•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the Motherboards, CPUs and RAM section within the Tech Talk category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 391,565 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 2,594 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our Motherboards, CPUs and RAM advertiser:
Views: 510 | Replies: 12 | Solved
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 142
Reputation:
Rep Power: 1
Solved Threads: 6
Intel chips are the best performing chips, especially for gaming, but you have to remember that you'd need to be buying one of the top 5 Intel chips to be at a level you couldn't match with AMD.
According to YouGamers (linked from 3dmakrs homepage) the top ten best value chips, measured by estimated 3dmarks per dollar, are all AMD chips with most of the list following suite.
http://www.yougamers.com/hardware/st...ndperformance/
Intel has better top-end chips, but in the mid range there's not much difference between a $125 Athlon X2 and a $150 core2 duo. If you want to build a really serious gaming rig without much concern for price you'd probably want Intel, but if you're looking at a mid-range system with a $75-200 cpu, you can get the same performance out of either brand if you pick the right chip.
We've been arguing the AMD vs. Intel debate for nearly two decades. No one post on any forum is going to provide a definitive answer. Every couple of years one comes out on top of the other in performance, let's look back a little shal we?
AMD developed widespread 64-bit technology first, but Intel beat them to dual core.
AMD's first dual cores performed better than Intels, and Intels quads perform better than AMDs now.
AMD's opterons performed better than Intels Xeons for a long time.
Intels Core2 series butchered AMDs Turions in laptops, and then even grew to out-perform the Athlon in the desktop market.
It looks like AMD is going to beat intel to the market with integrated CPU/GPU pairs.
They're always going to go back and forth for dominance in perforamance, but when it comes down to it, I don't think AMD will ever surpass Intel in market share, unless Intel goes completely out of business. Anybody who's really qualified to recommend hardware should be able to consider cost, performance, compatibility, upgradeability, warranty, brand, and all the other factors in picking a CPU for an individuals needs.
According to YouGamers (linked from 3dmakrs homepage) the top ten best value chips, measured by estimated 3dmarks per dollar, are all AMD chips with most of the list following suite.
http://www.yougamers.com/hardware/st...ndperformance/
Intel has better top-end chips, but in the mid range there's not much difference between a $125 Athlon X2 and a $150 core2 duo. If you want to build a really serious gaming rig without much concern for price you'd probably want Intel, but if you're looking at a mid-range system with a $75-200 cpu, you can get the same performance out of either brand if you pick the right chip.
We've been arguing the AMD vs. Intel debate for nearly two decades. No one post on any forum is going to provide a definitive answer. Every couple of years one comes out on top of the other in performance, let's look back a little shal we?
AMD developed widespread 64-bit technology first, but Intel beat them to dual core.
AMD's first dual cores performed better than Intels, and Intels quads perform better than AMDs now.
AMD's opterons performed better than Intels Xeons for a long time.
Intels Core2 series butchered AMDs Turions in laptops, and then even grew to out-perform the Athlon in the desktop market.
It looks like AMD is going to beat intel to the market with integrated CPU/GPU pairs.
They're always going to go back and forth for dominance in perforamance, but when it comes down to it, I don't think AMD will ever surpass Intel in market share, unless Intel goes completely out of business. Anybody who's really qualified to recommend hardware should be able to consider cost, performance, compatibility, upgradeability, warranty, brand, and all the other factors in picking a CPU for an individuals needs.
-This post is provided without warranty, emotion, or a conscience. Hope it helps-
![]() |
•
•
•
•
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Motherboards, CPUs and RAM Marketplace
•
•
•
•
age amd avatar blue gene chips core database development dos economy energy enterprise graphics hardware hp ibm ibm. news intel intel ibm it linux medicine memory microsoft news nvidia open source open-source opengl openoffice pc pram processors ps3 quad recession red hat russia semiconductors sun supercomputer supercomputing tech stocks technology technology stocks trends ubuntu via working x86
- AMD Vs Pentium (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- Switching Camps -Intel and AMD (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- Intel vs AMD (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- Intel Vs. AMD (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- Intel or Amd for naturally speaking and other extensive programs. (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- AMD Model Best (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
Other Threads in the Motherboards, CPUs and RAM Forum
- Previous Thread: Help! my HP desktop computer refuse to boot from the bios.
- Next Thread: What is my motherboard model,I just have the installation CD


Linear Mode