Search DaniWeb - uniform_initialization

Re: C++11 Uniform Initialization 11 Years Ago by Tumlee Uniform initialization refers to this, correct? class xypoint { public: float x; float y; xypoint(float xx, float yy) : x{xx}, y{yy} { } }; xypoint returnpoint(void) { //Equivalent to "return xypoint(3, 4);" return {3, 4};… Re: C++11 Uniform Initialization 11 Years Ago by vijayan121 Well, brace-enclosed initialization solves the 'most vexing parse' problem quite nicely. struct A { A() ; /* ... */ } ; struct B { B(A) ; /* ... */ } ; B b1 ( A() ) ; // declares a function b1 B b2 { A{} } ; // defines an object b2 B b3 ( ( A() ) ) ; // defines an object b3 . . Uniform initialization… C++11 Uniform Initialization 11 Years Ago by deceptikon … [uniform initialization](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B11#Uniform_initialization)? Listening to folks like Herb Sutter, it seems like the… Re: C++11 Uniform Initialization 11 Years Ago by CGSMCMLXXV I read that article from Wikipedia in its full length a month ago or so. From what I noticed, the general idea of those changes is to make C++ more competitive and I agree with most of those changes. About uniform initialization, that may come from the languages where the variables don't have type definitions and use tuples as one of the basic … Re: C++11 Uniform Initialization 11 Years Ago by mike_2000_17 I remember, early on when learning C++, to be a bit frustrated at limitations of C-style struct initialization and how awkwardly it mixed with C++ classes. But I also remembered letting go of that quite quickly and never really missing it. Now that the rules have been updated to more or less solve those tiny frustrations, I'm glad about it, but … Re: C++11 Uniform Initialization 11 Years Ago by deceptikon > Saying the feature is "contraversial", I think that goes too far. Note that I called it *potentially* controversial. I can't say it's controversial when there's no controversy to speak of yet. But given syntax shifts in the past, I can safely say that more than a few people will be vocal about it if it starts to get used regularly … Re: C++11 Uniform Initialization 11 Years Ago by NathanOliver After reading that wiki link you provided I am not a big fan. In order for it to work the person using it will need to know the internals of the class to know what to pass. To me this harms encapsulation. I dont think I'll be using it unless like you said deceptikon, >iff it's widely adopted amongst C++ programmers and not just the elite. Re: Uniform cost search algorithm implemaentation in C++ 10 Years Ago by Moschops This code shows a function `uniformSearch` that will search an array and will take a uniform amount of time, except if the array is really, really big. If that happens, you can increase the amount of time the search should take until it takes a uniform amount of time again. The uniform amount of time it will takes (in seconds) is passed into the … Uniform random number between(0.1] 15 Years Ago by ozan Hi, I try to generate uniform random number between 0 and 1. I wrote this code but it creates only numbers at the 0.1***. Generated number always have 0.1 and remaning numbers change, like 0.1234, 0.13444,0.143334.... Can you show me show how can I generate these numbers (uniformly) at (0,1]. [code] #include <cmath> #include <… Uniform cost search algorithm implemaentation in C++ 10 Years Ago by SurafielHabib C++ code for uniform cost search algorithm Uniform background 10 Years Ago by davy_yg Hello, I wonder about one thing: I am trying to create a uniform background for this all navigation links in this site: [Infracom](http://www.infracom.co.id/infracom/) I do not really create the site - since we no longer hire the one who create it and I have to maintain it. index.php <?php require('wds.php'); include(INC_DIR .… Re: initialization list question 13 Years Ago by mike_2000_17 [QUOTE=L7Sqr;1485857]What happens is that the default constructor for the object is invoked (which in this case happens to be 0). Try doing it with an object that doesnt have a default constructor and you will see what I mean.[/QUOTE] @L7Sqr: I'm sorry, but I have to correct your statement. I think it is an important point to clarify. Primitive… Re: Initialization Lists 16 Years Ago by thekashyap [quote=vijayan121;387507]members or base class sub-objects cannot be initialized inside the body of the constructor; they can only be assigned to. initialization is always before the body of the constructor executes.[/quote]Think that answers the question adequately. Just to be clearer.. the difference between initialization and assignment is: 1. … Re: Initialization Lists 16 Years Ago by vijayan121 members or base class sub-objects cannot be initialized inside the body of the constructor; they can only be assigned to. initialization is always before the body of the constructor executes. if not initialized expliciltly using colon initialization, the implementation will provide default initialization if available. for any member which does not … Re: initialization list question 13 Years Ago by vijayan121 [QUOTE=;]You are basically asking the person who reads your code to be aware of "value-initialization of POD type means zero-initialization". This is not so common (many people wouldn't even know the difference between default-initialization and value-initialization).