Posts by christina>you

do you like the rep system now?

Football.

Mac and cheese or mashed potatoes?

grown

you get to go on a ride.

I put in a birthday cake.

an intelligent whip.

Pain in the butt. =p

282

It wasn't solved when I posted. And you seemed to be getting whiny about your games... It just got tiresome. Over and done with. Friends again? (even if you did give me a red mark :icon_confused:)

Yes, we can be friends. And sorry, it was just offensive to me.

Very well thought out. A theory is a fact. As much as the fact that I have five fingers or something.

Oh my gosh, we have gone over this in the first 20 pages. THEORY does not = FACT. Go back and read.

tread

Christina -- stop it!

No one is saying we should completely get rid of games. Just move them out of the Geek Lounge to a Game Lounge. That way us geeks can continue our geeky discussions because that's where we go for it! Telling us to not visit so you can play games is not productive, especially when a solution that works has been offered.

And here is where Dani gets her info on what we like and dislike, not from PMs. You think she wants a lot of whiney geeks PMing her? Not on your life!

As for "There are word games, yes, but there are also other intellectual discussions dealing with politics and religion", look at the facts:
Of the 25 posts on the first page, 13 are games. That's over 50%. And as far as I can tell, 3 discussions. Not very good odds. Used to be 3 games.

Wow. =/ No need to get offensive here.
Everything has been solved, so be happy.

love -> marriage

And they will

bears

Walk Away - Paula DeAnda

write -> letters

jeans

means, are you

great

answer -> reply

Josh, it's sad to see you gone.
I kinda liked debating with ya. =/
I'm not exactly clear on what happened, but I hope the best for you.

what? -> question

tear

no, I can't do that! =p

do you shop a lot?

you get to burn dvds illegally. =p

i put in some chewing gum.

276

Again, I say to you rejoice!

Bravo sk8ndestroy.
You make very good points.

274

The thing is, people are going to believe what they want. I don't think this is ever going to change on this thread. I've tried over and over to convey my beliefs, and I don't think it has had any affect on anyone.

I love debating and standing up for my faith, but it wouldn't bother me too bad if the thread closed. I mean, it is a good thread though. I believe everyone has made very valid posts, for the exception of the name-calling earlier on in this thread.

5.0??
4.0 is the highest here.

I do not believe in faith. So basically you are saying that you believe in god because it makes you feel good and makes you have a sense of purpose? And that if it makes you feel better then its ok to believe it?

I've gone through this about a hundred times with Josh. So I suggest you just go back to the last 82 pages.

But again, I do not just worship God because it 'makes me feel good,' I do it because He deserves it. He is worthy of all my praise and glory.

And of course you believe in some kind of faith.
If you study for a test, you have 'faith' that you will make a good grade.
If you go to sleep, you have 'faith' that you will wake up the next morning.

Faith is just another word for assurance and confidence. So you cannot say you don't believe in it. =/

270

Why does there have to be absolute proof for everything you believe?
There is such a thing called faith.

Yes, I agree with Infarction.

You seem to be very closed-minded, Sturm.

268...
this is weird since the post number is #436

yeah

You took a mercedes benz to prom?? What the... ? =o

you get an F.

I put in a million dollars.

human beings, instead

Walk The Line - Johnny Cash

I have a 4.0 GPA.

No.

do you have a talent?

Lake.

amusement park or water park?

linear

words -> language

Jack Sparrow is my favorite character in the Pirates of the Caribbean.

Okay? Then prove this to be false...

The major point which has helped convince me that the moon landing was faked was the fact that when the control room asked a question to the astronauts, the replies were instant with no delays. This seems strange as even with technology in the 1990's there is a delay from satellite links from the UK to the US. There is about a 0.7 second delay from London to California so how is it possible for instant replies from the Moon ?
There is also evidence that when people go into space that their voice goes tense although the astronauts voices have been analyzed and found to be normal, and 7/10 people said it sounded like someone reading from a script.

When Houston is talking to the module you should not be able to hear the responses at least when the module is landing and the infamous "eagle has landed" quote, this is due to the noise that should have been created by the rocket motor which generates several hundred thousand pounds of thrust 20 ft below the astronauts. The noise would have completely drowned
the vocals out.

Stop categorizing people. Its the sickest thing one can do. And whats the big deal about IQ. In real life it doesn't prove anything. All the great people who were born were not measured by their IQ but their deeds.

I concur.

I think it was supposedly set in the Nevada Desert.

There were several motives that suggested for the U.S. government to fake the moon landing. I know of two that are pretty popular motives...

1. Distraction - The U.S. government benefited from a popular distraction to take attention away from the Vietnam war. Lunar activities did abruptly stop, with planned missions canceled, around the same time that the US ceased its involvement in the Vietnam War.
2. The U.S. government considered it vital that the U.S. win the space race with the USSR. Going to the Moon, if it was possible, would have been risky and expensive. It would have been much easier to fake the landing, thereby ensuring success.

And one question I've always wanted to know, How could the flag flutter when there's no wind on the moon?