<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>DaniWeb IT Discussion Community - Domains and DNS</title>
		<link>http://www.daniweb.com/forums/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Our Domains and DNS forum is the place for Q&A-style discussions related to domain name registration and DNS-related questions. Note that there is a separate Domain Names for Sale forum within the Webmaster Marketplace sub-category of our IT Water Cooler category.]]></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:56:08 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[News Story Beware of Comcast's Growing Power]]></title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/news/story247878.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I write a lot of about the battle among large technology corporations in this space and the importance of competitive checks and balances. Yet Comcast seems to be growing into a super power with control over the very pipes that provide many of us with internet access, but without any real...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I write a lot of about the battle among large technology corporations in this space and the importance of competitive checks and balances. Yet Comcast seems to be growing into a super power with control over the very pipes that provide many of us with internet access, but without any real competition and often with government support.<br />
<br />
Most places in this country get internet access through one or at most two providers. That kind of concentration of power is increasingly a threat to the very foundation of business and society, as so many of us use the internet on one level or another to do our jobs, get our information and connect to one another.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight:bold">Low Competition and Not forced to Share Pipes</span><br />
<br />
Unlike the phone companies, which years ago were forced to share their copper wires with competitors who offer cheaper service, the <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://news.cnet.com/Cable-wins-Supreme-Court-battle/2100-1036_3-5764120.html" target="_blank">US Supreme Court ruled years ago</a> that cable companies did not share the same obligation; which is a puzzling decision when you think about it. If phone companies have to share their wires, why don't the cable providers? In fact, when that decision was made back in 2005, most cable companies didn't offer phone service. They now do, yet they are still not required by regulators to behave in the same fashion as the phone companies. The only difference here mind you is the type of wire.<br />
<br />
Perhaps the only real difference is Comcast's power base and the millions it's spending in Washington to ensure that it isn't forced to play by the same rules. We know from experience that as technology advances, it's not unusual for government regulation to be slow to catch up, but we are far enough along the path at this point, and the lines between these types of services have become sufficiently blurred, that it makes little sense not to even the playing field and force competition.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight:bold">Comcast's Big and It's Getting Bigger</span><br />
<br />
Just recently <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2009/12/04/MNNS1AUHPL.DTL" target="_blank">Comcast bought NBC Universal</a>, which means as we move forward (assuming the deal is approved, and there's little reason to believe it won't), that Comcast will not only own the cable, but they'll be producing their own content as well. Some have suggested that this deal is similar to the Time Warner/AOL deal that proved to be a huge failure, but AOL was a company in decline at the purchase time. Comcast and NBCU are healthy companies.<br />
<br />
While it's always possible that cultural clashes and poor implementation could eventually torpedo the deal, for now, it leaves Comcast in an extremely powerful position controlling both content creation and the distribution system that both it and its content production competitors must use. Not exactly a recipe for competitive pressure and all of the positive results that competition brings.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight:bold">Let's Build Our Own</span><br />
<br />
One way out of this, is to create municipal internet access, an idea that was bandied about quite frequently before our economic meltdown. A <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;ct2=us%2F0_0_s_1_0_t&amp;usg=AFQjCNEuZUKR-sdU4-hQTFiLkv4iA6IdPw&amp;cid=0&amp;ei=SIIuS6iBF-GpmQevk4L1AQ&amp;rt=SEARCH&amp;vm=STANDARD&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.valleyadvocate.com%2Farticle.cfm%3Faid%3D11010" target="_blank">story in this week's Valley Advocate</a>, an alternative weekly newspaper that publishes in western Massachusetts, applauds an effort by my hometown of Amherst, MA to create its own small wireless network within the confines of its cozy downtown. The network, a product of a partnership between UMass Amherst and the town, with the help of some hefty grants, provides a snapshot of how we could create these types of systems independent of the larger providers like Comcast.<br />
<br />
In tough economic times, it's hard to put the burden for such systems onto cities and towns already struggling to cover existing costs, but the economy will rebound eventually, and when it does, having wireless networks on the long-term plan will help push these ideas forward and perhaps begin to chip away at the alarmingly growing power of companies like Comcast to control our access to the internet.</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>Techwriter10</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread247878.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ISP DNS Server setup</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread247649.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:33:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[We have own DNS server - windows 2003 server OS. We are having primary DNS server as well as secondary DNS server & reverse pointer zone. Now I am facing some problem of setting up ptr record for mail server. Reverse ptr entries are not shown me for this IP address. Help me or guide me for go...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>We have own DNS server - windows 2003 server OS. We are having primary DNS server as well as secondary DNS server &amp; reverse pointer zone. Now I am facing some problem of setting up ptr record for mail server. Reverse ptr entries are not shown me for this IP address. Help me or guide me for go furhter...</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>dipeshkhadye</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread247649.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>News Story U.S. Government Begins Awarding Broadband Stimulus Grants</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/news/story247325.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:18:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The federal government today made (http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/vice-president-biden-kicks-72-billion-recovery-act-broadband-program) the first awards aimed toward improving broadband access in the U.S. 
 
