943,765 Members | Top Members by Rank

Web Development > Web Design > HTML and CSS > W3C Validation
Ad:
You are currently viewing page 1 of this multi-page discussion thread
Permalink
Jan 12th, 2004
0

W3C Validation

Expand Post »
Dani... I'm disappointed in you.

Results of Webpage Validation

Similar Threads
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 63
Solved Threads: 6
Supreme Evil Overlord
Roberdin is offline Offline
282 posts
since Feb 2003
Permalink
Jan 12th, 2004
0

Re: W3C Validation

Quote originally posted by Roberdin ...
Dani... I'm disappointed in you.

Results of Webpage Validation

its just one tag that probally hasnt been updated in a while
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 96
Solved Threads: 21
The Geek Father
Zachery is offline Offline
781 posts
since Nov 2003
Permalink
Jan 12th, 2004
0

Re: W3C Validation

So what is the XHTML-compliant version of the li tag? To make the bullets??
Administrator
Staff Writer
Reputation Points: 1422
Solved Threads: 162
The Queen of DaniWeb
cscgal is offline Offline
13,645 posts
since Feb 2002
Permalink
Jan 12th, 2004
0

Re: W3C Validation

Ahh, I see .... I need something else to start my list. Gotcha.
Administrator
Staff Writer
Reputation Points: 1422
Solved Threads: 162
The Queen of DaniWeb
cscgal is offline Offline
13,645 posts
since Feb 2002
Permalink
Jan 12th, 2004
0

Re: W3C Validation

It's fixed but oh my goodness gracious http://www.techtalkforums.com has a whole lotta problems and I don't know how to fix all of them
Administrator
Staff Writer
Reputation Points: 1422
Solved Threads: 162
The Queen of DaniWeb
cscgal is offline Offline
13,645 posts
since Feb 2002
Permalink
Jan 13th, 2004
0

Re: W3C Validation

Dani, I think your web site is fine. There's not at least ONE COOL LOOKING web site that's feature rich that can pass any sort of validation. Web sites that pass validation are web sites like http://www.useit.com/ or http://www.w3.org - but they're boring, ugly, and have no where near the functionality that a site like this has.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 262
Solved Threads: 18
a.k.a inscissor
samaru is offline Offline
1,227 posts
since Feb 2002
Permalink
Jan 13th, 2004
0

Re: W3C Validation

I hate to say, but in my experience, it seems that only programmers, who rarely have graphic abilities, are interested in validation. I should know, I'm a programmer. Then again, I'm a graphic designer too.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 262
Solved Threads: 18
a.k.a inscissor
samaru is offline Offline
1,227 posts
since Feb 2002
Permalink
Jan 13th, 2004
0

Re: W3C Validation

Quote originally posted by inscissor ...
I hate to say, but in my experience, it seems that only programmers, who rarely have graphic abilities, are interested in validation. I should know, I'm a programmer. Then again, I'm a graphic designer too.
i dunno my site should pass all w3c validations includeing CSS and XHTML 1.0 and it looks purdy damn nice >.<
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 96
Solved Threads: 21
The Geek Father
Zachery is offline Offline
781 posts
since Nov 2003
Permalink
Jan 13th, 2004
0

Re: W3C Validation

Quote originally posted by inscissor ...
Dani, I think your web site is fine. There's not at least ONE COOL LOOKING web site that's feature rich that can pass any sort of validation. Web sites that pass validation are web sites like http://www.useit.com/ or http://www.w3.org - but they're boring, ugly, and have no where near the functionality that a site like this has.
All sites should and can pass validation with a few tweaks. It's a highly useful tool that means your site will dispaly correctly on a wealth of browsers.
The default style of most forum software is written to pass validation.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 63
Solved Threads: 6
Supreme Evil Overlord
Roberdin is offline Offline
282 posts
since Feb 2003
Permalink
Jan 13th, 2004
0

Re: W3C Validation

Quote originally posted by Roberdin ...
All sites should and can pass validation with a few tweaks. It's a highly useful tool that means your site will dispaly correctly on a wealth of browsers.
The default style of most forum software is written to pass validation.
I agree with the word should. There are other things that also SHOULD be. Software should be free. Software should not have bugs. Software should be super optimized. Why isn't this always the case? Green little pieces of paper?

I know what you mean. But from a business perspective, sometimes this can't happen. Time is money, and validating and making sure everything is too perfect adds another layer of time to your project. This can be a tedious task when working with complex web sites and just can't happen.
Team Colleague
Reputation Points: 262
Solved Threads: 18
a.k.a inscissor
samaru is offline Offline
1,227 posts
since Feb 2002

This thread is solved

Either the thread starter or a moderator has marked this thread as solved. You can most likely trust the responses and answers given. There is most likely no reason for any further responses to be posted here. If you have a related question, please start a new thread in this forum instead.

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
Message:
Previous Thread in HTML and CSS Forum Timeline: fixed divs
Next Thread in HTML and CSS Forum Timeline: how to modify blogger template css?





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC