Timestamp | Post | Voter | Comment | Reputation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Re: Quick Questiong Regarding returning an Address | mrnutty | Always get there before others, huh? | +4 | |
Recursive translation of numbers to words | tux4life | Incredibly nice! | +21 | |
Re: Enquiries on printf function | tux4life | Great post, keep up the good work Tommy ! :) | +21 | |
Re: Enquiries on printf function | kvprajapati | I appreciate your knowledge. | +13 | |
Re: Why isnt cin.get() working here | Salem | Many fine points | +36 | |
Re: C language help claer all the doubts if possible | Nick Evan | - that's another bookmark | +27 | |
Re: C language help claer all the doubts if possible | jephthah | bork bork bork :) | +15 | |
Re: Convert vector<string> to vector<double> | mrnutty | Good job | +2 | |
Re: Convert vector<string> to vector<double> | Dave Sinkula | This will be a good post to refer to in the future (but I've come to expect that). | +26 | |
Re: how to print the address stored by char * | Salem | Nice, so few people get the %p thing right. Though the C++ would have been better with a reinterpret_cast | +36 | |
Re: c++ standard deviaton | nav33n | Agree! | +11 | |
Re: C language help claer all the doubts if possible | tux4life | Some other interesting stuff about C :P | +20 | |
Re: How can I sort my address book in alphabetical order??? | Salem | Nice | +36 | |
Re: Call-By-Value versus Call-By-Refference | tux4life | I appreciate you for taking the time to answer this question in a more correct way than I did :P | +20 | |
Re: Command line arguments | iamthwee | Good explanation and carefully thought out. | +22 | |
Re: Command line arguments | MentallyIll5150 | Thanks! | +1 | |
Re: Return 0; and system ("pause") | Salem | Wise words indeed, there is no safety netting. | +36 | |
Re: Array of names | Nick Evan | seconded | +24 | |
Re: Array of names | yellowSnow | An excellent and informative reply. | +4 | |
Re: How to ignore cin? | tux4life | Perfect! | +19 | |
Re: c++ standard deviaton | Salem | Works for me, the OP has already lost anyway. | +36 | |
Re: c++ standard deviaton | iamthwee | Doesn't really help the OP considering his level. | -4 | |
Re: Unusual c code | tux4life | Clean, sweet, and solid! | +18 | |
Re: cout padding and text alignment | necrolin | Agreed | +1 | |
Re: Spam threads... "Soft deletions" versions complete deletion | lllllIllIlllI | Hahah nice. i was going to say that. but a lot less nice. I get sick of constant b**tching :P | +4 | |
Re: String to unsigned char array | tux4life | The better example is in place here :) | +18 | |
Re: call matching constructor | sknake | Thats what I would do | +6 | |
Re: VC++ and .NET Framework general question | Creator07 | Thanks buddy | +1 | |
Re: Extern Functions: | jephthah | attack thwarted | +14 | |
Re: not recently used replacement | tux4life | I don't know how you keep doing it, but your replies are always excellent :) | +17 |
The End.