In the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The federal government today <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/vice-president-biden-kicks-72-billion-recovery-act-broadband-program" target="_blank">made</a> the first awards aimed toward improving broadband access in the U.S.<br />
<br />
In the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the stimulus package, Congress appropriated $7.2 billion for broadband grants, loans, and loan guarantees to be administered by the USDA’s Rural Utilities Service (RUS) and the Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). The deadline for applications for the first round was earlier this year.<br />
<br />
At an event at Impulse Manufacturing in Dawsonville, Georgia, with Governor Sonny Perdue (R-GA), Vice President Joe Biden announced an initial $183 million investment in eighteen broadband projects benefiting seventeen states, which has already been matched by more than $46 million in public and private sector capital, the White House said.<br />
<br />
The following Middle Mile awards were made through the Department of Commerce:<br />
<ul><li>GEORGIA: North Georgia Network Cooperative, Inc., $33.5 million grant with an additional $8.8 million in matching funds to deploy a 260-mile regional fiber-optic ring to deliver gigabit broadband in the North Georgia foothills.</li>
<li>MAINE: Biddeford Internet Corp. (d.b.a. GWI), $25.4 million grant with an additional $6.4 million in matching funds to build a 1,100-mile open access fiber-optic network extending to the most rural and disadvantaged areas of the state of Maine, from the Saint John Valley in the north, to the rocky coastline of downeast Maine, to the mountainous regions of western Maine.</li>
<li>NEW YORK: ION Hold Co., LLC, $39.7 million grant with an additional $9.9 million in matching funds to build 10 new segments of fiber-optic, middle mile broadband infrastructure, serving more than 70 rural communities in upstate New York and parts of Pennsylvania and Vermont.</li>
<li>SOUTH DAKOTA: South Dakota Network, LLC, $20.6 million grant with an additional $5.1 million in matching funds to add 140 miles of backbone network and 219 miles of middle mile spurs to existing network, enabling the delivery of at least 10 Mbps service to more than 220 existing anchor institution customers in rural and underserved areas of the state.</li>
</ul><br />
The following Public Computer Center awards were made through the Department of Commerce:<br />
<ul><li>ARIZONA: Arizona State Library, Archives and Public Records, $1.3 million grant with matching funds of $320,000 to enhance existing facilities in more than 80 public libraries throughout the state. The project expects to deploy more than 1,000 computers.</li>
<li>MASSACHUSETTS: City of Boston, $1.9 million grant with matching funds of $477,000 to expand computer and Internet capacity at the city’s main library and 25 branches, 16 community centers, and 11 public housing sites.</li>
<li>MINNESOTA: Regents of the University of Minnesota, $2.9 million grant with matching funds of $741,000 to enhance broadband awareness and use for residents in four federally-designated poverty zones in Minneapolis and St. Paul.</li>
<li>WASHINGTON: The Inland Northwest Community Access Network (Tincan), $1.3 million grant with matching funds of $753,000 to establish three new public computer centers and expand 14 existing centers throughout Spokane’s poorest neighborhoods to serve more than 5,000 additional users per week.</li>
</ul><br />
The following Sustainable Broadband Adoption awards were made through the Department of Commerce:<br />
<ul><li>NEW MEXICO: New Mexico State Library, $1.5 million grant with an additional $591,000 in matching funds to increase broadband adoption and promote computer literacy and Internet use.</li>
<li>WASHINGTON: The Inland Northwest Community Access Network, $981,000 grant with an additional $728,000 in matching funds to increase broadband adoption through basic and advanced computer skill training, as well as community-based outreach campaigns to highlight the benefits of broadband for vulnerable populations in Spokane.</li>
</ul><br />
The following Last Mile and Middle Mile awards were made today through the U.S. Department of Agriculture:<br />
<ul><li>ALASKA: Anchorage, Rivada Sea Lion, LLC, $25.3 million grant with $6.4 million of leveraged funds; 4G high-speed broadband internet service availability to more than 9,000 unserved locations in a 90,000 square mile area where these Southwestern Alaska inhabitants are living at subsistence level.</li>
<li>HAWAII: Big Island Broadband/Aloha Broadband, Inc., $106,503 loan with matching funds of $87,405 to bring broadband services to an unserved area in the northern part of the islands where there are nearly 600 residents and businesses.</li>
<li>COLORADO/NEBRASKA: Peetz, Colorado, Peetz Cooperative Telephone Co., $1.5 million grant; expansion of existing infrastructure utilizing a combination of technologies. This project will make broadband service available to as many as 550 locations in the service area.</li>
<li>MICHIGAN: The Chatham Telephone Company, $8.6 million grant to bring high speed DSL broadband service to remote, unserved businesses and households within its rural territory; service that is comparable to the DSL service provided in its more populated areas.</li>
<li>NEW HAMPSHIRE: Bretton Woods, The Bretton Woods Telephone Company, $985,000 grant for 20 Mbps two-way broadband service to all potential customers and stimulate tourism in the area to substantially improve the local economy. This Fiber to The Premise service will be available to more than 400 locations.</li>
<li>NEW YORK: Potsdam, Slic Network Solutions (Nicholville Telephone) a grant of $4.3 million and loan of $1.1 million for a 136-mile fiber optic network reaching into five towns in rural Franklin County. This all-fiber network will deliver broadband voice, and IPTV services to remote rural areas. The network will offer service to more than 6,500 locations.</li>
<li>OHIO: North Central Ohio Rural Fiber Optic Network, Consolidated Electric Cooperative, $1,034,413 grant and $1,399,499 loan; and matching funds of  $1,225,000. The funding is integral to a smart grid initiative and broadband service based on an open-connectivity fiber optic backbone network.</li>
<li>OKLAHOMA: Southeast Oklahoma, The Pine Telephone Company, $9.5 grant with an additional $4.6 million in private funds to provide services to an entirely remote, rural, unserved and severely economically disadvantaged community.</li>
</ul><br />
An additional $1.8 billion will be made available on a rolling basis over the next 75 days.<br />
<br />
The White House also issued a <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/20091217-recovery-act-investments-broadband.pdf" target="_blank">report</a>, <span style="font-style:italic">Recovery Act Investments in Broadband:<br />
Leveraging Federal Dollars to Create Jobs and Connect America</span>, with more details about the goals of the overall programs, as well as how the projects announced today were intended to support those goals.</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>slfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread247325.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Adding a DNS to hit a webmail.company.com from inside domain</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread246919.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:33:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>hello all, i am looking to add the abilty to hit our webmail.company.com from inside our domain. Outside the domain the webmail.company.com works, just not inside the domain 
 
I dont have any idea on how to do this... i am looking for a step by step way to complete this 
 
thank you in advance</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>hello all, i am looking to add the abilty to hit our webmail.company.com from inside our domain. Outside the domain the webmail.company.com works, just not inside the domain<br />
<br />
I dont have any idea on how to do this... i am looking for a step by step way to complete this<br />
<br />
thank you in advance</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>cronald12706</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread246919.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dns record changes</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread246847.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:02:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Dear all, 
 
Is there anyway to know who changed the dns record and when. 
 
Please its urgent. 
 
