>>I'm currently using the new borland so this is a correct syntax after all it's
>>working on my computer, as for the variables i am on writing description for
>>everyone of them.
This is a wakeup bell for all those who are using Old compilers ( like the OP is using Borland's) that C++ has been standardized 13years ago. So there is no concept as "It is working on my implementation so it ought to be right".
This is what cooks me up boiling. Ruthless.
To the OP, Please Read :http://cppdb.blogspot.com/2008/10/why-you-shouldnt-use-you-use-old-c.html
and http://cppdb.blogspot.com/2009/02/should-i-use-void-main-or-int-main-or.html
These are some link is from Bjarne Stroustup's homepage:
* A Very simple ISO standard program http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq2.html#simple-program
* About void main http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq2.html#void-main
and
* This ones about naming variables http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq2.html#Hungarian
(I am really surprised by the guts of OP. A good man (Mosiac) is giving him advice and he is just too much a snob to accept it)