•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the Getting Started and Choosing a Distro section within the Tech Talk category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 456,434 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 2,616 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our Getting Started and Choosing a Distro advertiser: Lunarpages Linux Web Hosting
Views: 7457 | Replies: 31
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 12,883
Reputation:
Rep Power: 32
Solved Threads: 304
•
•
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 1,036
Reputation:
Rep Power: 4
Solved Threads: 23
if you were a company that made software for consumers, wouldn't you write it for the most used operating system? Windows has been dominant for a very long time. There are plenty of applications that will literally let you do anything. There's everything from little apps to full blown software suites. Just because most software for linux is open source, it does not mean that there's more of it.
Florida Rocks!
•
•
•
•
if you were a company that made software for consumers, wouldn't you write it for the most used operating system? Windows has been dominant for a very long time. There are plenty of applications that will literally let you do anything. There's everything from little apps to full blown software suites. Just because most software for linux is open source, it does not mean that there's more of it.
I think you're confusing commercial and open source software development. Your argument for reaching the most consumers is only valid for commercial development, as the goal is usually money. Open source developers use whatever operating system suits them best, which usually tends to be Linux. Also, open source development usually progresses at a much faster rate than commercial development, so I'm willing to bet that Linux has a larger application library. That doesn't necessarily mean that Linux software is better, just that there's more of it.
>there is definately more linux software than mac software
That's a vague statement at best. The latest version of Mac OS X is officially Unix-certified, and can run Linux software just like any other *nix system can (assuming it's open source, which it usually is).
•
•
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 1,036
Reputation:
Rep Power: 4
Solved Threads: 23
>Since you don't seem to be understanding the point I'm trying to get at, let me try another way. Mac OS X is officially certified as Unix. Since it's Unix, it can run Unix software. Now do you get it? It doesn't have to be written on a Macintosh to be able to be considered "Mac software".
This really isn't a valid point. Even though Mac is UNIX, most Linux and BSD software does require a seperate Mac port.
This really isn't a valid point. Even though Mac is UNIX, most Linux and BSD software does require a seperate Mac port.
Last edited by Sturm : Nov 5th, 2007 at 10:16 pm.
"Hey ass, don't hijack my thread. This is serious." -JoshSCH
![]() |
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Getting Started and Choosing a Distro Marketplace
•
•
•
•
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
- Gentoo vs Ubuntu (Getting Started and Choosing a Distro)
- Multiple themes on a forum? (Growing an Online Community)
- My Ubuntu Desktop, themes and what not (Window and Desktop Managers)
- XP Styles or Winblinds - Performance hit? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- TechTalk Styles back in business (DaniWeb Community Feedback)
- TechTalk Styles (DaniWeb Community Feedback)
Other Threads in the Getting Started and Choosing a Distro Forum
- Previous Thread: Linux on a Notebook
- Next Thread: which linux for me



Linear Mode