Regards  
Azam</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Dear all,<br />
<br />
Is there anyway to know who changed the dns record and when.<br />
<br />
Please its urgent.<br />
<br />
Regards <br />
Azam</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>md_azam</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread246847.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Erm... Lots of routers down for me.</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread246213.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:49:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="codeblock"> <div class="spaced"> <div style="float:right; margin-right:10px"> <a href="/forums/misc.php?do=explaincode&amp;TB_iframe=true&amp;height=400&amp;width=680" class="thickbox" title="Help with Code Tags" target="_blank">Help with Code Tags</a> </div> <div>(<a href="#"...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <pre style="margin:20px; line-height:13px">Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6002]<br />
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation.&nbsp; All rights reserved.<br />
<br />
C:\Users\Maulth&gt;tracert 205.234.153.26<br />
<br />
Tracing route to 26.153.234.205.hypernia.com [205.234.153.26]<br />
over a maximum of 30 hops:<br />
<br />
&nbsp; 1&nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;1 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;1 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;1 ms&nbsp; 192.168.2.1<br />
&nbsp; 2&nbsp; &nbsp;  7 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 12 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  8 ms&nbsp; 10.229.254.254<br />
&nbsp; 3&nbsp; &nbsp;  7 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 12 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  7 ms&nbsp; 222.5.124.24.cm.sunflower.com [24.124.5.222]<br />
&nbsp; 4&nbsp; &nbsp;  8 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  7 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  8 ms&nbsp; 242.3.124.24.cm.sunflower.com [24.124.3.242]<br />
&nbsp; 5&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 13 ms&nbsp; wsip-70-166-230-173.ks.ks.cox.net [70.166.230.17<br />
3]<br />
&nbsp; 6&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; 70.183.66.245<br />
&nbsp; 7&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 13 ms&nbsp; 70.183.71.61<br />
&nbsp; 8&nbsp; &nbsp;  *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp;  Request timed out.<br />
&nbsp; 9&nbsp; &nbsp;  *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp;  Request timed out.<br />
&nbsp;10&nbsp; &nbsp;  *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp;  Request timed out.<br />
&nbsp;11&nbsp; &nbsp; 47 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 19 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 20 ms&nbsp; dalsbbrj02-ae2.0.r2.dl.cox.net [68.1.1.243]<br />
&nbsp;12&nbsp; &nbsp; 19 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 19 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 19 ms&nbsp; 68.105.30.34<br />
&nbsp;13&nbsp; &nbsp; 21 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 20 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 19 ms&nbsp; ae0-40g.cr1.dfw1.us.nlayer.net [69.31.63.125]<br />
&nbsp;14&nbsp; &nbsp; 29 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 29 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 29 ms&nbsp; xe-2-2-0.cr2.ord1.us.nlayer.net [69.22.142.2]<br />
&nbsp;15&nbsp; &nbsp; 30 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 29 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 29 ms&nbsp; po6.ar2.ord1.us.scnet.net [69.31.111.6]<br />
&nbsp;16&nbsp; &nbsp; 30 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 31 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 31 ms&nbsp; 62.po2.ar2.ord6.us.scnet.net [75.102.3.230]<br />
&nbsp;17&nbsp; &nbsp; 35 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 31 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 39 ms&nbsp; as36352.ge9-44.ar2.ord6.us.scnet.net [75.102.4.3<br />
4]<br />
&nbsp;18&nbsp; &nbsp; 31 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 32 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 31 ms&nbsp; ge-0-1.FZ146.core.chicago.colocrossing.com [75.1<br />
02.34.250]<br />
&nbsp;19&nbsp; &nbsp; 32 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 31 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 32 ms&nbsp; 26.153.234.205.hypernia.com [205.234.153.26]<br />
<br />
Trace complete.<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
C:\Users\Maulth&gt;tracert 69.147.227.162<br />
<br />
Tracing route to mygamecp.hypernia.com [69.147.227.162]<br />
over a maximum of 30 hops:<br />
<br />
&nbsp; 1&nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;1 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;1 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;1 ms&nbsp; 192.168.2.1<br />
&nbsp; 2&nbsp; &nbsp;  8 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  7 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  7 ms&nbsp; 10.229.254.254<br />
&nbsp; 3&nbsp; &nbsp;  8 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  7 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 24 ms&nbsp; 222.5.124.24.cm.sunflower.com [24.124.5.222]<br />
&nbsp; 4&nbsp; &nbsp;  7 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  7 ms&nbsp; 242.3.124.24.cm.sunflower.com [24.124.3.242]<br />
&nbsp; 5&nbsp; &nbsp;  8 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; wsip-70-166-230-173.ks.ks.cox.net [70.166.230.17<br />
3]<br />
&nbsp; 6&nbsp; &nbsp; 23 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 10 ms&nbsp; 70.183.66.245<br />
&nbsp; 7&nbsp; &nbsp;  8 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 10 ms&nbsp; 70.183.71.61<br />
&nbsp; 8&nbsp; &nbsp;  *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp;  Request timed out.<br />
&nbsp; 9&nbsp; &nbsp;  *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp;  Request timed out.<br />
&nbsp;10&nbsp; &nbsp;  *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp;  Request timed out.<br />
&nbsp;11&nbsp; &nbsp; 19 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 19 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 20 ms&nbsp; dalsbbrj02-ae2.0.r2.dl.cox.net [68.1.1.243]<br />
&nbsp;12&nbsp; &nbsp; 20 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 19 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 20 ms&nbsp; 68.105.30.34<br />
&nbsp;13&nbsp; &nbsp; 21 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 20 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 21 ms&nbsp; ae0-40g.cr1.dfw1.us.nlayer.net [69.31.63.153]<br />
&nbsp;14&nbsp; &nbsp; 41 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 30 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 31 ms&nbsp; xe-2-2-0.cr2.ord1.us.nlayer.net [69.22.142.2]<br />
&nbsp;15&nbsp; &nbsp; 30 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 38 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 30 ms&nbsp; po2-30g.ar1.ord1.us.nlayer.net [69.31.111.138]<br />
&nbsp;16&nbsp; &nbsp; 31 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 37 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 31 ms&nbsp; er01.chi01.ubiquityservers.com [69.31.111.66]<br />
&nbsp;17&nbsp; &nbsp; 32 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 33 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 31 ms&nbsp; mygamecp.hypernia.com [69.147.227.162]<br />
<br />
Trace complete.<br />
<br />
<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6002]<br />
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation.&nbsp; All rights reserved.<br />
<br />
C:\Users\Maulth&gt;tracert yahoo.com<br />
<br />
Tracing route to yahoo.com [209.131.36.159]<br />
over a maximum of 30 hops:<br />
<br />
&nbsp; 1&nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;1 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  1 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;1 ms&nbsp; 192.168.2.1<br />
&nbsp; 2&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 19 ms&nbsp; 10.229.254.254<br />
&nbsp; 3&nbsp; &nbsp;  7 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  7 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  7 ms&nbsp; 222.5.124.24.cm.sunflower.com [24.124.5.222]<br />
&nbsp; 4&nbsp;  167 ms&nbsp;  366 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 61 ms&nbsp; 242.3.124.24.cm.sunflower.com [24.124.3.242]<br />
&nbsp; 5&nbsp; &nbsp;  8 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 10 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  8 ms&nbsp; wsip-70-166-230-173.ks.ks.cox.net [70.166.230.17<br />
3]<br />
&nbsp; 6&nbsp; &nbsp;  7 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; 70.183.66.245<br />
&nbsp; 7&nbsp; &nbsp;  8 ms&nbsp; &nbsp;  9 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 13 ms&nbsp; 70.183.71.61<br />
&nbsp; 8&nbsp; &nbsp;  *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp;  Request timed out.<br />
&nbsp; 9&nbsp; &nbsp;  *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp;  Request timed out.<br />
&nbsp;10&nbsp; &nbsp;  *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; *&nbsp; &nbsp;  Request timed out.<br />
&nbsp;11&nbsp; &nbsp; 20 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 19 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 19 ms&nbsp; dalsbbrj02-ae2.0.r2.dl.cox.net [68.1.1.243]<br />
&nbsp;12&nbsp; &nbsp; 20 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 22 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 24 ms&nbsp; dalsbbrj01-ae0.r2.dl.cox.net [68.1.0.142]<br />
&nbsp;13&nbsp; &nbsp; 21 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 24 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 21 ms&nbsp; langdspt010-ge0330.r2.la.cox.net [68.105.30.30]<br />
<br />
&nbsp;14&nbsp; &nbsp; 68 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 63 ms&nbsp;  148 ms&nbsp; as-1.pat2.pao.yahoo.com [216.115.101.130]<br />
&nbsp;15&nbsp; &nbsp; 64 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 64 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 67 ms&nbsp; as-0.pat1.pao.yahoo.com [216.115.101.128]<br />
&nbsp;16&nbsp; &nbsp; 64 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 64 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 64 ms&nbsp; ae-2.pat2.pao.yahoo.com [216.115.101.33]<br />
&nbsp;17&nbsp; &nbsp; 65 ms&nbsp;  133 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 65 ms&nbsp; ae1-p151.msr2.sp1.yahoo.com [216.115.107.79]<br />
&nbsp;18&nbsp; &nbsp; 66 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 66 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 64 ms&nbsp; te-8-1.bas-a2.sp1.yahoo.com [209.131.32.19]<br />
&nbsp;19&nbsp; &nbsp; 64 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 64 ms&nbsp; &nbsp; 66 ms&nbsp; b1.www.vip.sp1.yahoo.com [209.131.36.159]<br />
<br />
Trace complete.</pre><br />
I have complete IPv4 connectivity. I can ping all major websites, such as google, yahoo, and others. Is anyone else having these problems?</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>Maulth</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread246213.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>News Story Non-Latin domain names predicted to cause trouble in 2010</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/news/story243653.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:17:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[With 2009 coming to an end, it's that time of year when security experts start predicting what the (very near) future will hold in terms of likely threat landscapes. One has bucked the trend of just picking on botnet growth and SEO poisoning, although both are on its list, and instead highlighted...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>With 2009 coming to an end, it's that time of year when security experts start predicting what the (very near) future will hold in terms of likely threat landscapes. One has bucked the trend of just picking on botnet growth and SEO poisoning, although both are on its list, and instead highlighted the dangers of cloud computing and non-Latin domain names.<br />
<br />
In a report predictably called Predictions 2010, <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.m86security.com/" target="_blank">M86 Security</a> reveals its expectations for Web and messaging-based threats for the coming year based upon extensive research into current threat over the past year coupled with an analysis of the major vulnerabilities facing organisations. <br />
<br />
So let's have a look at what popped up when these security experts rubbed their virtual crystal balls shall we?<br />
<br />
1. Setting Sights on SaaS and Cloud Services<br />
<br />
Cloud computing and SaaS have exploded in popularity during 2009, leading to a vast increase in service offerings. As a result, more and more corporate data is being stored outside of the network, making it difficult for IT administrators to have direct control over the data. In 2010, cybercriminals will target the larger cloud-based providers and attacks will increase.<br />
<br />
2. International Domain Name Abuse<br />
<br />
