Hi,
In below code snippet , can anyone let me know how to print the functor value output (3,4,5,6,7) without
embedding add function in class.
#include<iostream>
#include<vector>
#include<algorithm>
using namespace std;
void add ( int i)
{
i=i+2;
}
int main()
{
vector <int> vec ={1,2,3,4,5};
for_each(vec.begin(), vec.end(),add);
for (auto i:vec)
{
cout<<i;
}
return 1;
}
Jump to PostCould you elaborate on your question?
Jump to PostI'm pretty sure the standard says something about modifying the value past to the function in for_each(). If you want to change a value past to a function then I would investigate the transform() function.
Oops. My bad, I was thinking about something else. Please ignore.
Jump to PostThis is done simply with the for_each loop plus lammbda.
#include<iostream> #include<vector> #include<algorithm> using namespace std; int main() { vector <int> vec ={1,2,3,4,5}; for_each(vec.begin(), vec.end(),[](int &c){ cout << c+2 <<endl;}); return 1; } ## out put 3 4 5 6 7Happy? ))
Could you elaborate on your question?
you need to pass reference instead of value . Give a try it will work
void add ( int &i)
{
i=i+2;
}
I'm pretty sure the standard says something about modifying the value past to the function in for_each(). If you want to change a value past to a function then I would investigate the transform() function.
Oops. My bad, I was thinking about something else. Please ignore.
This is done simply with the for_each loop plus lammbda.
#include<iostream>
#include<vector>
#include<algorithm>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
vector <int> vec ={1,2,3,4,5};
for_each(vec.begin(), vec.end(),[](int &c){ cout << c+2 <<endl;});
return 1;
}
## out put
3
4
5
6
7
Happy? ))
Is there any particular reason you're using for_each when you already have C++11's range based for loops available? Is it part of an assignment that your add() function has to exist? The following would be easier.
for(auto& i : vec)
i += 2;
for(auto i : vec)
cout << i;
Thanks for your apply. why cant we use below expression with for loop.
even it works with for_eac.
for(string i:vecs,add)
{
cout<<i;
}
Because that's not the syntax for range-based for loop. I can't imagine it would work with for_each either because you're iterating through strings, and your add() functions operates on and int.
The for_each and lambda is clearly superior in the solution of this task. plain and simple ))
The for_each and lambda is clearly superior in the solution of this task. plain and simple ))
Why? for doesn't even require you to write a function.
Why? for doesn't even require you to write a function.
Because it is robust, compact , no error prone, easy to read and efficient.
Thats according to the task before us currently.
Understood?
We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.