Member Avatar for riahc3

We plan to record/read data as fast as 10 ms (that's milliseconds) to a database. Now, this database will be in a factory so there is gonna be a lot of vibrations, temps, etc...

Logically the first choice to everyone is a SSD. The problem with the SSD is that writing/reading information THAT fast will completely destroy the SSD in no time. So that's why it better to go with a traditional one.

Ive rethought about it and I want to confirm this as being true: Writing/reading 10ms data to a database stored on a SSD would kill it in no time, right?

  • 3 Contributors
  • 3 Replies
  • 262 Views
  • 3 Days Discussion Span
  • Latest Post Latest Post by riahc3

Recommended Answers

All 3 Replies

Member Avatar for Reverend Jim

Why does the DB server have to be on the factory floor where all the vibration is occurring? And if it is a requirement for some reason, there are ways of isolating the server by placing it on a base that will dampen the vibrations.

Edited by Reverend Jim
Member Avatar for riahc3

Why does the DB server have to be on the factory floor where all the vibration is occurring? And if it is a requirement for some reason, there are ways of isolating the server by placing it on a base that will dampen the vibrations.

It has to be to comply to certain standards. And yes, if we go mechanical, there are ways to dampen the vibration like you mentioned.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.