Search DaniWeb - associativity

Associativity and Cache 16 Years Ago by shaqnolysis … Cache....I really wanted to compare the impact of Associativity on miss rate with cache associativities of 1 , 2 …block sizes to remain the same,how does increasing cache associativity affects the tag,index and offset fields sizes? I… been reading about Associativity and Cache but i found those problems a lil … Re: Associativity of operators in c 14 Years Ago by 9868 …precedence but then why should I not apply the associativity rule because it imposes an order of evaluation of… I right?? Can someone give an example in which associativity rules are applied for the function call operator ??[/QUOTE]… Yes, associativity is applied only if you have operators of same… Re: Associativity of operators in c 14 Years Ago by compubaba …+b)+c if left to right associativity is assumed . Do u mean that associativity rules are applied if an operand competes… precedence but then why should I not apply the associativity rule because it imposes an order of evaluation of … I right?? Can someone give an example in which associativity rules are applied for the function call operator ?? Associativity of operators in c 14 Years Ago by compubaba What exactly is meant of by associativity(right to left / left to right) mentioned on p53 of … mentioned that () has the highest precedence and left to right associativity. Why isn`t that it is guaranteed that f is…. If this is not the right place to apply the associativity rules , please help me with an example so as to… Re: Associativity of operators in c 14 Years Ago by ithelp You took a wrong example a + b + c will be interpreted as (a+b) +c if left to right associativity is assumed. associativity of operators 14 Years Ago by niroop can anybody explain me in detail about the associativity of operators plz.... Re: associativity of operators 14 Years Ago by TotoTitus … non-associative operations can have a [I]form[/I] of associativity. 8-4-2 is not equal to 8 - (4 -2… applying leftmost associativity rule and Math.pow ( exponentiation ) 11 Years Ago by kb2k8 …^ /,* -,+ = Operators with the same application order should follow the Leftmost Associativity Rule. 2. v = 3 * 10 *2 / 15 – 2 …^ /,* -,+ = Operators with the same application order should follow the Leftmost Associativity Rule. 3. v = r ^ s * t / u – v…= Operators with the same application order should follow the Leftmost Associativity Rule. Re: ++ and * associativity 14 Years Ago by Dave Sinkula …;961177]My understanding is that because ++ and * have right-associativity[/QUOTE]Associativity? I don't even think you got that right if… Re: ++ and * associativity 14 Years Ago by 9868 [QUOTE=Dave Sinkula;961225]Associativity? I don't even think you got that right if you were trying to say precedence. [/QUOTE] Isn't the precedence of * and ++ same, that's why we look for the associativity in *p++ whcih is right to left. Pointer Manipulation and Associativity 14 Years Ago by rcbhat … try to do x=++*p++, the program crashes. If my associativity rules are right, first the address pointed to by p… ++ and * associativity 14 Years Ago by dumbncool Hi, CAn anyone tell me what does the following statement do in C. [icode]*p++ = val[/icode] My understanding is that because ++ and * have right-associativity, it is equivalent to [code=C] p++; *p=val; [/code] Similarly [icode]val = *--p[/icode] is equivalent to [code=C] p--; val = *p; [/code] Is it correct? Re: ++ and * associativity 14 Years Ago by Narue [B]>Associativity? I don't even think you got that right if … operator precedence & associativity 13 Years Ago by gear26926 Cud any1 let me know how this code works with respect to pecedence and associativity Thanks in advance[code]#include <stdio.h> main() { int i = -3, j = 2, k = 0, m; m = ++i && ++j || ++k; printf ("\n %d %d %d %d", i,j,k,m); }[/code] operator precendence and associativity in c 11 Years Ago by starkk main() { int x=20,y=35; x=y++ + x++; y= ++y + ++x; printf(“%d%dn”,x,y); } what would be the output? can some one explain it with associativity and operator precendence hit/miss cache simulator 14 Years Ago by FotG … size in bytes, a counter, and associativity, which if isn't given is DMC…size(_size), hCount(hm), blockSZ(blSize), associativity( assoc) { size /= blockSZ; sets = size/associativity; for (int i = 0 ; i…< sets; i++) { nWCache[i] = new FullyAblock(associativity,blockSZ); } } [/code] Then I have code thats argument… Java Expression Parser & Calculator 11 Years Ago by binaryjc …java.util.*; public class ExpressionParser { // Associativity constants for operators private static final int …return OPERATORS.containsKey(token); } // Test associativity of operator token private static boolean isAssociative(String… C standard semantics ambiguity related question 16 Years Ago by Metahuman … rule in Standard C semantics... it's not related to associativity ..................... This makes it even more confusing mathematical expressions involving pointers 10 Years Ago by cppgangster … pointers. I think it has to do with precedence and associativity, but I have now clue what is wrong. The brakets… Re: && and || precendance 10 Years Ago by Banfa …, that is in the line `a = b + c;` the associativity of the 2 operators, right-to-left for = and left… to && but the || operator is evaluated first. Associativity defines the order in which operators are evaluated (and therefore… them) in `a + b + c` + has left-to-right associativity and therefore the left hand + is evauluated first and b… Re: Beginner's Tutorial on Operators 9 Years Ago by Learner010 …have to solve the expression by keeping the associativity rules in mind. Associativity means that how operator will be executed ?(…while , I tell you that`/,*`has left to right associativity . it means that the expression will be evaluating from… I desined an image which depict the precedence and associativity.But i can't attach the image here.So … Re: Understanding a statement of Dennis Ritchie's book on the order of evaluation 14 Years Ago by daudiam …evaluation undefined, or will the > > rules of associativity force f()+g() to be evaluated first ? > >… functions will be called. This is somewhat different from associativity, which is what I think is causing your confusion…was in `f()+g()+h()` due to the left-right associativity of the '+' operator, the leftmost '+' is evaluated first… Re: Mathematical Expression Evaluator 11 Years Ago by bguild …Precedence can be different on either side to allow for associativity */ public Operator(String name, int leftPrecedence, int rightPrecedence…lt;V> top = operatorStack.getFirst(); // Assume left-associativity // Use (top.rightUsage().precedence() > nextPrecedence) to assume … Re: Incrementing a vectors element? 18 Years Ago by JoBe … a [b]lot[/b] of people have trouble with the associativity of operators that have equal precedence. It's right to… because you allready gave it --> because of the dereferencing (associativity of operators)? Re: Streaming and member function operator order of precedence 16 Years Ago by snorri I could be wrong, but I thought associativity was more to do with what the compiler does when … don't have to return any particular type. However...the associativity of the operator is something that I dont think you… Re: Audio trouble 15 Years Ago by kpecker …Type Internal Status Enabled Operational Mode Varies with Memory Address Associativity 4-way Set-Associative Maximum Size 8 KB Installed… Re: right to left associative 15 Years Ago by ArkM … or int+object do not bear a relation to associativity. Left/right associativity is: [code] x ? y ? z evaluated as ((x ? y… Re: Binary Expression Tree 14 Years Ago by Duki … case of input such as: 2 ^ 3 ^ 4, the left associativity should be used. In any case with subsequent ^, right… Re: Binary Expression Tree 14 Years Ago by Narue … case of input such as: 2 ^ 3 ^ 4, the left associativity should be used >used. In any case with subsequent… ^, right associativity should be (e.g., ^ ^ 2 3 4). Then I'd… Re: Understanding a statement of Dennis Ritchie's book on the order of evaluation 14 Years Ago by Narue … order of evaluation undefined, or will the >rules of associativity force f()+g() to be evaluated first ?[/B] I think… the functions will be called. This is somewhat different from associativity, which is what I think is causing your confusion. Also…