SORRY my time had expired on edits:
First I appreciate the additional comments.
My response, perhaps differently than you assess it, was a reaction to being cut off by a second party who obviously had not read the question, seemed to terminate the discussion - while Nav33 had the situation throughly in hand. I accept that my statement of the problem may have created some dissonance but I do not accept Omni sending me a direct threat via PM as a result of my reaction to his interruption.
This kind of conduct is childish, unprofessional, illegal and disrespectful of what I saw as Nav33's proven (from reviews of other situations where he has provided help) ability to be helpful, knowledgeable and professional . There is nothing I said that would permit OmniX, who in my view added nothing but an additional layer of unnecessary confusion to issue a physical threat to me because he didn't like my statement. My assessment of the tone and content of everyone else who has communicated in this question is that it is proper, and professional - My assessment of Omnix is the opposite of the other members. Adults can and should have the ability to disagree without threats. Simply put, I will not stand for people to issue physical threats via the internet under the guise of "help".
I am not a programmer and sought only to get an answer to something most people indicate is simple and that I should be able to get an answer to and do myself. Certainly my statement of the issue could have been more accurate.
Clearly his remark "Plus I did it in an Intellectual actual manner imo rather than flaming him as I would have usually done, so im proud for my own self control" Shows rather a lack of intellect and self control. I do not think an adult boasting such qualities would send letters threating to kick someones head in. To write this publicly, then send me a threat shows he is a best a delusional, ignorant liar. Few would find what he wrote intellectual. I will say this I did not threaten him and while my criticism was harsh he did not address the elements of my critique - he issued a threat. I managed a marketing department for Montgomery Ward which at time was one of the largest corporations in the world. There are NO situations where an associate of the company,regardless of their rank, would issue a threat to a customer - period. That he would write the ameliorative remarks above as a cover then brags that he would usually "flame" complaints, shows his true character and intention and gives foundation for my original assessment of his intent.
Once again thanks to you all except for OmniX. In my view a person whose carries such a chip on his shoulder is not prepared to handle what I see as a knowledge-based customer service function - what threaten everyone who doesn't like the service - come on. I have responded to his threat and cc'd his superiors (I have copied these pages and send a link to them also). It is a shame that the other professionals here have to put with this.
Finally, my intent is not to "flame" anyone - I work in an environment where professionals have the intelligence and skill to directly state their issue. For the purpose of accurately identifying and correcting the issue and for that purpose alone - not to create some grade school war of words. While OmniX makes threats he claims I'd have to face in the real world - in the real world, in a business, when faced with opposition, difference of ideas, disagreement and lacking of skill to make your case in a manner more effective than threats - you probably won't remain employable long. As to OminX remarks as to "intellect" which he apparently sees as schoolyard namecalling, I will let the content of the dialog stand for itself.
J
Peter_budo - I guess more properly stated I was also trying to identify the actual variable name, its state (contents).
My intention was to create an if then else statement that would detect if the user was a guest or not (logged on or not). If not logged on nothing would be done, if logged on a message would be displayed.
Part of my confusion is that I was aware of a variable named $user_data[?] and have seen it in code snippets. I was trying to determine the correct variable and it's contents. Nav's original response (to my eyes) while displaying the if structure did not clarify what was the correct name of the variables involved.