0

The latest Symantec MessageLabs Intelligence Report has landed on my desk and makes for the usual rather depressing reading. I guess that most depressing of all, if not surprising when you take a look at your inbox or worse still your junk folder, are the figures relating to spam activity during May 2009.

It would appear that spam has managed to hit a new low by reaching a new high, and what a high: up 5.4 percent on the previous month to peak at representing some 90.4 percent of all email by volume. That really does suck elephants through a straw backwards, only 1 in every 10 emails not being some unwanted junk mailing. Sigh.

What is odd, however, is the fact that the report reveals the majority of the May increase comprised of messages with hardly any content at all beyond a subject line and a valid URL in the body. Saves having to have it translated into English I suppose. Perhaps not so odd the fact that every URL pointed towards a different, yet active, social networking profile which would appear to have been created using automated CAPTCHA-cracking tools.

“As spam levels continue to increase, we are seeing existing attack techniques combine and morph into one” said Paul Wood, MessageLabs Intelligence Senior Analyst, Symantec. “In 2008 CAPTCHA-breaking, social networking spam and the use of webmail for spamming all became popular tactics. Today, the bad guys are using the three together as a triple threat to heighten the effectiveness of their spamming.”

MessageLabs has also looked into when spam is received, and this would appear to vary depending where in the world you happen to be. US residents see their spam peaking between 9 and 10 in the morning, for example, whereas Europeans are much more likely to get an unrelenting stream of spam throughout the working day. Residents of Asia-Pacific countries start with lots of spam, but it fades off as the day progresses.

“These patterns suggest that spammers are more active during the US working day,” Wood said. “This could be because most active spammers are based in the US, according to data from Spamhaus, or because this is when the spammers’ largest target audience is online and likely to respond.”

As Editorial Director and Managing Analyst with IT Security Thing I am putting more than two decades of consulting experience into providing opinionated insight regarding the security threat landscape for IT security professionals. As an Editorial Fellow with Dennis Publishing, I bring more than two decades of writing experience across the technology industry into publications such as Alphr, IT Pro and (in good old fashioned print) PC Pro. I also write for SC Magazine UK and Infosecurity, as well as The Times and Sunday Times newspapers. Along the way I have been honoured with a Technology Journalist of the Year award, and three Information Security Journalist of the Year awards. Most humbling, though, was the Enigma Award for 'lifetime contribution to IT security journalism' bestowed on me in 2011.

4
Contributors
3
Replies
4
Views
8 Years
Discussion Span
Last Post by deathlemon
0

thank you master A very good article and I will follow the forum constantly. thanks

0

Actually my spam inbox is down from seeing hundreds to seeing maybe a dozen. Don't know what happened to change that number recently.

Have something to contribute to this discussion? Please be thoughtful, detailed and courteous, and be sure to adhere to our posting rules.