnt really sound that good to me, and everybody else agreed that it was not really a helpful book, in my opinion it isn't.
My point exactly, C++ is not that hard of a language to comprehend with and learn, but it takes more then 21 days to learn it, I am positive about it, and I saw the 24 hours one, 'em, not really so sure about it, literally I don't.
I think i'm a bit too late,but teach yourself C++ in 24 hours is something i woudn't recommend because you will know the sytax and everything but you wont know how to apply it,it take at least a month to learn a language be patient.The 21 days one is fine
My recommendation: Avoid those "Learn X Language in Y Time" books. If you really want to learn, you should be ready to spend a lot more than months to be "good" at it. Winrycool1 hit right in the nail: With those books, you will get the syntax but you will have no idea of how to use it.
Personally, I learned with a book I got years ago called "C++ Without Fear". It's not the best beginners book and it doesn't even have the best compiler included, but it did a good job teaching me basic C++ and how to apply those concepts. Granted, I had to read other books (and still am), but I think it set a good foundation on me to keep learning.
I actually read Learn C++ in 21 days. It was one of about 4 books I used to teach myself C++. Without naming the other books, 21 Days was the most helpful and seemed to cover more than the others. I also found myself a medium sized project to put into practice what I learned. There's no substitute for actual experience. As for your question, I would recommend 21 Days as a tutorial, but would also suggest reading a couple other books to supplement what you learn there.
No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.