In 2009, ICANN approved the registration of Internationalised Domain Names, enabling the use of non-Latin characters in domain names. As a result, phishing attacks should rise, as cybercriminals can register phony Web sites with URLs that are nearly indistinguishable from legitimate ones.<br />
<br />
3. Evolution of Web Site Infections<br />
<br />
The standard attack vector for cybercriminals is to compromise legitimate Web sites to spread malware. In 2010, the majority of malicious behaviour will reside on legitimate Web sites that have been compromised by various scripts and worms.<br />
 <br />
4. Exploiting Third Party Applications<br />
<br />
Cybercriminals commonly exploit highly deployed third party applications, such as Adobe Flash and Acrobat Reader. The ability to embed one file type in another will result in more complex attacks gaining popularity in 2010, due to the ability to evade detection mechanisms.<br />
 <br />
5. Attacking Application Programming Interfaces<br />
<br />
Social networks such as Twitter and Facebook are extending their services for third party development through the use of application programming interfaces (APIs). There is an implicit level of trust provided through the use of APIs, granting access to user profiles and data, so the threats that target them are likely to increase in 2010.<br />
<br />
6. URL Shortening Services Hide Nefarious Means<br />
<br />
The popularity of Twitter and link sharing has given rise to URL shortening services that reduce the number of characters needed to parse a link. However, these services enable cybercriminals to spread spam and malware by obfuscating the destination of posted links.<br />
<br />
7. Botnets Grow in Sophistication<br />
<br />
Botnets continue to be a major problem, driving the majority of spam output and mass Web site attacks. Botnets have moved away from traditional IRC-based command and control, in favour of HTTP or other custom protocols, utilising Twitter, Google and Facebook.<br />
<br />
8. Continued Rise of Scareware<br />
<br />
Scareware is a traditional tactic that grew popular in the second half of 2009 because its effectiveness. Consumers are prompted to download malicious software through convincingly crafted anti-malware landing pages. In 2010, these attacks should escalate, as the look and feel of scareware pages get updated and criminals find new ways to reach users.<br />
<br />
9. Poisoning Search Engine Results<br />
<br />
A growing trend is the use of Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) techniques to drive users to Web pages hosting malicious code. Also known as SEO poisoning, the technique aims to elevate malicious landing pages in search engine results rankings to ensure a steady supply of victims. The technique is commonly paired with scareware to capitalise on users trust in search engines.</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>happygeek</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread243653.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>News Story Will Google Public DNS become a valuable commercial data mine?</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/news/story243494.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Depending upon the level of your paranoia, Google is either attempting to take over the online world or simply trying to make it a better place in which to work and play. This latest announcement does nothing to clarify these already muddy waters. "As part of our ongoing effort to make the web...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Depending upon the level of your paranoia, Google is either attempting to take over the online world or simply trying to make it a better place in which to work and play. This latest announcement does nothing to clarify these already muddy waters. &quot;As part of our ongoing effort to make the web faster&quot; <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/introducing-google-public-dns.html" target="_blank">says</a> Google Product Manager Prem Ramaswami &quot;we're launching our own public DNS resolver&quot;.<br />
<br />
DNS, the Domain Name System that converts domain names that humans are happy with such as <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.daniweb.com" target="_blank">www.daniweb.com</a> into the Internet Protocol (IP) numbers such as 74.53.219.188 (type it into your browser and it will take you to <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.daniweb.com" target="_blank">www.daniweb.com</a> as if by magic) that computers like.<br />
<br />
For the most part, the average user doesn't give any thought to DNS as it's one of those behind the scenes technical things that make the Internet work. There isn't any need for the average user to even know that DNS exists, let alone how it works or who holds the key to the IP kingdom. But these databases that form the address book of the Internet are hugely important. Which is why DNS distributes the responsibility of how the domain names are assigned and mapped to IP numbers to particular trusted and authoritative name servers for each top level domain. The system works, and on the whole it works well, by being a distributed and fault tolerant beast.<br />
<br />
It has to be, otherwise the Internet would simply crawl to a halt under the strain of the hundreds if not thousands of DNS lookups we all make each and every day. So if it ain't broke, why is Google trying to fix it?<br />
<br />
Ramaswami argues that complex pages requiring multiple DNS lookups before they start loading can &quot;slow down the browsing experience&quot; and that the Google approach is being tweaked in order to &quot;make users' web-surfing experiences faster, safer and more reliable&quot;.<br />
<br />
Google certainly thinks it will be safer, arguing that it will provide <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/security.html" target="_blank">numerous security benefits</a> over existing services which have had their <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.itpro.co.uk/blogs/daveyw/2008/07/09/the-biggest-internet-security-hole-you-never-heard-of/" target="_blank">moments and near misses</a> in recent times. <br />
<br />
And Google certainly thinks it will be faster. &quot;The goal of Google Public DNS is to benefit users worldwide while also helping the tens of thousands of DNS resolvers improve their services, ultimately making the web faster for everyone&quot; Ramaswami concludes.<br />
<br />
It is not a conclusion shared by everyone. Privacy advocates are concerned that by handing over Internet address resolution to Google in this way, taking that away from the ISP, could leave the search giant with the potential to get even more data about where people go when they are online. Google has tried to offset some of these concerns by setting up a privacy policy for Google Public DNS which promises to delete the temporary logs containing IP addresses within 48 hours. The company also points out that the service will not be an authoritative name service and not a top-level domain service either. It's just an alternative, a faster alternative, for those people who want to try something different.  <br />
<br />
I'm not too worried about it myself, not least because I doubt it will prove that successful for one very good reason: reconfiguring DNS is just too much of a hassle for all but the most determined of users. Some have argued that it will likely be the default DNS for the Chrome OS in 2010, and that will speed uptake. But that presumes that Chrome OS will have a great impact in the market, and <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2009/11/23/239414/Google-Chrome-OS-A-threat-to-Windows-7.htm" target="_blank">that itself is questionable</a>.<br />
<br />
I'm more interested to see how the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) responds, and the impact of Google just making such an announcement as this will surely muddy the highly political waters upon which the whole concept of Internet governance floats.</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>happygeek</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread243494.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>News Story Glenn Beck Parody Site Sustained</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/news/story242640.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:52:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Keeping the Internet safe for satire, the World Intellectual Property Organization ruled (http://didglennbeckrapeandmurderayounggirlin1990.com/legal.php) that  the domain name glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com was not a violation of the conservative political commentator's intellectual...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Keeping the Internet safe for satire, the World Intellectual Property Organization <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://didglennbeckrapeandmurderayounggirlin1990.com/legal.php" target="_blank">ruled</a> that  the domain name glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com was not a violation of the conservative political commentator's intellectual property.<br />
<br />
The WIPO <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://reporter.blogs.com/files/decision-d2009-1182.pdf" target="_blank">ruling</a> &quot;dismissed Beck's argument that Internet users could be confused by the domain name and its accompanying Web site,&quot; noted an NPR <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2009/11/glenn_beck_loses_domain_name_d.html?sc=fb&amp;cc=fp" target="_blank">article</a>.  &quot;'Even a 'moron in a hurry,'&quot; read the decision, quoting Eiland-Hall's attorney, &quot;would not likely conclude that Complainant sponsored, endorsed or was affiliated with the website addressed by the disputed domain name.&quot;&quot;<br />
<br />
Indeed, in an excellent example of the <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect" target="_blank">Streisand Effect</a>, Beck's September lawsuit actually brought more attention to the website, noted the site's founder, Isaac Eiland-Hall, in a <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/dear-mr-beck.pdf" target="_blank">letter</a> to Beck upon the WIPO's decision.<br />
<br />
&quot;It bears observing that by bringing the WIPO complaint, you took what was merely one small critique meme, in a seas of internet memes, and turned it into a super-meme,&quot; Eiland-Hall said. &quot;Then, in pressing forward (by not withdrawing the complaint and instead filing additional briefs), you turned the super-meme into an object lesson in First Amendment principles.&quot;<br />
<br />
The point of the website -- riffing upon an August, 2008, <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.fark.com/cgi/comments.pl?IDLink=4608536&amp;IDComment=54042337#c54042337" target="_blank">joke</a> that was itself a reference to a joke about comedian Bob Saget -- was to mock Beck's rhetorical style by accusing him of something that, as former president Lyndon Johnson <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/6562575/fear_and_loathing_campaign_2004/" target="_blank">would have said</a>, the b*****d hadn't denied.<br />
<br />
Upon making his point and winning the case, Eiland-Hall then gave possession of the site to Beck. It has now been taken down, though the <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://didglennbeckrapeandmurderayounggirlin1990.com/" target="_blank">content</a> is still available.</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>slfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread242640.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Decimal Web Address</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread240672.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:09:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[hello ! 
i am shail, and i need  ur favor.. 
i want to access web page using the binary of its ip address.... 
for eg:- www.google.com has ip address 74.125.67.100 & in its binary form it is (01001010.01111101.01000011.01100100) 
when i mention the ip address it redirect me  to google.com but when...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>hello !<br />
i am shail, and i need  ur favor..<br />
i want to access web page using the binary of its ip address....<br />
for eg:- <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">www.google.com</a> has ip address 74.125.67.100 &amp; in its binary form it is (01001010.01111101.01000011.01100100)<br />
when i mention the ip address it redirect me  to google.com but when i mention binary coded ip address in the address bar it displays a error of broken link.<br />
kindly help me out as soon as possible.</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>reach_shailshar</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread240672.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Resolve my static IP from the inside</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread238389.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:13:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello 
 
