I've seen that before when using MS-Access. If one of your field names is unknown, then MS-Access considers that field a parameter and generates this sort of error. It can also be another identifier, other than a field name, something that MS-Access cannot lookup.
Make your query as simple as you can, just select * from table and then add more in until you start getting the error. Or perhaps print out your query/insert and try it directly in MS-Access itself.
JeffHeaton
Junior Poster in Training
58 posts since Jul 2005
Reputation Points: 12
Solved Threads: 0
" dont know y its giving me this error. All the parameters r correct. Can any 1 help me. Im developing a container tracking system for a company. I have worked with Java and Oracle. This is my first time with Java and MS Access."
You saved yourself 7 characters by writing that nonsense "y, r, 1". Was that really worth it?
If you consider yourself a professional (which you seem to do), don't use such shorthand language.
And oh, for a production application NEVER use the JDBC-ODBC bridge driver from the JDK. It's for demonstration and testing only, too unstable and poorly performant for realworld use.
jwenting
duckman
8,392 posts since Nov 2004
Reputation Points: 1,662
Solved Threads: 337
I consider correct use of language to be extremely important for people creating software.
After all, software is a description of what a computer is to do written in a language.
If you can't even be bothered to use natural language correctly to communicate your thoughts, you probably don't bother to do the same to that computer.
And if you're incapable of communicating in natural language, you're also incapable of learning the skills needed to communicate with that computer effectively as those skills are passed along in that natural language.
Given that there is a highly disturbing trend of people incapable or unwilling to communicate in natural language using that language correctly and that trend coincides with a similar trend of those same people failing to write software that works, there does seem to be a strong link between the two phenomenon.
jwenting
duckman
8,392 posts since Nov 2004
Reputation Points: 1,662
Solved Threads: 337
I've read this and consider that jwenting has actually made effort to be polite in communicating what might be a tad off topic but nevertheless a very valid point. In any professional circle (and by professional I mean workplace, not simply trained and qualified people) the use of SMS or IM style abbreviated language is very much frowned upon.
It portrays a quite negative impression of you, and jwenting is only seeking to help you avoid that happening.
Catweazle
Grandad
4,335 posts since Mar 2004
Reputation Points: 229
Solved Threads: 149
I don't know what this whole thread is about, and I prefer to stay out of it, because I don't do well with insults and flame wars, but I just wanted to add that when programming, there are often an infinite number of ways to do a particular thing. Not only are there an infinite number of algorithms to do a task, but there are an infinite number of ways to execute (code) an algorithm. Not only that, but syntax / shorthand does exist for programming code. For example, in the C++ language,
x = x + 1;
can also be represented as
x += 1;
in addition to as
x++;
Just a shorthand way of writing it :)
cscgal
The Queen of DaniWeb
19,427 posts since Feb 2002
Reputation Points: 1,474
Solved Threads: 230
Yes, but it's shorthand that's part of the language specification.
It's like writing e.g. instead of "for example".
If I were to write "fe" when I mean "for example" noone'd understand me, right?
Same if I were to write x+; when I want to write x=x+1; the compiler will complain :)
jwenting
duckman
8,392 posts since Nov 2004
Reputation Points: 1,662
Solved Threads: 337
hkhan45, I popped into this topic an an effort to nicely try to defuse what seemed possible to turn into flaming. Yes I do think the initial request was an effort to point things out in a friendly manner. I now think that belligerence is being displayed.
It is extremely common on most tech sites that I've encountered for people to be asked to make the effort to type their posts in the best grammar/spelling they are able, and to avoid such things as '133t speak' and IM abbreviations. It is not considered 'impolite' to make such a request.
If I was confronted with a question looking like that inthe Tech section, for example, I'd quite probably respond with:
"Do you mind trying to type that out in English? Trying to read it makes my eyes bleed!"
Now could we leave this sidetrack go please? These comments have not been personally directed. They are simply an accurate depiction of how things work on tech message boards. You can choose to continue posting as you are of course, and it's quite probable that people will be reluctant to offer advice as a result. It's probably also inevitable that others will also ask that you use english rather than some 'home brew' of abbreviations.
Catweazle
Grandad
4,335 posts since Mar 2004
Reputation Points: 229
Solved Threads: 149
I've tried being nice. I've tried being quite clear almost to the point of bluntness. It's not going to make any difference, is it?
Please go to one of those hundreds of thousands of places 'U' seem to know of ;)
Topic closed.
Catweazle
Grandad
4,335 posts since Mar 2004
Reputation Points: 229
Solved Threads: 149