Search DaniWeb - mysql_error

Re: Online subission forms not sending emails of submitted info 3 Days Ago by david.tigner This one is becoming more perplexing. After adding in the PHPMailer coding, page would crash (e.g. blank white screen, HTML file that would display the screen doesn't even start at all, e.g. error in the 1st running PHP file). Adding the semi-colon at end of line 18 (in previously discussed code) did not work and funny thing is, the original coding… Re: Online subission forms not sending emails of submitted info 1 Day Ago by Chris_103 It seems like you're experiencing issues with PHP-based email functionality, where submissions are not triggering emails to be sent. Let's dive into the code snippet you provided and see if we can identify any potential issues or improvements. Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 3 Weeks Ago by Biiim I realise this has been marked as solved, but I wanted to make it known that the HAVING clause runs on the returned result set of your query, which as you say has no indexes on it as it is just a temporarily created result set - but has the benefit of allowing you do do some simple post-processing on the result set. (This is for MariaDB at least)… Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 3 Weeks Ago by Biiim > I don't have experience with MariaDB, but in MySQL, something like that will work as long as I do SELECT sum(points) AS total FROM ... HAVING total > 10. Is that what you were getting at? Kind of, MariaDB is a fork of MySQL from around 2009 or something like that, MySQL 5.* and the creator continued developing MariaDB and Oracle took … Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 2 Weeks Ago by toneewa I'm a little late to the party, however, I want to share my experience learning MySQL in the past day. I setup a server, a database, and wrote a C++ program to connect to it. It measures the times for 3 SELECTs. The whole product list, using HAVING, and WHERE. I also tested reversing the orders. Query execution time: 0.0002336 seconds … Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 3 Weeks Ago by Dani > SELECT sum(points) total FROM ... HAVING points > 10 I don't have experience with MariaDB, but in MySQL, something like that will work as long as I do `SELECT sum(points) AS total FROM ... HAVING total > 10`. Is that what you were getting at? As far as what I was trying to accomplish that provoked this question, I was working on a … Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 2 Weeks Ago by toneewa I know when you don't use aggregate calculations use WHERE. Producing the same results can be done. I added another test with MAX(Price). With a database over 305K rows, 3 columns, MySQL Workbench is unstable importing. Took over 2 hours. WHERE is faster, and should be used, when no functions are needed. WHERE Query execution time: 0.… Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 2 Weeks Ago by Biiim > INSERT INTO electronics.products(ProductID, ProductName, Price) VALUES ('1','capacitors', 2.50), ('2','resistors', 4.50), ('3','rectifiers', 7.50), ('4','diodes', 10.00), ('5','ICs', 25.00), ... ('50000','...', ...); I don't see any mention of an index on it & your benchmark indicates you don't have one: ALTER TABLE `… Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 2 Weeks Ago by toneewa I added your mentioned alter table index. Took 4.375 secs in MySQL Workbench. It did speed up the results. I'll have to try another method of importing to see if I can improve this. I also ommitted the overhead of converting variables for display output measurements, because they were included in the C++ times. If we were to compare the two, it as … Mariadb10.11.6 Glarea single failed node startup stuck failure 2 Weeks Ago by mx_983 Basic background information Mariadb Ver 15.1 District 10.11.6 MariaDB Glarea cluster, one with three nodes: Node1:192.168.18.78 Node2: 192.168.18.79 Node3: 192.168.18.80 Among them, Node1 node was restarted after a power outage of 1 hour, and after executing the system ctl start mariadb, it was stuck for a long time (running for 6 hours) … Using Natural Language to Query SQL Databases with Python LangChain Module 2 Weeks Ago by usmanmalik57 The advent of large language models (LLM) has replaced complex scripts with natural language for automating various tasks. You can now use LLM to interact with your databases using natural language, which makes life easier for people who do not have sufficient SQL knowledge. In this article, you will learn how to retrieve information from SQL … Re: How can I upload a tar.bz2 file to openstack swift object storage container 3 Weeks Ago by Hanginium65 Good day, Salem. My apologies for taking so long to reply to your suggestion. I refactored my code to read the contents of the tar.bz2 file and then pass them as a file-like object to the 'put_object' and also to change the content type for the file transfer to "application/octet-stream". The first was sent through to object storage … Re: Online subission forms not sending emails of submitted info 2 Weeks Ago by Dani > After code changed, not only will still not send email but screen turns blank white. That's a PHP fatal error. It could be a syntax error, or it could also be that PHPMailer is not in the location you're telling PHP to look. Do you have any way of accessing the error log? Without access to the server, perhaps through a web-based control … Re: How can I upload a tar.bz2 file to openstack swift object storage container 3 Weeks Ago by Salem I don't understand why you need to extract all the files from the compressed `tar.bz2` just to upload to a backup. Also, line 69 is now meaningless having just posted only a snippet of the code. Before the error, what was the last `logger.info` message? Re: Online subission forms not sending emails of submitted info 2 Weeks