The election is over and it looks like fear loses, at least for now. Our former Conservative government, led by Stephen Harper, went down in flames to the Liberals, led by Justin Trudeau. Thus ends a decade of Conservative rule that was slowly turning Canada into the US. One of Trudeau's campaign promises was to replace Canada's first-past-the-post electoral system with some sort of proportional voting. This would prevent what has so frequently happened - a splitting of the left/central vote between the Liberals and the NDP (social democrats) allowing the Conservatives to win (sometimes big) with less than 50% of the votes. There were other promises but this is the one I want to see fulfilled first.

Dani AI

Generated

raised the core issue: first‑past‑the‑post creates the very seat/vote distortions that drive calls for reform. Ottawa did convene an all‑party committee and ran the MyDemocracy.ca consultation, but the federal drive stalled and the government publicly stepped back from replacing FPTP in early 2017. (ourcommons.ca)

The committee (ERRE) produced a detailed report in December 2016 recommending principles and a path — including a referendum — and the MyDemocracy exercise drew large participation while also attracting scrutiny on design and privacy. That process left no single replacement chosen, which the government cited when it removed electoral change from its ministerial mandate. (ourcommons.ca)

What the alternatives actually do: mixed‑member proportional (MMP) mixes district winners with compensatory list seats to match party vote shares; single transferable vote (STV) uses multi‑member districts and ranked ballots so votes transfer until seats are filled. Each reduces “false majorities” but brings tradeoffs: more proportionality, different coalition dynamics, and important technical choices (district magnitude, list rules, thresholds) that determine outcomes. For clear, compact descriptions see Elections Canada and comparative summaries of MMP/STV mechanics. (elections.ca)

Practical lesson from the thread (and from provincial experience): reform is technical and political. British Columbia (2018) and Prince Edward Island (2019) both considered proportional options and voters chose to keep FPTP or produced non‑binding results — showing that clear single questions, public education, and pilot or provincial routes matter more than broad promises. Groups focused on specific, easy‑to‑understand models and sample ballots have the best chance of moving things forward; otherwise the status quo favors parties that win on geography. For provincial examples and official results see Elections BC and Elections PEI. (en.wikipedia.org)

Notes tied to the thread: ’s observation about “40% majorities” is a real structural effect; ’s UK example shows why strategic voting and concentrated regional support matter. If the first priority is avoiding misleading seat majorities, campaigns should concentrate on a single, well‑explained model (often MMP) and a binding referendum question — not a diffuse consultation.

Recommended Answers

All 6 Replies

Member Avatar for Member #120589

Not knowing much on Canadian politics, but can sympathize with the unfairness of the FPTP system. We still have it in the UK Parliament, although the Welsh Government has a PR element attached. Mind you, in the grand scheme of things wrt UK systems, it's pretty moot, as national views cannot be represented when one country has a huge majority of seats compared to all the other countries put together.

All that said, we have a pretty horrible right-wing party called UKIP which won about 13% of the total electorate vote and only got 1 seat, compared to the Conservatives (winners) with 36% and 331 seats. Sometimes we have to be careful what we wish for! But, democracy is not served by FPTP.

Our problem is/was that we have one right-wing party (Conservatives) and two alternatives jockeying for the middle/left. In typical fashion, all the Conservatives have to do is see the vote split between the other two. Theoretically, if every riding split 33-33-34 with the 34 going to the right, they could take all of the seats with only 34% of the vote. We have had Conservative majorities where they received less than 50%.

We have had Conservative majorities where they received less than 50%.

Most majority governments in Canada are based on far less than 50% popular support. Indeed the journalists' rule of thumb is that 40% popular vote will get you a majority gov't in Canada. Though recently there have been several majorities based on 38-40% of the popular vote.

The UK system is double fucked because the national gov't is also the regional gov't for England where as Scotland, Wales & NIreland have separate regional gov't PLUS the House of Lords is an obscene old-boys club for party donors/former MP with way more members than other countries' equivalents (no limit on number of members) and no regional representation.

Member Avatar for Member #120589

Yep. UK system is doomed to fail. Can.t come too early for me. Shake off the yoke of foreign governance which even pollutes regional politics. The lack of democracy in UK politics would be laughable if it wasn.t so tragic. It.ll be interesting when we have the EU vote. If the biggest country votes to leave but the other three vote to stay. He he, we may all be forced to leave. Then see fireworks.

If England votes to leave the UK then my money is on Scotland leaving the UK. 'Course it would also be a beaucratic nightmare for the UK to leave the EU because there are tons of EU citizens working in the UK who would have to be given some kind of work-visa plus lots of universities & research institutes have EU grants and EU funded student which would be a massive headache to deal with. At least in the short term leaving the EU will be very expensive.

Member Avatar for Member #120589

Well, all the more excuse for them to eject Johnny Foreigner and close down the borders. Wonder how many people would have to return home from the continent. Probably more than would be chucked out of the UK. Then you'd have a country full of people who don't want to be there. Heh heh. Hilarious.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.