da penguin

Yes, it does remain. If new operator is used u need to delete explicitly.

i consider this thread lame but funny... p.s. dev c++ must die! p.p.s. seriously, must die already.

read the code-posting-rules first

u don't need them classrooms to learn anything, tis bullshit

Man, u gon pay money to ppl for doin ya homework or what?

[QUOTE]variable would be successfully set to functionCall()'s return value[/QUOTE] no way, variable is set to true, because functionCall()!=0 is true. in this case true means 1

Is this a joke?

Lines 11,12. n is 0 after them and also i don't get why u use for not while and why u need that int i

fstream header will do. just include <ifstream> then do ifstream vname("filename"); vname >> array[i]; as many times as needed

Look, you have that [ICODE]#include<string.h>[/ICODE] right? So why don't you use c++ strings? It's like [CODE=CPP]string str; str = "whatever"[/CODE] and it's easier. Now this [CODE=CPP] for(int b=0;b<=(strlen(a)-1);b++) { for(int c=0;c<=(strlen(a)-2);c++) { if(strcmp(a[c],a[c+1])<0) //I DON"T THINK THIS IS RIGHT { strcpy(temp,a[c]); strcpy(a[c],a[c+1]); strcpy(a[c],temp); } } }[/CODE] is a mess. You …

Guess it would be good to mention that an abstract class is mostly an interface, a common interface for all derevied ones. For example you can make an abstract class with only one pure virtual overloaded operator= and derive from it all "assignable" classes.

new allocates dynamic memory (did i choose the right words?).