Member Avatar for iSrchNkd

We currently are protecting those people that don't want to give up their information and location like when you search on other search engines. Does anyone think this is value to people. Privacy is a right and that is something we are fighting for. I would appreciate some feedback.:)

  • 3 Contributors
  • 2 Replies
  • 96 Views
  • 14 Hours Discussion Span
  • Latest Post Latest Post by bobchrist

Dani AI

Generated

highlighted a clear user need: many people expect searches to behave without leaking identity or precise location. Posts from and reflect two common reactions — that location is not sensitive, and that ad systems tied to accounts are the main worry. Both are relevant, but treating location and persistent identifiers as sensitive by default is a defensible technical and business position: query text, IPs, cookies, and account links can all be used to profile or re-identify a person, and that risk drives demand for privacy-first search.

Practical recommendations for a privacy-respecting search service:

  • Minimize what is collected. Avoid tying queries to stable account identifiers unless explicitly opted in. Truncate or hash IPs at ingestion and keep retention windows short.
  • Ask for location only when needed. Use explicit opt-in for browser geolocation and offer a manual location override rather than inferring from IP.
  • Eliminate third-party trackers and advertising pixels on search pages. Consider contextual ads instead of profiling-based ads and make ad personalization opt-in.
  • Make data controls obvious. Publish a concise retention policy, provide simple delete/export functions, and log access for audits.
  • Protect transport and metadata. Enforce HTTPS, set conservative Referrer-Policy headers, and avoid embedding external resources that leak referers.
  • Use aggregate, privacy-preserving analytics. When reporting usage, apply anonymization or differential-privacy techniques so individual queries cannot be reconstructed.
  • Align with regulation and transparency. Data minimization and clear user rights are required in many jurisdictions (for example, under EU data-protection law), so document lawful bases and user-facing disclosures.

A caution: privacy choices trade off with personalization and some ad revenue. Framing privacy as a product differentiator and offering clear opt-ins for higher-personalization features can recover value while preserving a strong default for users who prefer anonymity.

Recommended Answers

All 2 Replies

Member Avatar for Ancient Dragon

people who don't want their location known should not use the internet. anyone that parinoid should keep their head. Giving out critical personal information such as SSAN, banking and credit account numbers, etc is certainly illegal. But I don't see the harm in knowing what city someone is at.

Member Avatar for bobchrist

I think No one would be interested for displaying ads keyed to words in their mail and the search being tracked through email address.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.