Tcll 66 Posting Whiz in Training Featured Poster

apparently this seems to be pretty unheard of because of the over-glorified NumPy extension, which yes is faster than using python alone,
but most likely not as fast as defining the raw complex methods such as matrix inversion in plain C.

with NumPy you need to make an array object before you can do any sorts of calculations on it.
the fact that this is a general object for any particular use, I would assume makes the actual backend process slower.

so I'm looking for a C extension that can do basically exactly what pyrr does, but w/o the use of NumPy.
anyone know of anything??