I'm new and I have a question to submit to you. This is my situation. 
 
I have some company services on one machine that is inside of my lan. I have a static ip (for example: 20.20.20.20) for this and I have setted my dns to accomplish my needs, configuring (always for example) the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hello<br />
<br />
I'm new and I have a question to submit to you. This is my situation.<br />
<br />
I have some company services on one machine that is inside of my lan. I have a static ip (for example: 20.20.20.20) for this and I have setted my dns to accomplish my needs, configuring (always for example) the subdomain &quot;forge.mycompany.com&quot; as A record on my static IP 20.20.20.20.<br />
<br />
Now, all works well from the outside, but from the inside of my lan, if I put in my browser &quot;http://forge.mycompany.com&quot; I can't resolve it.<br />
<br />
I tried adding a &quot;fake&quot; domain zone &quot;mycompany.com&quot; in my internal dns server (based on Bind9 and used to resolve internal addresses on the zone &quot;mycompany.int&quot;), setting a CNAME for &quot;forge.mycompany.com&quot; to &quot;forge.mycompany.int&quot; that I had previously created. Now all seems work also inside my lan, but obviously now I can't resolve all other existing &quot;mycompany.com&quot; subdomains.<br />
<br />
I hope I was clear... Anyone have an idea?<br />
<br />
Thx</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>g0blin79</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread238389.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>URL Intranet</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread236722.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:13:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[hi guys, i made a simple web intranet page..and it's being access by LAN using  the IP Address on the workstation where i configured the IIS. Like http://192.168.0.116/index.html.  
 