[/QUOTE] I would expect that anyone who has used a standard library … Re: Initialization Lists 16 Years Ago by bsrivastava [QUOTE=bala24;387484]Hi, I was just browsing through some stuff about Initialization lists in C++ and got stuck with a doubt.. Why is it necessary to use initialization lists while giving a value to constants or references ?? Why is it not possible to do so in the normal way..i.e initializing them within the constructor. Any help would… Re: initialization list question 13 Years Ago by mike_2000_17 yes, but I would still recommend making the initial value explicit (as in [ICODE]stinker() : pointer(NULL), age(0) { };[/ICODE]. You are basically asking the person who reads your code to be aware of "value-initialization of POD type means zero-initialization". This is not so common (many people wouldn't even know the difference between … Initialization Lists 16 Years Ago by bala24 Hi, I was just browsing through some stuff about Initialization lists in C++ and got stuck with a doubt.. Why is it necessary to use initialization lists while giving a value to constants or references ?? Why is it not possible to do so in the normal way..i.e initializing them within the constructor. Any help would be appreciated.. Thanks … Re: Initialization Lists 16 Years Ago by ~s.o.s~ [quote=thekashyap;388045] Going by the normal C/C++ tip: [B]do[/B] [inlinecode]int i = 0;[/inlinecode] [B]instead of:[/B] [inlinecode]int i; i = 0;[/inlinecode] So when you know the value for a variable at the time of it's creation it's better to initialize it to save a li'l time, rather than letting SOME value being set in initialization and then… Initialization problem 15 Years Ago by &rea Hello, I have got a problem with an initialization. [code] #define TAB 1000 int table_collision [][TAB]; void function() { for(int i=0;i<2;i++) { for(int j=0;j<TAB;j++) { table_collision[i][j] = 0; } } } [/code] When I look each value I see that the initialization doesn't work. For example … Initialization skipped by case label 15 Years Ago by robgeek Hi everyone, I have worked some more on my code and this time I am getting some error that I am not able to resolve. Please help me. The error says: "initialization skipped by case label." Please show me how to resolve this. Here is the code. The error has a remark in red. [code] // Hw6_Bhasin.cpp : Defines the entry point for … initialization of 'levelOne' is skipped by 'case' label 10 Years Ago by babiiros i"m new at this.. please help me! i keep getting this error Error 5 error C2360: initialization of 'levelOne' is skipped by 'case' label. I get a "transfer of control bypasses initialization of:" error when i try to build the following switch: void ViewCourses() { int choice = 0; cout<<"Please … Re: Initialization Lists 16 Years Ago by ~s.o.s~ > For a non-basic type the c'tor is always called (after memory allocation). Though you have to realize that classes in the end are composed of primitive types and if an explicit constructor is not written to take care of the initialization, the same situation would result (junk values of primitive types). > Will both i and *j print junk … Re: Initialization skipped by case label 15 Years Ago by mitrmkar [QUOTE=robgeek;746214] The error says: "initialization skipped by case label."[/QUOTE] You can circumvent that [COLOR="Red"]by[/COLOR] ... [code] int main() { ... switch(option) { case 'h': case 'H': [COLOR="Red"]{[/COLOR] // new scope begins here ... ... ifstream input(&… Initialization of Array inside a Structure 15 Years Ago by indiansoil Hi, I have decalared a structure named record as given below and also created a function called read() inside the structure. The function works fine when I call it using this statement: myRecord.read(); but I want to create one more function which can be called to initilize all the variables and arrays. When I tried to initialize an … Initialization parameters changing 14 Years Ago by babusek HI Folks, we have database servers of large application. we set initialization parameters log_archive_dest_1="/u02/fra" and log_archive_dest_2 ="/u04/data". But after some time being the parameter "log_archive_dest_2 " changed to "/u01/get" can u please tell me what are the operations on database … initialization list question 13 Years Ago by lochnessmonster class stinker { private: int *pointer; int age; public: stinker() : pointer(), age() { ;} }; if i don't pass a value to my variables in an initialization list, do they automatically get initialized to 0? Re: initialization list question 13 Years Ago by L7Sqr [QUOTE=lochnessmonster;1485649] if i don't pass a value to my variables in an initialization list, do they automatically get initialized to 0?[/QUOTE] What happens is that the default constructor for the object is invoked (which in this case happens to be 0). Try doing it with an object that doesnt have a default constructor and you will see what … initialization 10 Years Ago by 21345572 what is member initialization? Re: initialization 10 Years Ago by 21310051 member initialization is assigning a default value to a member