hello,
i was looking at a program someone wrote.
I saw something like that:
name = (char*) strdup(path);
strdup already returns char *, so why do we need casting here?
did he do a wrong thing or am i wrong?
xyzt
6
Light Poster
Recommended Answers
Jump to PostOnly that strdup() isn't a portable function.
All 4 Replies
William Hemsworth
1,339
Posting Virtuoso
He didn't do anything "wrong" as such, but there isn't any need to cast it.
Salem
5,138
Posting Sage
Only that strdup() isn't a portable function.
Tom Gunn
1,164
Practically a Master Poster
Without more code to look at, I can only guess. But my guess is that he didn't include the right header for strdup and casted the result to silence his compiler's warnings about it.
xyzt
6
Light Poster
thanks very much for the answers.
Be a part of the DaniWeb community
We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.