My question, instead of typing the machine's IP Address, i'd like to give some URL name. Like...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>hi guys, i made a simple web intranet page..and it's being access by LAN using  the IP Address on the workstation where i configured the IIS. Like <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://192.168.0.116/index.html" target="_blank">http://192.168.0.116/index.html</a>. <br />
<br />
My question, instead of typing the machine's IP Address, i'd like to give some URL name. Like <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://mycompanyintranet.com" target="_blank">http://mycompanyintranet.com</a> something like that. is it possible? if possible can anyone give an idea on how to get started..thank you.  :)</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>cguan_77</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread236722.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>cant access site by web address only by I.P.</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread234421.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:16:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi, 
 
I think this is probabgly something simple but im hosting a site on our work server which is visable to the outside world (ouside our firewall) using the web address e.g. http://www.domainname.com but i cant access inside the firewall but i can access it using the IP address its sitting on. ...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi,<br />
<br />
I think this is probabgly something simple but im hosting a site on our work server which is visable to the outside world (ouside our firewall) using the web address e.g. <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.domainname.com" target="_blank">http://www.domainname.com</a> but i cant access inside the firewall but i can access it using the IP address its sitting on. <br />
<br />
Any ideas?</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>kegathor</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread234421.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DNS backup and restore</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread234024.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi............i am using server 2003. it does not have active directory, just dns server. 
 
i have a primary zone under forward lookup named '' technical ''. 
added some users under technical zone. 
 
