I am working with a MDI in my program. I use .cpp
to compile although I program primarily with api's.
I'm not sure whether that places me in C++ or
Windows threads. Since using .cpp I have to obey C++
rules so I'll list my thread in the C++ area. Feel
free to move my thread if you are so inclined.

I normally compile with a Borland BCC32 compiler. So
much for background.

My problem was a stupid move on my part. When
creating my MDI Client Window I came across either
a style setting or something similar that allowed me to
change the size of the Client Window.

Without that WM_,SWP_,CS_, or other, the Client Window
cannot be sized by moving the edge like the child
windows can. I deleted off that particular item assuming
I could just find it and pop it back on if I needed it.
WRONG! I can't find it anywhere. If I hadn't personally
used it, I would swear it doesn't exist.

It had to be somewhere in WIN32.HLP but I'll be dog gone
if I can find it. I did a web search but most articles
are in vb or MFC and were no help.

Can anyone tell me the the correct item I'm looking for?
I would have sworn it was SWP_RESIZABLE but I've had no
luck finding that.

If one of you guys are proficient in MDI, e-mail me the
correct spelling to toolmanx@ij.net or stick the answser
in this thread or both.

If I understand you correctly, you need to look in your documentation at SetWindowPos() for the SWP_FOO flags.

Hope this helps.

I looked in SWP and all the WM's and other places I could think of. Like I said, if I had not
used it in the program I am working on and seen it work, I would think there is no such thing. This is why I am so ticked at myself. I assumed I could easily get it if I needed it. You know what assuming does.

For anyone following this thread, I am giving up. I have read through loads of .h's and
other help files to no avail. I worked around using my "found and then lost" style symbol by using SetWindowPos to adjust the MDI window to the desired size. Maybe some day I'll find it again.

This question has already been answered. Start a new discussion instead.