It is actually alot harder to find comparisons, than I would have thought. But of course when you do, it's hard to peel back the bias. I would have thought that this is a Hardware comparison issue, and price, from you own point of view. I don't know enough about Macs to give great advise, but your concerns seem more based around hardware capabilities, than OS vs OS.
It seems to me also, that you would prefer to get an Apple, simply from what you have said, and I can't think that either OS would fail to be capable of your needs.
Personally, I would ensure that you have a suitable minimun spec. Most new systems have a capable CPU, but you should ensure you at least have 512mb ram, but I would advise an upgrade to 1Gb. I would ensure you have a branded Graphics Card, ATI, VNidia. Better support, better quality. Avoid anything built in. Finally a decent screen. I would want at least a 15, if not 17inch screen, capable of at least a 1280x1024 (or widescreen equivalent). Hard drives not so important, as expensive to upgrade in a laptop, and external drives are great value these days.
Still it all comes down to finance. good luck
MartyMcFly
Practically a Master Poster
678 posts since Feb 2005
Reputation Points: 16
Solved Threads: 17
If you can use both, then choose which ever you like. But, if you decide to get a PC, don't get a Dell. I know you said you don't like them, but I was just reassuring you ;) Alienware would be my choice of a manufactured computer. Apple or PC.... It's a toss up. Both are excellent.
server_crash
Postaholic
2,111 posts since Jun 2004
Reputation Points: 113
Solved Threads: 20
What you get depends on what you want to do with it now and in the future.
I've pondered getting a Mac on the side myself for image processing and just to have one ;) but thought why bother.
PC works well enough for that for my purposes and I need it for other things as well (development work, testing, and I'm active in the MS Flightsim community) and have a big investment in Windows software already.
I'm actually more likely to get a SparcStation (Sun Solaris) now than a Mac, and use that specifically for Java development.
But first a new PC at some point, maybe spend my vacation money this year on a new nice Alienware ;)
jwenting
duckman
8,392 posts since Nov 2004
Reputation Points: 1,662
Solved Threads: 337
That's a tough question. I like the Apple 17inch, and have looked on the Apple site a while ago, and loved some of the Apple Features, particularly in multimedia, (was thinking about a Mac Mini). But I also commented on someone else looking at a R15 Tablet, or Viao FJ series model. I think the benefit of a Tablet PC would be good if you like to work away from a desk environment. The fact that you can fold away the keyboard, makes it easy to rest on your lap. I could picture myself maybe video editing, or a spot of photo manipulation, quite comfortably on a sofa, and this would be a big plus in my opinion.
Personally, I think of Apple a bit like Sony. Their products are good on their own, but combining them, really improves functionality, and both companies are very focused on these ideas. If you may expand to other Apple products in the future, this might tip a decision.
As for both, sounds nice, but necessity ???
MartyMcFly
Practically a Master Poster
678 posts since Feb 2005
Reputation Points: 16
Solved Threads: 17
Have you ever played around with a tablet pc? I used one once and didn't really like it too much. I think it was a toshiba. Nothing wrong with the computer as for as quality goes(at least I think!), but I just didn't find the tablet part as useful as I thought. You can write fast, but not as fast as you would like and it has a lot of trouble converting to pc text.....That is, if you write as messy as me.
Oh well, it's up to you. I'd take an alienware over it ;)
server_crash
Postaholic
2,111 posts since Jun 2004
Reputation Points: 113
Solved Threads: 20
and he highly suggested Apple and gave very good reasons why.
What were his reasons?
server_crash
Postaholic
2,111 posts since Jun 2004
Reputation Points: 113
Solved Threads: 20
probably the typical "it's not Windows so it must be good" ;)
jwenting
duckman
8,392 posts since Nov 2004
Reputation Points: 1,662
Solved Threads: 337
He's also going to hook me up with Microsoft Office 2004 because he has it. I'm guessing it's a corporate license he has not sure.
I would personally avoid a coporate license, as I believe they are only for use with equipment owned by the company. Anyway I would check it out, especially when Open Office 2.0 is available for Mac, and little different from MS's offering.
As for a tablet, I've never extensively used one. Although I've use PDA's, and agree with your comments on the recognition software. I thought though, that with Video and Photo work, as with multimedia use, you don't need the keyboard anyway. Does Windows Table Edition come in XP Pro flavour, or XP Home, or both?
ratm456, Sounds like you got a good deal on the laptop, enjoy!
MartyMcFly
Practically a Master Poster
678 posts since Feb 2005
Reputation Points: 16
Solved Threads: 17
Corporate licensing schemes depend largely on the company.
We have one where people are allowed to use certain programs at home on a company license.
Previous company we could get pretty much anything on the MSDN, being an MSP made that possible (though I've a feeling now that they may have been a bit more free in handing out licenses than was really allowed).
jwenting
duckman
8,392 posts since Nov 2004
Reputation Points: 1,662
Solved Threads: 337
Hello Dave,
Good Choice! You will be able to get OpenOffice to work on the Mac under OS X, but it will look a bit different than your typical Mac application, and it will require the installation of the Darwin tools in order to function.
I have decided to hold off on my next powerbook purchase until after they go with Intel hardware. I have waited this long to get a new PowerBook, and a couple more months (or sooner) will not harm me.
Christian
kc0arf
Posting Virtuoso
1,937 posts since Mar 2004
Reputation Points: 121
Solved Threads: 57