taken backup using the command : dnscmd /zoneexport technical backup\technical.dns.bak 
 
it has...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi............i am using server 2003. it does not have active directory, just dns server.<br />
<br />
i have a primary zone under forward lookup named '' technical ''.<br />
added some users under technical zone.<br />
<br />
taken backup using the command : dnscmd /zoneexport technical backup\technical.dns.bak<br />
<br />
it has created a file named '' technical.dns.bak '' under windows/system32/dns/backup.<br />
<br />
now I have deleted the zone technical. How can I restore technical with previous settings..............shakil<br />
<br />
or any step recommended for future dns backup and restore(only dns backup not system state data)</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>shakil_diit</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread234024.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>News Story Stimulus Funding State Internet Mapping, Too</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/news/story234021.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:52:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>In addition to funding broadband projects (http://www.daniweb.com/news/story231771.html) in the states, particularly in rural areas, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the stimulus package, includes funds for collection of state-level broadband data...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>In addition to funding <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.daniweb.com/news/story231771.html" target="_blank">broadband projects</a> in the states, particularly in rural areas, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the stimulus package, includes funds for <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/press/2009/BTOP_mapping_090701.pdf" target="_blank">collection of state-level broadband data</a>, as well as state-wide broadband mapping and planning.<br />
<br />
The project, which will also help create a national broadband map, is being managed by the Department of Commerce's National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA).<br />
<br />
The State Broadband Data and Development Grant Program, announced on July 1, is a competitive, merit-based matching grant program that will provide approximately $240 million in grants to assist states or their designees to develop state-specific data on the deployment levels and adoption rates of broadband services, the NTIA said. Awardees are required to contribute at least 20 percent non-federal matching funds toward project costs.<br />
<br />
Each state could have only a single, eligible entity to perform the mapping. Applications for the program were accepted from July 14 to August 14.<br />
<br />
On September 9, the NTIA <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/press/2009/BTOP_mappingtotals_090909.pdf" target="_blank">announced </a>that it had received applications representing all 50 states, five territories, and the District of Columbia. Fifty-two of the 56 states (or their designated entities) also submitted requests for broadband planning funds, typically about $500,000 each over a 5-year period, the NTIA said, which also released a <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/press/2009/BTOP_applicantlist_090909.pdf" target="_blank">list</a> of the applicants.<br />
<br />
Now, the NTIA is beginning to announce grant awards made to the states for mapping. On October 5, the NTIA <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/press/2009/BTOP_MappingAwards_091005.pdf" target="_blank">announced</a> the first grants:<br />
<ul><li>California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC): approximately $1.8 million</li>
<li>Indiana Office of Technology (IOT): approximately $1.3 million</li>
<li>Rural Economic Development Center, Inc. (e-NC Authority): approximately $1.6 million</li>
<li>Vermont Center for Geographic Information (VCGI): approximately $1.2 million</li>
</ul><br />
The CPUC was also awarded $500,000 for the cost of broadband planning activities in California over four years, bringing its grant award total to approximately $2.3 million, and the e-NC Authority was awarded approximately $435,000 for the cost of broadband planning activities in North Carolina over five years, bringing its grant award total to over $2 million, the NTIA said.<br />
<br />
On October 23, the NTIA <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/press/2009/BTOP_MappingWVgrant_20091023.html" target="_blank">announced</a> a grant of approximately $1.4 million to fund broadband mapping and planning activities in West Virginia. In addition, the West Virginia Geologic and Economic Survey  will receive $185,000 for the cost of broadband planning activities in West Virginia over two years, bringing its grant award total to approximately $1.4 million.<br />
<br />
Other states are waiting to hear responses.<br />
<br />
The national broadband mapping project has come under <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.daniweb.com/news/story220736.html" target="_blank">criticism</a> in recent months for bowing to industry pressure and planning to put less detail in the map.</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>slfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread234021.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>News Story Groups Working to Set Up .Gay Domain</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/news/story233045.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:57:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Two groups are working to set up a .gay top-level Internet domain, with plans for using some of the proceeds for registering sites in that domain to support gay causes, according to an article (http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/competing-groups-press-for-a-gay-internet-suffix/) in the...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Two groups are working to set up a .gay top-level Internet domain, with plans for using some of the proceeds for registering sites in that domain to support gay causes, according to an <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/competing-groups-press-for-a-gay-internet-suffix/" target="_blank">article</a> in the <span style="font-style:italic">New York Times</span>.<br />
<br />
While it can cost up to $400,000 to set up a new top-level domain, companies compete for control, because the <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/select.htm" target="_blank">Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers</a>, which oversees the development and management of the Internet’s unique identifiers, awards the registry rights to just one applicant for each new top-level domain, which can result in millions of dollars per year, the <span style="font-style:italic">Times</span> said.<br />
<br />
Currently, the two groups are competing for the right to apply by each claiming to be more gay than the other. &quot;The Dot Gay Alliance (<a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.dotgay.org/" target="_blank">dotgay.org</a>), out of New York City, is being led by a longtime gay activist,&quot; the <span style="font-style:italic">Times</span> said. &quot;And dotGay (<a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.dotgay.com/" target="_blank">dotgay.com</a>) is being spearheaded by a heterosexual German man in Riga, Latvia, who has incorporated a company in San Francisco.&quot;<br />
<br />
The Dot Gay Alliance points out that it is run by a gay man, while dotGay points out that it is based in San Francisco and that its head has experience setting up new top-level domains.<br />
<br />
Neither of the for-profit groups has said what percentage of revenues it would commit for gay causes, though Joe Dolce, founder and executive director of the Dot Gay Alliance, spoke favorably of Al Gore's declaration that he would support a particular group's right to the .eco top-level domain -- where a <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/29/comapnies-vie-for-control-of-dot-eco/?hp" target="_blank">similar fight</a> is taking place -- only if half the proceeds went to environmental causes.</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>slfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread233045.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>News Story What Broadband Projects are in Line for Stimulus Funding?</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/news/story231771.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:03:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>In the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the stimulus package, Congress appropriated $7.2 billion for broadband grants, loans, and loan guarantees to be administered by the USDA’s Rural Utilities Service (RUS) and the Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunications...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>In the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the stimulus package, Congress appropriated $7.2 billion for broadband grants, loans, and loan guarantees to be administered by the USDA’s Rural Utilities Service (RUS) and the Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). The deadline for submissions was earlier this year.<br />
<br />
Now, you can <a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/applications/search.cfm" target="_blank">search the database yourself</a> to find what projects were submitted.<br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow" class="t" href="http://blog.endeavourpartners.net/2009/09/21/broadband-stimulus-28-billion-dollars-in-applications-chasing-7-2-billion-dollars-in-funding-%E2%80%93-including-alaska%E2%80%99s-new-and-improved-underwater-bridge-to-nowhere/" target="_blank">Endeavour Partners</a>, a consulting company, downloaded the data to see what it could find out about the proposals.<br />
<br />
First of all, $28 billion in requests was submitted for $7.2 billion in funding.<br />
<br />
Other observations include:<ul><li>2,186 applications were received</li>
<li>The average application size was $12.7 million, but the median application size was $2.7 million</li>
<li>Alaska had the largest total dollar amount requested, at $1.3 billion</li>
<li>The largest application was from RADgov, a proposal to build and connect computer learning centers in underserved communities across the US for $938 million</li>
<li>The top 10 states requesting the most money were California, Florida, Colorado, Alaska, New York, Texas, Virginia, Missouri, Maryland, and Illinois.</li>
<li>The top 10 states requesting the most money per capita were Alaska, the District of Columbia, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Hawaii, Vermont, Colorado, New Mexico, and Maryland.</li>
</ul><br />
While a number of the top 10 per capita states actually are laggards in terms of broadband availability, &quot;three of the top 10 states ranked on funding requests per capita are in the top 10 for actual broadband performance:  Rhode Island, the District of Columbia, and Maryland,&quot; the group said. &quot;These are all densely populated areas with meaningful broadband competition.&quot;<br />
<br />
Awards for this first round are expected to be announced in November.<br />
<br />
&quot;It will be interesting to see how the process plays out – if awards will be made to a few large, pork barrel projects or if dollars will be carefully allocated to the rural states and areas where broadband economics break down and private sector competition is likely to remain weak,&quot; Endeavour concluded.</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>slfisher</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread231771.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>cant ping hostname</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread229691.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:52:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi, 
 
