If you're so ignorant about Windows architecture and versions, what qualifies you to make statements like "p stands for patch"?
No need to politically correct anti-Microsoft rants here kid.
Windows 98 is by now 7 years old, it's end of life.
In other words: don't use it, use XP which is a lot more stable and secure (plus ever more software will simply not run or not run properly on Winddows 98).
As to your real question, I don't know the internal architecture of that software but it may well be built using .NET technology. It's a good platform to work on for building Windows applications and for the next Windows version will be the preferred architecture with only legacy support available for traditional programming models.
jwenting
duckman
8,392 posts since Nov 2004
Reputation Points: 1,662
Solved Threads: 337