Windows in decline?

GuyClapperton 0 Tallied Votes 288 Views Share

Steve Jobs of Apple has declared that Microsoft Windows is in terminal decline. No really, that's what he's said at the All Things Digital conference in LA. And he's had backing from people like Dreamworks, who now access the Internet through an iPad.

OK, we'll take it as read that we understand there's a lot of vested interest going on here. Jobs would love to see Windows crash and burn, and he's likely to be having a load of fun watching as iPad sells 2m units.

But...Windows in decline? Really? To find out whether that's actually going to happen we need to look beyond the headline grandstanding. Here's a link to Wikipedia and some data on who's using which operating system. You'll notice straight away that Apple has 5.8% of the desktop market compared to Microsoft's 90+%.

Now, before we all start giggling, this is actually quite a result for Apple. Microsoft's figure is divided among many different hardware sellers. Apple's is a single company with a massive chunk of the market. It's doing unbelievably well.

But it's still a minority. For Jobs' claim to be correct, people will have to abandon surfing the Internet from their desktops wholesale. 90% isn't going to go anywhere fast - and the initial flurry over the iPad is bound to die down sometime.

I can see Apple continuing to do well and profitably for a long time. Windows declining terminally is another issue entirely, though: I can't see that happening for at least a generation.

Dani AI

Generated

This thread is a useful snapshot of 2010 thinking. The right way to read “Windows in decline” is to ask which layer of computing is meant. On traditional desktops Windows still leads (roughly 70–72% of desktop OS usage worldwide in mid‑2025), but once phones and tablets are counted the picture looks very different because Android and iOS dominate those segments. (gs.statcounter.com)

What actually changed after 2010 was the shape of computing: mobile, cloud and web services grew fast, and Unix/Linux became the default for servers and high‑end compute. Most public web hosts and the top supercomputers now run Unix/Linux stacks, so “decline” is true in server and mobile layers even while Windows retained client‑side strength. (w3techs.com)

Practical takeaway for organisations (as ’s post illustrates): migration to GNU/Linux can work, but it’s an operational project, not a flip of a switch. A concise checklist:

  • Inventory applications and drivers; identify Windows‑only dependencies.
  • Run small pilots and keep a Windows virtualized fallback for legacy apps.
  • Secure vendor or commercial support (RHEL, Ubuntu Pro, managed services) before broad rollout.
  • Train helpdesk and users; plan phased rollouts and clear rollback steps.
  • Track total cost of ownership and political/management risk (Munich’s LiMux experience shows technical success doesn’t remove governance risks).

See practical migration guides and vendor playbooks for each bullet; recent end‑of‑life timelines (Windows 10’s mainstream support ended in October 2025) have also pushed many organisations to evaluate options. (techtarget.com)

Bottom line: was right to be cautious about calling Windows’ demise. The platform ceded ground in mobile and some consumer areas, but it did not evaporate — it adapted and stayed central where legacy apps and enterprise standards matter. Decisions today should be driven by workload compatibility, TCO and user disruption, not by headlines. (statista.com)

pogson 4 Light Poster

A generation in hardware time is three years for some. The only life M$ is having is in business LAN servers because their OS is so messed up they need to sell more products to manage it and in consumer big box stores that sell only M$'s OS to uninformed consumers. Businesses can migrate XP to GNU/Linux more easily than they can migrate XP to "7". More than 50% of PCs run XP at the moment.

Where I work, we are doing XP to GNU/Linux. It works for us. We had constant slow-downs and malware problems (including the damned scanners) before switching to GNU/Linux. We have had no problems with any GNU/Linux box in months except a trivial misconfiguration that was my fault. Users like GNU/Linux because it is faster than XP on the same hardware. We got a few new machines this year and 80% of them went to GNU/Linux. One user had some legacy apps and another user just did not want to change OS but everyone else enjoys the new system. We use the new machines as GNU/Linux terminal servers so even our old machines give the performance of a new machine. There is no comparison between the performance we have now compared to last year. GNU/Linux works for us. All our servers run GNU/Linux.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.