I have no idea why your Eclipse is so slow that is not normal. If you want you can try IntelliJ Idea 10 Community Edition that has now support for Android. As for what version of Java you should use, it doesn't matter.
PS: Next time please do not create new thread just because you did not receive fast reply.
peter_budo
Code tags enforcer
15,787 posts since Dec 2004
Reputation Points: 2,867
Solved Threads: 944
Skill Endorsements: 49
I see no reason why you got wind-up. I answered to my best knowledge and ask you not to double post. If you are not capable take friendly meant criticism well then that is bad.
Choice of staying or leaving is your. Nevertheless if you stay you are expected to adhere forum rules where keep it organize clear state "Do not post the same question multiple times"
peter_budo
Code tags enforcer
15,787 posts since Dec 2004
Reputation Points: 2,867
Solved Threads: 944
Skill Endorsements: 49
Hi,
I've started developing for Androind [ditched Symbian but that's a whole diferent styory], and I'm not what you'd call a naturall Java developer [much prefer c++]. Eclipse seems to run rediculously slowly on windows 7 (64bit), and running a dual boot system with Linux [on which it seems to run a lot faster] is out of the qustion as it destabalises my machine. I don't have the cash to invest in a dedicated Linux machine at the moment so that's out of the question, and I need windows for music production.
My question is does this have anything to do with the fact that I'm having to develop in 32bit Java on a 64bit system. Can I run Eclipse useing 64bit Java, and develop the app in 43bit Java for Android?
Thanx
[P.S. Sorry about the spelling, I'm dislexic and I've just switched back to IE and it dosen't have aspell checking]
As to the specific reason why Eclipse seems to run slow on your Win7 system, I can't say, but I do know that there is a LOT of unnecessary cruft running on most Win7 systems I have seen (clients - I won't touch it myself with a 10' poll). The first thing to look at is the virus scanner. Most Windows AV tools dynamically scan EVERY bit of stuff that goes into memory, with the resulting serious hit on performance. So, go to the security center and turn off on-access scanning and then see if it runs faster.
rubberman
Posting Maven
2,571 posts since Mar 2010
Reputation Points: 365
Solved Threads: 305
Skill Endorsements: 51
I am running Scientific Linux 6 (a clone of RHEL 6) for the past several months, after 3 years running CentOS 5 (close of RHEL 5). I've been happy with both, and both have some minor issues, stability not being one of those issues. Mostly they deal with changes in the desktop managers (KDE and Gnome). I run Windows in a virtual machine (using VirtualBox) which does support Windows 7, so if you want to run Win7 under Linux, you can easily enough. As for known problems with Win7 SP1, I don't know since as I mentioned before I don't run Win7. I have a couple of clients that run Win7, and they much prefer it to Vista, but that's not saying much.
rubberman
Posting Maven
2,571 posts since Mar 2010
Reputation Points: 365
Solved Threads: 305
Skill Endorsements: 51
@rubberman better read properly before you reply.
@1ML no idea why emulator is running so slow for you I have no problem on my pc (dual boot win 7 / ubuntu 10.10). However I do use IntelliJ instead of Eclipse. PS: You sure that partition was deleted? Windows normally moves boot-loader to it self, but it wouldn't wipe existing partition unless you told it to do. To recover boot-loader check this document
peter_budo
Code tags enforcer
15,787 posts since Dec 2004
Reputation Points: 2,867
Solved Threads: 944
Skill Endorsements: 49
@rubberman better read properly before you reply.
@1ML no idea why emulator is running so slow for you I have no problem on my pc (dual boot win 7 / ubuntu 10.10). However I do use IntelliJ instead of Eclipse. PS: You sure that partition was deleted? Windows normally moves boot-loader to it self, but it wouldn't wipe existing partition unless you told it to do. To recover boot-loader check this document
I was replying to the post immediately before my last one, so in that sense I think it was on topic, if not specific to the original posting of this thread.
rubberman
Posting Maven
2,571 posts since Mar 2010
Reputation Points: 365
Solved Threads: 305
Skill Endorsements: 51
Than's for the advice, I'm off to bed bet right now, just got up to post a news flash about Libya that I got from my phone, then saw your response. I'll definitely check this out in the morning though. Thank you very much:)
Sorry, accidentally down-checked this post - unfortunately, once you do that I don't know of a way to undo it... my bad!
rubberman
Posting Maven
2,571 posts since Mar 2010
Reputation Points: 365
Solved Threads: 305
Skill Endorsements: 51
Sorry, accidentally down-checked this post - unfortunately, once you do that I don't know of a way to undo it... my bad!
Yeah, unfortunately there is no way to cancel it even on an accidental click. I voted it back up to offset :)
Ezzaral
null
16,110 posts since May 2007
Reputation Points: 3,292
Solved Threads: 873
Skill Endorsements: 27
I was replying to the post immediately before my last one, so in that sense I think it was on topic, if not specific to the original posting of this thread.
Still of topic as question was asked why it is running slower on Windows. Down voting my re-primal that you are going off topic is just lame...
peter_budo
Code tags enforcer
15,787 posts since Dec 2004
Reputation Points: 2,867
Solved Threads: 944
Skill Endorsements: 49
Still of topic as question was asked why it is running slower on Windows. Down voting my re-primal that you are going off topic is just lame...
Lame, I agree, and apologize for my pique. Won't happen again, but you could cut folks a bit of slack in these regards. Just my 2cents worth.
rubberman
Posting Maven
2,571 posts since Mar 2010
Reputation Points: 365
Solved Threads: 305
Skill Endorsements: 51
Question Answered as of 2 Years Ago by
rubberman,
peter_budo
and
Ezzaral