and in general std::list(http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/stl/list/) is a good idea
I think you should do this:
CPP Node* List::at(int index) { Node *temp = head; int i; for(i = 0; i < index; ++i) { temp = temp->next; } return temp; }
H Node* at(int index);
Can you post your code? <<snip>>
#include <string>
will help :)
i would use: - std::queue - instead of char sender[20],recipient[20],content[100],date[10]; -> std::string - strcpy would obsolte with std:.string - instead of:
void receiveMessage(Que q) { Message m=q.remove(); if(strcmp(m.sender," ")!=0) { cout<<"\nDate: "<<m.getDate(); cout<<"\nFrom: "<<m.sender; cout<<"\nTo: "<<m.recipient; cout<<"\nContent:"<<m.content; } else cout<<"\nNo messages to receive."; }
void receiveMessage(Que q) { Message m=q.remove(); if(strcmp(m.sender," ")!=0) { cout<<"\nDate: "<<m.getDate(); cout<<"\nFrom: "<<m.sender; cout<<"\nTo: "<<m.recipient; cout<<"\nContent:"<<m.content; } else throw CNoMessageReceived("No messages to receive."); }
or
eError receiveMessage(Que q) { Message m=q.remove(); if(strcmp(m.sender," ")!=0) { cout<<"\nDate: "<<m.getDate(); cout<<"\nFrom: "<<m.sender; cout<<"\nTo: "<<m.recipient; cout<<"\nContent:"<<m.content; } else return ERR_NO_MSG_RCV; }
- use & Reference
eError receiveMessage(Que q)
BETTER:
eError receiveMessage(Que &q)
- cout in class is always bad design, except your class method called "PrintDebugXYZ"
enough for today :)
"A?%%CNT1%%" should help
Look into http://docs.python.org/library/smtplib.html ;)
