New Survey Tries to Sell Reasons Why Female IT Workers Are Unhappy, But I'm Not Buying

Lisa Hoover 0 Tallied Votes 543 Views Share

I'm probably a disgrace to my gender for saying this but I think the new study showing women in IT face "significant barriers to advancement" is a bit overblown. According to research conducted by the Anita Borg Institute for Women and Technology, the situation is so bad that nearly 30% of women are planning to leave their mid-level tech positions within the next year to "pursue alternative options."

The study makes a number of assertions that seem to lay the blame for unhappy female tech workers at the feet of businesses without looking at all possible factors. For instance:

  • Researchers say women are more likely than men to view the workplace as a competitive environment. News flash: women are competitive, period. Ever been to a class reunion or cocktail party with one?
  • The study claims technical women who hold management positions are perceived as less competent than their male colleagues. What the researchers gloss over, however, it that fewer women in IT have advanced technical degrees. In fact, the study says outright, "although the majority of women come to a technical career through studies in computer science and engineering (63.2%), a significant proportion of women come to a technical career from other fields of study." Therefore it's pretty likely that if women are perceived as "less" anything, it's that they lack education (which, comparatively speaking, they do), not competence.
  • Mid-level female managers say they believe long hours are a requirement for success (Last time I checked, long hours for IT workers are par for the course in this field, no matter what your gender.
  • Researchers claim a female tech worker's health is affected by job stress to a greater degree than her male counterpart. While it's true women suffer stress related illness, it's is based on a number of physiological factors and environmental factors and it's not unique to IT.

While I don't agree with the study's conclusions, the researchers do make a couple of good points. The say, for example, "One way companies can demonstrate their commitment to diversity is to increase the female representation on their board of directors and other leadership entities." Researchers also suggest businesses offer greater options for professional development and consider more flexible work schedules to accommodate working parents.

I've worked in male dominated fields and I know it's not easy. I know there are many obstacles to overcome and I'm also aware that plenty of women find themselves in untenable situations. It might help to remember, though, that these kids of work situations are just as tough for men to adapt to so a little understanding all the way around is usually called for.

I had hoped for a better study from an organization who's mission is to "help industry, academia, and government recruit, retain, and develop women leaders in high-tech fields, resulting in higher levels of technological innovation." I was disappointed.

Dani AI

Generated

Reasonable skepticism is healthy. is right to push back when a single study gets framed as a universal verdict — surveys can highlight problems, but their headlines depend heavily on who was asked, how questions were worded, and what controls were used. That doesn't automatically make the findings wrong, but it does mean the report should be read alongside method details and local context before leaping to conclusions.

When evaluating workplace research, look for a few practical signs of rigor: clear sampling and response rates; controls for role, tenure, hours, education, and parental status; whether outcomes are perceptions or objective measures; and whether analyses separate managers from individual contributors. Cross-sectional snapshots can suggest patterns but not causes, and survey wording often shapes answers more than readers realize.

If the goal is to reduce turnover and improve equity, combine individual and organizational actions. For managers and HR, practical steps include: run regular anonymous engagement and exit surveys and share results; publish transparent promotion criteria and timelines; create formal sponsorship programs (not just mentorship); perform pay and promotion audits by level; and offer flexible, measurable work arrangements. For individual contributors: document accomplishments, seek sponsors as well as mentors, ask for clear promotion criteria, pick projects that increase visibility, and budget time each quarter for skill refresh.

Experiences vary by company and team — as notes, culture differs widely — and attitude matters too, as says. Both individual agency and structural change matter. Use any survey as a starting point: interrogate the methods, compare with local data, and prioritize concrete, measurable fixes rather than broad, blame-based narratives.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

I think it's funny that the name of the person who conducted the study is Anita Borg. Maybe it's just me.
If it's any consolation, where I work, and you know where that is--there are so many women in power positions that some refer to it as the "vaginocracy." So it may be just where some women find themselves and not the whole industry.

ravishankarkota 0 Newbie Poster

I believe that attitude matters, not gender.There are so many happy female employees in great positions.Those who love their work will definitely reach the top positions.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.