why we can't specify like the following code
synchronized class a
{
--
}
if we want to synchronize a class we need to code like
synchronized(a.class) ?
If any body help me I will be very thankfull to them.
satish.paluvai
-1
Light Poster
Recommended Answers
Jump to PostIMO, a class provides a template for the creation of objects. It doesn't make sense to make a class synchronized. You can always make all the methods of a class synchronized if you want or place synchronized blocks inside methods and .
All 2 Replies
~s.o.s~
2,560
Failure as a human
Team Colleague
Featured Poster
IMO, a class provides a template for the creation of objects. It doesn't make sense to make a class synchronized. You can always make all the methods of a class synchronized if you want or place synchronized blocks inside methods and .
Read this whole thing.
jwenting
1,889
duckman
Team Colleague
only correct answer: because the language specification doesn't allow it.
Why it doesn't allow it you should ask the people who invented the language, but better make sure you have a less silly reason for the question than "it was asked during an interview" because they'll be more likely to enter into a debate about the futility of stupid interview questions than language design decisions.
Be a part of the DaniWeb community
We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.