Guidelines to assist multiple content developers?

Good start @Loved — and good catch by @CaffeineCoder about following standards. Since you already have the basics underway, make the authors' page a practical toolkit: ownership, repeatable templates, clear workflow, measurable checks, and quick test methods authors can use before they publish.

• Ownership and review cadence: one owner per page, a visible "last reviewed" date, and a simple escalation path for stale content.
• Page templates and field definitions: provide ready-made templates for program, news, event, and service pages with required vs optional fields.
• Style and microcopy rules: headings hierarchy, voice and tone rules, allowed abbreviations, date/time formats and example phrasing.
• Accessibility checks authors can run: contrast targets, keyboard tab order, captions/transcripts for media, and semantic heading structure.
• Mobile expectations: priority content for small screens, headline length guidance, and examples of collapsed content patterns.
• Multimedia and asset rules: preferred formats, max sizes, thumbnail rules, and where to host large files.
• Structured data and discovery: require basic JSON-LD for key page types and document sitemap update responsibility.
• Analytics and KPIs: who adds tracking, naming conventions for events, and what success looks like for each page type.
• Publishing permissions and rollback plan: staging, peer review, accessibility signoff, publish, monitor, and an undo plan.
• Quick QA checklist for authors: contact accuracy, external resources, image rendering, readability, and a mobile check.

Simple workflow to publish: 1) create draft from the right template; 2) run the automated checks (accessibility, performance, resource checker), then peer and compliance review; 3) push to staging, smoke-test, publish, and set a review reminder.

For tooling and examples, include links to guidance such as Lighthouse, schema.org, and axe by Deque so contributors can run quick validations.