Posts by christina>you

?

I have no clue.

spain -> europe

eh, I wouldn't want to live with the guilt.

daytime.

subway or bus?

Well, that's according to Christianity.

364

yes, dogs. :)

do you have a hobby?

be killed. =(

fast food or home cooked dinner?

362

I think jesus having a wife would have been cool. The child could have been half man half holy, a new prophet

It would have created controversy. Everyone knew that Jesus' sole purpose was to sacrifice His life for the sins of the world. It wouldn't have been right if He had a wife.

britian did the same in World War 1. We used out large navy to block german ports and starve the german people to death.

Were we not talking about WWI?

actually, you agree with someone, i said the same thing ;)

Oh, I must have not seen your post. (I just skimmed over the last page.)

359

Personally I don't think the son og God married to an earthly woman would look any worse than an earthly virgin impregnated by the Holy Spirit. I guess if what you said about Isaiah is true, then the idea does contradict christianity. Again even though I don't believe it I heard something about his tomb. I don't know how true it is because someone just told me at school so take it for what it's worth. I was told that in Jesus' recently discovered tomb the bones of what was believed to be Mary Magdalene were found based on Greek writing. I really don't know how true that is, but I want to see what everyone thinks about it. Or change parts of that story that aren't true or need filling in the holes.

No one has found Jesus' tomb. That is just very unlikely and people have been claiming it for centuries. But there hasn't been any evidence supporting that because it is just very improbable. He was buried in a borrowed tomb, and in Christianity, rose 3 days later. The thing you have to look at is the fact that many mothers began naming their baby boys Jesus. It became very popular after His death. So although the name may say 'Jesus,' it is not Jesus Christ.

love <3

death or torture?

I disagree with everyone.
I like the colors, it adds taste to the site! ;)

[...and it also makes the forums easier to differentiate]

Clear sky, so beautiful!

Love or money?

That is the nicest thing anyone has ever done for me.
(cliche) =p

chills

True. There were a lot of mistakes made in history. That's why I think it's important to learn about it, so we don't repeat the past.

But even though I don't believe the ideas of the Da Vinci Code at all, why would it be against religion? I don't think it would be wrong if Jesus had a wife. ....But having a wife and a child cannot be sinful, so I don't see why it would be so bad if Jesus had such a thing.

Actually it would be against the Bible. If Jesus had a wife, it would contradict all the prophesies proclaimed about Him. Isaiah had wrote that the Messiah would have no appearance that we should want Him. And even if Jesus had a wife, how would that look? The son of God is married to an earthly woman? Even though it is not necessarily a sin, Jesus' primary purpose was to seek and save the lost.

I learned that the Germans sinking the ships, were in clear violation of international rules.

well, after Israel's sun it should be refreshing, I don't like the heat much.

I would love to visit Israel. :)

2. don't want to be a statistic

Statistic or stereotype?

Actually, its a well known fact that the lusitania was smuggling weapons

But still, the Germans were at fault because they purposely sank the ship without warning.

bills

I think you should just teach your child right values and instead of filtering content (she would probably find away to get around them anyway), just make sure she's on the right track and doing good in school.

Agreed, but honestly, I don't think you're going to have any trouble with your daughter yet, since she is only seven.

hitler was good in a way ~ no seriously!
He built motorways, made the economy better, and co-invented the VW Beetle!

Really? I always thought of Hitler as a mad man who invented genocide. =p

Welcome to Daniweb Pete! ;)

[tex]100 / 5 = 20[/tex]

it has been slow to reply lately - mainly on posst where there are simulataneous posts

Yes, it is.

christmas -> holiday

anything you try

whole system of

fill

Everything Will Be - Relient K

Project number 1 is harder than you think.

If Hitler were a communist he would have allied with Stalin, not betray him. Hitler and Stalin were polar opposites. The were much hated enemies.

Exactly.

Comedy.

Sun or rain?

you get a "what is that?" from me. ;)

I put in a glass of green tea.

I'm not so sure that Hitler was 'Anti-Communist' as that he was 'Pro-Hitler'. I vaguely recall (will attempt to find specific sources) reading that Hitler's agents were the ones that got the German Communist Party 'riled up' (that is, encouraged them to take action) in the first place. Hitler then stepped in and used their actions, and his own retaliation, as a springboard to further power/authority. Again, I'll try to track down and post the source on this.

Hitler was definitely anti-communist, as I've said before. He was a fascist who believed in aggressive nationalism. Fascism strongly opposes communism. He became a fascist because of his admiration of Mussolini who also opposed communism greatly.

feet

are you allergic to something?

food -> turkey

manga -> mango

japan -> asia

heat

357

workers and socialism = communism

Hitler was anti-communist. The word 'workers' in the name served no purpose.

It was explained to me once but I can't remember why. I do know that the name seems contradictory to its purpose. But there's no doubt about it, Hitler was most certainly not a socialist. I'll see if I can find the piece of literature that explains the name of the Nazi party.

Yes, I know what you are talking about.

bugs bunny -> cartoons

Then why was the political unit (party? movement?) Hitler lead known as the "National Socialists"?

Actually it was called the National Socialist German Workers' Party later known as the Nazi Party.