>Basically, what is the best lap top computer I can get for $1699.00?
That's a very subjective question to which there is no correct answer.
>I've heard that I should go with an Apple because they have less
>problems than Windows based systems.
Macs are fairly reliable, but that doesn't mean there aren't reliable PC brands available, too.
>I am totally scared of Windows Vista
There aren't very many PC manufacturers that still sell laptops with Windows XP preinstalled.
You'll probably want to take a look at the Apple MacBook. It's $1250 USD, I believe, and it has decent built-in wireless capability, comes preinstalled with the DVD authoring tool iDVD, although you might be a little disappointed with the battery life you get from using it. For me, I get around 2 hours under heavy usage, maybe 4 if I'm doing something simple like word processing. Oh, and the hardware aspect of it is excellent. Never had a problem.
Another brand that is fairly decent are the Sony laptops. Acer and Dell are also worth a peek, too.
John A
Vampirical Lurker
7,630 posts since Apr 2006
Reputation Points: 2,240
Solved Threads: 339
Macbooks suck.. Vista is too buggy now.. I would try to stick with XP pro, if at all possible. Check out newegg.com or bestbuy.com and look at their laptops.. On newegg, you can search for the components you want (amd processor, 802.11g cards, 2 gigs of ram, 200 gig hd, etc.. are the specs that I would look for)
I would personally go with hp, I've used their laptops in the past, and I think they are very reliable.. or dell..
joshSCH
Industrious Poster
4,864 posts since Jul 2005
Reputation Points: 1,315
Solved Threads: 10
>Macbooks suck
You aren't helping anyone with that statement. Give some reasons to back yourself up and maybe I'll respect you a little bit.
>I would try to stick with XP pro, if at all possible.
Is there any reason you give for not recommending XP Home, if all the OP does is surf the net, listen to music, and author DVDs?
>I would personally go with hp, I've used their laptops in the past,
>and I think they are very reliable
From what I've read, HP has a very poor repair history. Dell is typically more reliable in terms of low-midrange laptops.
John A
Vampirical Lurker
7,630 posts since Apr 2006
Reputation Points: 2,240
Solved Threads: 339
I've also heard some poor things about HP-Compaq laptops. My dad and sister each have one, and they've had a couple problems but nothing major. My Toshiba's been fine for the little over two years I've had it, but if you've had problems it's understandable that you'd want something else. Sony has a very good rep, and the Macbooks are pretty popular. If you look at dells, go for some of the pricier ones within your budget. You get what you pay for...
Infarction
Posting Virtuoso
1,580 posts since May 2006
Reputation Points: 683
Solved Threads: 53
>I would try to stick with XP pro, if at all possible.
Is there any reason you give for not recommending XP Home, if all the OP does is surf the net, listen to music, and author DVDs?
XP Pro's EOL is later than that of XP home
jbennet
Moderator
18,523 posts since Apr 2005
Reputation Points: 1,820
Solved Threads: 600
You aren't helping anyone with that statement. Give some reasons to back yourself up and maybe I'll respect you a little bit.
I dislike them for many reasons, but here is not the place to discuss that. I would not recommend buying a macbook unless you want to do a lot of video editing, graphics design, etc.. Especially if you have never used a MAC before b/c then you will have to get use to a new os.Is there any reason you give for not recommending XP Home, if all the OP does is surf the net, listen to music, and author DVDs? XP Pro just has much more it can offer the user especially from a networking standpoint.. It is much easier to adapt to any working environment, and it offers the user more.. However, if the OP simply wants to surf the net, listen to music, etc. there is nothing wrong with XP home.From what I've read, HP has a very poor repair history. Dell is typically more reliable in terms of low-midrange laptops. Really? I have never had any problems with hp.. but I do agree that dell is probably more reliable.
joshSCH
Industrious Poster
4,864 posts since Jul 2005
Reputation Points: 1,315
Solved Threads: 10
>I dislike them for many reasons, but here is not the place to discuss that.
We're not discussing why you don't like them, we're trying to discuss why the OP should/shouldn't buy something. If you don't give any reasons, what makes your statement constructive or helpful? How is anyone supposed to believe you when you refuse to give reasons why not to buy it?
