No one has voted on any posts yet. Votes from other community members are used to determine a member's reputation amongst their peers.
6 Posted Topics
Re: rOckbaer, Semantically, you are incorrect, even though in most cases that would work. What you stated will exit the Application Loop that that Application represents. For multiple Application Loops, the must all be terminated. | |
Re: Late, I know, but -- Kate is correct. In the case that you want to return two variables of different types, you can simply return an array of object, or a Class created to contain those different types. Lets look at a couple of different ways to accomplish this: [CODE] … | |
Re: A good place to start since it seems you aren't running you encryption routine on a separate thread, would be to add: [code] Application.DoEvents(); [/code] You would add that into your encryption loop. That will cause windows to process any messages waiting in the message queue. You are using enough … ![]() | |
Re: SPYRO is right. Any time that you are processing in a loop to build a string, or as some of you have stated, manipulating a large string, StringBuilder is the way. The overhead of StringBuilder is nothing when compared to the overhead created by a loop that run through 1000 … | |
Re: VS.NET IDE is very intuitive. There are some glitches but with as robust as it is, MS would have been hard pressed not to screw up somewhere. There is no IDE as comprehensive. You COULD use #develop for learning purposes, but as stated above, not for anything on a schedule. … | |
Re: .NET has a nice set of File/Directory manipulation classes built right in. Check out the System.IO namespace. Seth Webster |
The End.