Dead Internet Theory: Is the Web Dying?

Johannes C. 1 Tallied Votes 555 Views Share

In 2024, over half of all internet traffic is generated by bots. For human users, it is increasingly challenging to tell what's real and what's not. These developments breath new life into the Dead Internet Theory. Have we, in our quest for clicks, killed the web?


If you've been on social media lately, you might have noticed a surge in content that is clearly generated by AI becoming viral—examples include sand- and bottle-sculptures, tiny houses, celebrities, and, of course, Jesus Christ. The community at r/ChatGPT on Reddit seems particularly captivated by this trend, with memes making fun about the 'boomers on Facebook' who fall for these fake images dominating the subreddit for weeks. Ironically, even the tech-savvy users on Reddit sometimes fail to distinguish between real and manipulated content. For example, one user reposted a photo of an olive tree that looks like it has a face, assuming it was AI-generated or at least photoshopped, and mocked the gullible people who took it for real. However, it turns out that both the photo and the tree are genuine. You can find the tree in Puglia, Italy, and pictures of it from various angles had already gone viral long before AI image generation was sophisticated enough to deceive us gullible h00mans.

However, the ease with which posts like 'My son built a spaceship out of plastic bottles' gain massive attention and engagement is alarming. The comments on such posts are also worth looking into, as most of them could have been lifted straight from a spambot's database.

So, are we now stuck in a cycle where bots create content, upload it to fake profiles, and then other bots engage with it until it inevitably pops up in everyone's feeds?
It's starting to look like it.

Dead Internet Theory Reborn

These observations support the Dead Internet Theory, a conspiracy theory suggesting that the internet has become so dominated by bots, manipulated algorithms, and automatically generated content that it is mostly devoid of human presence and, therefore, dead.

To be fair, the theory is not brand-new. It first appeared on message boards in the mid- to late 2010s and has only become more widespread in recent years. While humans obviously still participate on the internet (this is written by someone with opposable thumbs – I swear), Dead Internet has gained traction with the increasing capabilities of AI and LLMs producing more content every day.

The rise of robots is undeniable, in 2023, 49.6% of internet traffic came from bots. Considering the trendline, we can safely assume that 2024 will be the first year where robots account for more than half of all internet traffic.

Of course, content monetization and spam have long been a problem affecting the quality of search results. But LLMs have made it easier than ever to generate low-quality content. This coincides with high centralization, where today’s internet is organized around big platforms that use opaque algorithms to determine what we see and what we don't. Thus, while the internet is not truly dead, it has undoubtedly lost many of its good qualities. Twenty years ago, it was a place where nerds went to get and give advice. Today, everything is monetized, centralized, and automated... If these trends continue, the web might indeed become so degraded that it might die just as well.

SEO in a Dead Internet

The rise of generated content has a bazillion of implications. To keep it concise and stick to my area of expertise, let us now briefly discuss the main challenges for Search Engine Optimization (SEO) today.

The world of SEO has always evolved faster than most other industries. However, we have witnessed some developments that might be irreversible. Due to the centralization on major networks like Facebook, X, and TikTok, we've seen a significant drop in referral traffic. Nowadays, few users actively check any pages offsite the big platforms. Even the largest news sites struggle to attract views if their articles don’t perform well on social media, which only provides fleeting traffic bursts. Additionally, social media platforms use algorithms designed to keep users engaged on-site, making it much harder for content with outbound links to go viral. As a result, search engines remain the only reliable source of unpaid, long-term traffic acquisition. Unsurprisingly, this market is also heavily centralized, with countless businesses' fortunes tied closely to the moods of Google's algorithm.

The rise of AI-generated content, increased bot traffic, and exploitable algorithms present SEO experts with opportunities as well as uncertainties. This year, Google has already introduced two core updates to its search engine, aimed at reducing the visibility of AI-generated content. From my testing with search queries and analyzing somewhat erratic analytics and search console data, so far it appears that the visibility of low-quality AI articles may have increased instead. I might be wrong here, but I still encounter many top search results that are clearly poorly crafted AI pieces and should not be featured on the first page of Google under any circumstances. If your experiences differ, please feel free to share them.

Reanimation Efforts

So, what can we do to prevent the web from dying? In my view, any reanimation efforts must be grounded in the belief that the internet is only as good as the content we create. AI and bots only function based on human instructions. To counter the surge of automatically generated and bot-distributed content, we must dig deep into our creativity and leverage all our expertise. Whether we use AI assistance or not, as content creators, we must always prioritize quality over quantity and—cross your fingers—hope that the almighty algorithm works in our favor.

Above all, to rescue the internet from being completely dominated by bots, we need to stay authentic, engage genuinely, seek information beyond the major platforms, and continuously strive to differentiate ourselves from the increasingly sophisticated bot army. You can take the first step now! Prove you’re not a robot and leave a comment below ;)

m_624 0 Newbie Poster

"Dead Internet Theory" is an idea that says the internet is becoming less genuine and less alive. Here's a simple explanation:

The theory suggests that:

Bots and Fake Content: A lot of what we see online is created by bots or automated programs, not real people. This includes social media posts, comments, and even articles.

Controlled Information: Big companies and governments might be controlling what we see and read online, making the internet feel less free and open.

Less Interaction: People are not interacting as much as they used to. Instead, we're just consuming content that's often made by these bots or controlled sources.

So, in essence, the "Dead Internet Theory" is about the fear that the internet is losing its authenticity and becoming a place filled with fake or manipulated content rather than real interactions between people.

commented: Thank you, ChatGPT xD +0
Reverend Jim 4,780 Hi, I'm Jim, one of DaniWeb's moderators. Moderator Featured Poster

Seems like an extension of Sturgeon's Law which states "90% of everything is crap".

Nina0X 0 Newbie Poster

So, what can we do to prevent the web from dying? I guess web3 is the answer! If the technology enables then the internet should not only be used for connecting and sharing some kitties! The whole of humanity's wealth will be held on the Internet..

rproffitt commented: Don't look at It's great for the scammers? +0
pcbugfixer 13 Old Dog - New Tricks

I believe it is.
With AI involved and the misleading and duplicate information tells me that the WWW is corrupt and becoming useless.
And it is the Spammers, Hackers and the like that did it.
Time will tell

m_624 0 Newbie Poster

The Dead Internet Theory suggests that the internet is dying or already dead due to the prevalence of bots and automated content. However, the internet continues to grow and evolve, remaining a vital part of modern life.

stuwer12 0 Newbie Poster

This theme needs development, but I'm connected with a blockchain group who have what we call web 4.0, totally independent ,totally peer to peer with no outside interference or involvement
Don't know if it would bring back relevancy to search, but connections are true
blckcerts (or blockcertsai
anyone interested ,;et me know and I'll send you a connection link

wwwalker 49 Newbie Poster

About 40% of hits to my site are bots with some trying to find exploits on my site to hack it and use it to propagate spam. Very few humans are surfing the Web any more. iptables firewall has to be used to block the hackers.

Reverend Jim 4,780 Hi, I'm Jim, one of DaniWeb's moderators. Moderator Featured Poster

Very few humans are surfing the Web any more

I disagree. Just because the number of bots has grown exponentially relative to the number of meat-based surfers does not mean that very few humans are still surfing. Consider how much spam e-mail is sent every minute. That does not mean e-mail is dying.

Johannes C. commented: True. Although one could argue that "surfing" mostly became "scrolling" (on centralized platforms) +0
Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.