I agree with Infarction about the Sony laptops. They do cost more than Dells, but tend to be more reliable and of higher quality than Dell or HP.
John A
Vampirical Lurker
7,630 posts since Apr 2006
Reputation Points: 2,240
Solved Threads: 339
>Why do you think Macbooks suck
Here is "not the place to discuss it". :icon_rolleyes:
>what is an XP pro? Is that a Mac?
There are different versions of Windows XP. The most common one is XP Home. Windows XP Professional costs more, in return for more features.
>Unfortunately, I can only get whatever Best Buy sells.
Are you allowed to customize the laptop? Because most laptops' hardware can be configured for more RAM, larger hard disks, etc., so you would get your money's worth.
>Do you think it is too difficult to get used when purchasing a Macbook?
It's a new operating system, but I do believe you'll get used to it very quickly. In fact, the less of a power user you are, the easier you'll find an OS switch to be.
>What do you mean by "unless you want to do alot of video editing
>and graphics design etc...
I think what he means is that video editing and graphic design is one of Mac's strengths. But he has yet to state a reason why one shouldn't get a Mac if they aren't doing this.
John A
Vampirical Lurker
7,630 posts since Apr 2006
Reputation Points: 2,240
Solved Threads: 339
>I guess high RAM and and memory are the two things I should shoot for.
RAM is memory. But yes, if you decide to buy a MacBook, you'll probably want more than the default 512 MB that comes with them.
John A
Vampirical Lurker
7,630 posts since Apr 2006
Reputation Points: 2,240
Solved Threads: 339
Stick with what you're used to.. I wouldn't recommend a macbook because you will have to get used to another operating system, and they are not compatible with as much hardware/software as microsoft's os. Again, I suggest you buy Microsoft Windows XP Professional or XP Home. A system with 2 gigabytes of RAM, 150-200 gigabytes of hardrive capacity, a nice amd dual core processor, and wireless ethernet should run you well under $1700. The laptop I am purchasing for college has all those specs, a dvd burner, a finger print scanner, and a 17 inch screen for only $1049.
joshSCH
Industrious Poster
4,864 posts since Jul 2005
Reputation Points: 1,315
Solved Threads: 10
>Stick with what you're used to
Right. So since the original poster is used to Toshibas, he/she should get another one just like it. Or are you saying that hardware doesn't apply in this case?
>I wouldn't recommend a macbook because you will have to get used to another operating system
That's why they suck?
>they are not compatible with as much hardware/software as microsoft's os
But the original poster didn't say that he/she used a lot of hardware/software. :icon_rolleyes:
John A
Vampirical Lurker
7,630 posts since Apr 2006
Reputation Points: 2,240
Solved Threads: 339
>Stick with what you're used to
Right. So since the original poster is used to Toshibas, he/she should get another one just like it. Or are you saying that hardware doesn't apply in this case?
Oh, don't be a smart a$$.. You knew perfectly well that I was only referring to software.. The difference between apple and microsoft OS is a lot larger than the negligible difference between laptop manufacturers..>I wouldn't recommend a macbook because you will have to get used to another operating system
That's why they suck? Did I say that? No...>they are not compatible with as much hardware/software as microsoft's os
But the original poster didn't say that he/she used a lot of hardware/software. :icon_rolleyes: Better safe than sorry.. I don't know about you or the OP, but I would rather ensure that all my software and hardware was supported than go out and buy a machine that does not support the software I intend to use...
joshSCH
Industrious Poster
4,864 posts since Jul 2005
Reputation Points: 1,315
Solved Threads: 10
>You knew perfectly well that I was only referring to software
Should differences in software be what keeps you from switching?
>Did I say that?
You still haven't said why they suck, and when you give two reasons why not to buy them, one is inclined to believe that at least one of these is why you think they're not very good.
>Better safe than sorry
When the original poster states "I basically want to use my lap top to cruise the Internet, download music, upload video to make DVD's and have a decent battery life", it implies that they don't use a lot of hardware or software. And if that is really a concern, a little bit of research will quickly reveal whether or not the hardware/software you own will be compatible with your future Macintosh.
John A
Vampirical Lurker
7,630 posts since Apr 2006
Reputation Points: 2,240
Solved Threads: 339
