Al Quaeda Hit List and Bomb Tips Allegedly Linked to Shut Down of Blogetery

Updated Niki_Fears 0 Tallied Votes 439 Views Share

Blogetery.com, a free WordPress blog provider, was shut down earlier this month when their entire server was mysteriously yanked without warning or explanation. When the site went dark, over 73,000 user generated blogs disappeared and since then there has been little to no information as who was responsible for pulling the plug or why. Now, after the story has begun to catch media attention and speculation has been running high, Blogetery's hosting provider, BurstNet, has issued an official statement alleging that terrorist activity is associated with the shut down; something many people have speculated on throughout the blogosphere over the past few days.

In the statement, BurstNet claims that they were contacted, via a letter from a still unnamed law enforcement agency that “revealed a link to terrorist material, including bomb-making instructions and an al-Qaeda “hit list"”. They further cited that they found that this also violated their terms of service and that there had been a history of “abuse” by Blogetery. Other reports are stating that the letter was from the FBI; however, this was not clearly stated in BurstNet's statement at this time.

There seems to be some contradictions from communiques posted by Blogetery admins in which BurstNet alludes to the fact that the decision to yank the servers themselves were forced upon BurstNet and these same unnamed law enforcement agencies had forbidden them from giving any information as to what had happened or why; however, now they seem to be saying that BurstNet chose to pull the plug after they received the letter requesting information. So again, we seem to be left with even more questions and even fewer answers.

The BurstNet statement was brief and was more a PR push boasting about the “growth” of their company than offering any real information; however they did say that “law enforcement” personnel requested information to identify the posters of the content in question which, if that is the case, seems to be a simple enough of a request- so why the need for the cloak and dagger show? Why not be forth coming with the Admins of Blogetery about the issue or simply state that a terms of service violation occurred in relations to the posts in question? That would have ended the entire issue easily enough, but instead the blogosphere is still abuzz about this incident and its future implications.

Further adding to the speculation and mystery of this entire event is in which they present an email statement from an FBI spokesman, Paul Bresson, stating that they had made no request for a site to be shut down. Apparently BurstNet has been unavailable for further comments and according to the same report, their answering machines have been unplugged and officials are currently unreachable. At this point it is hard to tell who is trying to save face and who is actually pulling the strings in this case.

While reports from ,including CNet , are stating that terrorist material and links to an Al Queda recruiting magazine, Inspire, were found on the servers, this issue raises several questions about the rights and safety of internet users and their content and concerns about how law enforcement handles such cases.

One glaring question that is yet to be answered is that if it was in fact believed that these posts contained lists of Americans who were targeted for assassination as it has been alleged, then why would the FBI send, not an agent, not a team of agents, but merely a letter to request information? And why would the request prompt a complete and total shut down of thousands of other blogs? It is laziness on the part of the FBI? Overkill on the part of BurstNet? Or is there still more to this story?

While it appears that the sites were not “officially” shut down by the government but was instead a “voluntary” action prompted by an investigation, could we be seeing the beginnings of what is the equivalent of a Virtual Martial Law? After the recent to essentially shut down the internet at will, moves such as this raise questions that propose a constitutional and economic nightmare. The freedom of information could be an issue if all that is needed to pull a plug on thousands of users is the mere mention of the word “terrorism”. This could be a simple issue of law enforcement using scare tactics to “encourage” the host to “voluntarily” shut down the server, or it could be a business hiding behind the legal issue to recover their image; either way, with technology and communication now so intimately intertwined into every aspect of our lives from our financial well being to religious expression, there may be a lot more at stake here than just one blogging site. It is, indeed, a brave new world.

There is still no word yet as to whether the vanishing of the free forum provider IPBFree.com that occurred shortly after Blogetery went dark, is related at all to this incident or not, but we will continue to monitor the story for further updates.

Dani AI

Generated

This note pulls together practical, verifiable steps and clarifications prompted by ’s summary and ’s claim about alleged extremist material. The situation combines two separate problems: an emergency takedown triggered by claims of illegal content, and the parallel problem of thousands of end users losing hosted content with little transparency. Both raise operational, evidence‑preservation, and legal‑process questions that are often glossed over in news summaries.

Recommended immediate actions for affected accounts:

  • Record timeline details (first outage, any emails or automated notices, error pages). Preserve screenshots and raw email headers.
  • Send a written preservation request to the hosting company and registrar asking them to retain backups, logs and account metadata. Keep copies of sent messages and delivery receipts.
  • Check local sources for copies: exported posts, RSS or feed aggregators, email notifications, browser caches and any local drafts.
  • Search public archives and search‑engine caches for snapshots of blog pages (archival services and caches sometimes have copies even when a host does not).
  • Consider consulting counsel before pursuing forced disclosure; legal remedies and requirements vary by jurisdiction.

Notes for hosts and operators: implement a clear takedown and preservation workflow that requires documented legal process before permanent deletion, maintain regular off‑site backups of user data, and log all law‑enforcement requests with timestamps and responsible contact names (when allowed). Transparency statements to affected users — even limited ones — reduce confusion and reputational damage.

A final caution: reposting or mirroring instructions for illegal acts creates legal and safety risks. Claims about specific files or publications should be verified against authoritative sources before amplification. When dispute or loss involves private data or property, preservation of evidence and timely legal advice are the most practical protections.

Major Variola 0 Newbie Poster

The Inspire magazine is all that was present. It has a "hit list" associated
with the Mohommad cartoons, and pipe bombs from matchheads (chlorate) and sugar.
Also bin Laden on global warming.

If you haven't examined the mag first hand, do so. Its fascinating.
Check out the "sneakers" page for US blacks.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.