The way I see it is that the email address in question is one inputted by the submitter. What if this question is not asked ? So I'm seeing if in the back end PHP file, the email address in question is not anything entered by submitter but simply one with the correct @site.com ending. That way should slip "under the radar" and submitted info would send. It also seems to me the submitter's email address question doesn't have to be removed. That submitted info would still display in the submitted info email's body but would be from "<anything>@site.com". And since its the @site.com part of the email address that allows the submitted info to send (whatever is to the left of the @ is irrelevant), the sender would be the site itself and not the submitter. But the submitter's email address would still display in the body. That way should be able to "have cake and eat it". I'll be running new testing to see what happens...
Dani
4,084
The Queen of DaniWeb
Administrator
Featured Poster
Premium Member
rproffitt
commented:
This isn't a code issue. It's the email server rules. Talk to your provider.
+0
rproffitt
commented:
Weird formatting choice.
+0
rproffitt
commented:
I think you're almost there. What sends the email is your code and as such is the sender so any other domain would be a spoof.
+0
rproffitt
commented:
Since John isn't the sender but your code then all is as it should be today. Anti-spoof measures are working.
+0
rproffitt
commented:
Time to talk to your email provider. This is anti-spoofing not anti-spam. i.e. making emails "appear" to be from other than the true sender.
+0
rproffitt
commented:
Exactly what a good email server should do. Sender should match with domain being sent from.
+0
rproffitt
commented:
That sounds like your host has implemented anti-spam methods. The domain you mention appears to be yours so why should it be other than radiant?
+17
rproffitt
commented:
10 years late?
-4
rproffitt
commented:
Why so late?
-4
Dani
commented:
And ... ?
-8
rproffitt
commented:
From memory that's a valid example. Let's hope arcon engages and supplies a minimum viable example rather "code is broken."
+17
Reverend Jim
4,780
Hi, I'm Jim, one of DaniWeb's moderators.
Moderator
Featured Poster
rproffitt
commented:
You didn't supply the code in the clear. ZIP file? I won't open it and then the problems noted above.
+17