Ago by david.tigner More problems. I incorporated the coding Biiim provided. Before any changes, after submission, would display the correct (yellow) screen. After code changed, not only will still not send email but screen turns blank white. URL provider, IONOS, told me that the Host is smtp.ionos.com and the Username and password are for an email address associated … Re: Online subission forms not sending emails of submitted info 2 Weeks Ago by Biiim Hi David, > More problems. I incorporated the coding Biiim provided. Before any changes, after submission, would display the correct (yellow) screen. After code changed, not only will still not send email but screen turns blank white. URL provider, IONOS, told me that the Host is smtp.ionos.com and the Username and password are for an email… Re: ASUS Laptops - my experience 3 Weeks Ago by Reverend Jim >I consider them all bloatware Something I may try on this laptop (old ASUS K53E) once I get my other one back is a fresh install from USB but selecting "World" as my region. I read somewhere a while back that if you select any specific region, bloatware for that region gets installed, but if you pick World then no bloatware. You … Re: ASUS Laptops - my experience 3 Weeks Ago by toneewa > Ever had to install Windows from 39 floppy disks? It was not fun, especially when disk 39 frequently had a read error. Not that many, I still have them. Highest was 6 for booting, so I could read a CD. I wrote on them, "BAD" if ever had that problem. > I actually tried this as well, running diskpart.exe. It couldn't see … Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 3 Weeks Ago by Reverend Jim Was it worth all that for 50ms? Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 3 Weeks Ago by Dani In exchange for less than a day's worth of work? Of course!!!!! I've spent a *lot* longer to shave off a *lot* less. https://www.conductor.com/academy/page-speed-resources/faq/amazon-page-speed-study/ Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 3 Weeks Ago by Dani Now as far as whether going down that rabbit hole that day was worth the cost of losing AndreRet, then I'd have to give a resounding no. Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 3 Weeks Ago by Reverend Jim I have to admit that 95% of my work from 1995 to 2008 was back end stuff where I didn't have to worry about stuff like that. Digital plumbing and monitoring. The other 5% was single user apps. Not counting the 20% which was pointless meetings. So if you don't mind explaining, I'm curious as to why 50ms would even be noticible. I'm not asking just … Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 3 Weeks Ago by Dani I'm too exhausted for an in depth explanation right now but 90% of web development is optimizing for performance. The average DaniWeb page takes anywhere from 80ms up to 250ms to load the HTML (when dealing with low network latency), depending on the type of page, so shaving 50ms off of that is a huge win. Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 3 Weeks Ago by Dani Here are some articles that can explain it in greater depth: * https://web.dev/learn/performance/why-speed-matters * https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/Performance * https://web.dev/explore/fast The HTML page must be downloaded in its entirety before the web browser can begin loading anything else (CSS, Javascript, images, etc.)… Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 3 Weeks Ago by Reverend Jim I suppose I am looking at it in terms of practicality. I suppose there might be several reasons to optimize: 1. It saves resources on the hosting platform 2. It improves the user experience 3. It provides personl satisfaction Point #1 would save you money if the savings were significant. Point #2 would apply if the improvement was … Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 3 Weeks Ago by Dani > Point #2 would apply if the improvement was noticible but I doubt anyone could seriously comment, "I think this page rendered 50ms faster than it used to", especially considering all the other things that affect timing, for example, the current loading on my ISP servers, anything else running on my computer or home network, etc. … Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 3 Weeks Ago by Dani > I know that in my experience, OR's are very bad for speed you can get away with a few but they can get very bad when they stop the whole query making use of one of the main indexes, you can actually speed it up by moving the or's into the HAVING usually. Thank you for that tip! I never thought of that, but it totally makes sense!! > … Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 2 Weeks Ago by Dani But you're not comparing apples to apples. Your WHERE query and your HAVING query perform different calculations and do different things. In one, you're plucking out all the rows with a price greater than $4, and then calculating an average price for each product. In the other, you're plucking out *all* rows, calculating an average price for each … Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 2 Weeks Ago by toneewa Correct. It wasn't about displaying the results, but to measure the different clauses. I'm not impressed by only 95 INSERTs/sec, and a maximum write speed of 175 KB/s for importing data. Increasing to 50K shows WHERE to be faster. 50K: WHERE Query execution time: 0.0599129 seconds HAVING Query execution time: 0.0621748 … Re: Improve HAVING BY performance 2 Weeks Ago by Dani I think you might be missing my point. If you’re fetching different data, there’s no way of saying whether where or having is faster. You would need to write queries that use each, but retrieve the same data, to see which is faster for a use case. Even then, it totally depends on the data in the database itself. The same query can be fast for some …