I have 2 machines on my network and a router.  
my router is 192.168.1.1 and my machines are: 
darkstar 192.168.1.15 (Ubuntu) 
dazlaptop 192.168.1.16 (WXP) 
 
These two machines share files and work, and when i am in windows XP i can go to the folder directory \\darkstar\ and it opens.  
...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi,<br />
<br />
I have 2 machines on my network and a router. <br />
my router is 192.168.1.1 and my machines are:<br />
darkstar 192.168.1.15 (Ubuntu)<br />
dazlaptop 192.168.1.16 (WXP)<br />
<br />
These two machines share files and work, and when i am in windows XP i can go to the folder directory \\darkstar\ and it opens. <br />
<br />
But when i type ping darkstar it says this:<br />
Pinging darkstar [172.16.142.1] with 32 bytes of data:<br />
<br />
Request timed out. <br />
Request timed out.<br />
Request timed out.<br />
Request timed out.<br />
<br />
This is stupid because i can ping darkstar (192.168.1.15) and it works.<br />
<br />
But i cant use the hostname.<br />
<br />
So i tried flushing the dns. <br />
ipconfig /flushdns<br />
<br />
and it still does the same thing, I have no idea where it got this 172 B class network address from. <br />
<br />
If I try it vice versa it still wont ping.<br />
<br />
daz@darkstar:~$ ping dazlaptop<br />
^C<br />
daz@darkstar:~$ ping 192.168.1.16<br />
PING 192.168.1.16 (192.168.1.16) 56(84) bytes of data.<br />
64 bytes from 192.168.1.16: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=1.48 ms<br />
64 bytes from 192.168.1.16: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=1.23 ms<br />
^C<br />
--- 192.168.1.16 ping statistics ---<br />
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms<br />
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.231/1.355/1.480/0.129 ms<br />
<br />
So it works Via IP, and for some reason samba works fine, but I have no clue why it wont let me flush the dns and let me use the hostname.<br />
<br />
Also it only does this sometimes after the machines have been restarted.<br />
<br />
Any ideaS?</div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>Dazaa</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread229691.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Restrict DNS to Respond Only for Our Domains</title>
			<link>http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread227982.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi, 
 
I would like to look at restricting our external DNS servers to only respond for the domains that we own. Firstly, I would like to ask if this is the convention, or does everybody set their DNS to answer all queries for everyone? 
 
Assuming not, we will still want our externals to do...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi,<br />
<br />
I would like to look at restricting our external DNS servers to only respond for the domains that we own. Firstly, I would like to ask if this is the convention, or does everybody set their DNS to answer all queries for everyone?<br />
<br />
Assuming not, we will still want our externals to do recursive lookups for our internal traffic so we will need an ACL to identify internal networks and allow recursion.<br />
<br />
Would I also need a 'zone &quot;.&quot; recursion no' stanza, so that all other traffic will be denied or would the ACL be enough? <br />
<br />
Looking at my named.conf, it looks like it has been set up like this in the past, but this has been commented out.<br />
<br />
named.conf: (truncated)<br />
 <pre style="margin:20px; line-height:13px">acl dns_servers { internal_dns_ip; internal_dns_ip; };<br />
<br />
options {<br />
&nbsp; directory &quot;/var/named&quot; ;<br />
&nbsp; allow-query { any; };<br />
#&nbsp; allow-query { dns_servers; 127.0.0.1; };<br />
#&nbsp; allow-recursion { dns_servers; 127.0.0.1; };<br />
&nbsp; allow-recursion { any; };<br />
&nbsp; allow-transfer { none; };<br />
&nbsp; allow-notify {master_dns_ip; };<br />
&nbsp; listen-on-v6 { none; };<br />
&nbsp; recursive-clients 3500;<br />
&nbsp; version none;<br />
&nbsp; zone-statistics yes;<br />
&nbsp; notify no;<br />
&nbsp; auth-nxdomain no;<br />
&nbsp; };<br />
<br />
view external {<br />
&nbsp; match-clients { any; };<br />
<br />
&nbsp; zone &quot;orgname.com&quot; {<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; type slave;<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; file &quot;/var/named/slave/external/orgname.com&quot;;<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; masters { master_dns_ip; };<br />
&nbsp; allow-notify { master_dns_ip; };<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; allow-query { any; };<br />
&nbsp; };<br />
<br />
&nbsp; ... more zones ...<br />
};</pre></div> ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum150.html">Domains and DNS</category>
			<dc:creator>unixanalyst</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread227982.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
