Latest Cloud-based Apps Posts

Rahul, do you mean a mobile app for iPhone or Android? Wordpress can build some incredibly powerful web apps.

Do you need someone or company to provide quote and develop it?

I would recommend Wordpress.

In a company you put forward the idea and site plan. A new to all this web maker could easily stumble and make a site with security or other issues. For example said PDFs could be something the company doesn't want exposed to the world.
So back to your IT and company leaders to work out the details, and do it right the first time.

I need to create an app for the employees in my department. The app should have four sections on the homepage.
First is the collection of company guidelines/instructions (various documents in pdf format in one place)
second is the various templates/formats used by the employees (again in pdf format)
third is the collection of educational resources in images, pdf or video form
fourth is the forum with contact details of all employees pertaining to the department across the country so as to facilitate discussion and sharing

How do I go about it? Any good app builder website. Seeking suggestions/guidance.

As for me, Copyleaks offers a simple-to-use AI-content detector on their website.

... And, oh well:

As of July 20, 2023, the AI classifier is no longer available due to its low rate of accuracy. We are working to incorporate feedback and are currently researching more effective provenance techniques for text, and have made a commitment to develop and deploy mechanisms that enable users to understand if audio or visual content is AI-generated.

Woot! Woot!

https://openai.com/blog/new-ai-classifier-for-indicating-ai-written-text

I realize that moderating Facebook posts is an exponentially greater task than moderating Daniweb, but if Facebook is not doing its job now, what happens once the election cycle heats up and untold thousands of AI posts created by bots start flooding the ecosphere?

How will US law enforcement react (or not) into AI usage by users in internet platforms we will all going to find soon (in this election cycle). Not only doctored AI images and videos for political gains , but also if you have a sheer number of posts from AI users that seemingly use different language style and have different audiences supporting a political party or opinion , even if the words aren't offensive they create a false narrative affecting the democratic process.

In my country that maybe happens in few years , but when you ask now anything a LLM in my native language you probably doing it to have a big lough with the apparent ridiculous translation of the answer from English that happens (not really) behind the scenes.

As for the EU AI Act I could hope that the implementation of it will target interacting with AI without knowing it and news / opinion articles. That would be great , but as I have seen with GDPR the implementation is always broad and vague enough to target the medium / small companies leaving the big ones almost unaffected. We will see ...

I wonder how this will apply to individuals who use AI to generate, then post content? It's even more problematic in the US. Take this scenario...

If I have a party in my house, and while at that party, some people use the opportunity to sell illegal drugs, I can be charged since the illegal activity is taking place in my house.

Likewise, if a newspaper publishes lies, even those made by freelance journalists or people submitting letters to the editor, as long as that material is published in the newspaprer, the publisher can be held liabel.

But a special exemption was made in the 1990s (under Bill Clinton) which exempted internet hosted agencies. Under that exemption, Facebook, Twitter, etc. are not responsible for libelous content.

Here at Daniweb we moderate posts and remove those posts which are blatantly false, or even in some cases not false but overly nasty in tone. We do this to maintain a certain standard but apparently there is no legal requirement to do so.

Thank you for your reply. Unfortunately, I've used quite a handful of those AI detection APIs to no avail. They also often catch false positives, which is perhaps even more so detrimental to my use case.

There are some apps that claim to detect AI Generated content and have paid APIs (e.g. GPTZero , Originality) , I haven't use them except of testing , I didn't had any good reason and furthermore the landscape is changing so fast that all the statistical patterns they might detect need better and better adjustment to work decently.

We still can detect as humans most of generated by AI texts but as things move forward that will become tougher but still feasible (even when we will have artificial super intelligence (ASI) the way we think as humans will always be different). I understand the need in forums like Daniweb to automatically detect AI generated posts and in these cases maybe one of the detectors APIs will work for you.

In EU we have the AI Act , that when implemented will require when ever you use AI (in images or texts) to inform the final user (this goes far from watermarking the content or the image with some unnoticeable by real humans technique). If this will implemented as it sounds will be one more ridiculous thing that medium and small EU tech businesses will have to do , while the bigger ones (having many lawyers) will declare that this doesn't apply to them (as have done with GDPR). Of course minimizing innovation and competition in favor of big companies.

I have heard of some proposals to include watermarking techniques in AI generated texts but I don't know anyone …

I’ve been working on DaniWeb all day.

Your response to my last post.

What was fast?

Well, I think what they mean is that the writing does not have a soul behind it. ;)

I recall reading, "If the text is unusually coherent or consistent, it might raise suspicion."

I'm afraid that does not speak well of our educational system. And it's not very useful in trying to automate detection.

As a side note, I read recently about some researchers using a "needle in a haystack" test on an AI. They buried an anomalous question about pizza in with a bunch of physics questions. The AI pointed out the anomaly along with the question, "Was this inserted to test me?"

As the question states, is there a reliable way of detecting AI content? I vaguely recall OpenAI announcing something a long time ago that they were going to release something that says whether content was generated via ChatGPT, or am I misremembering?

Hmm ... in retrospect, it seems that only form fields are masked. I think MS Clarity might just not be willing to decipher what users type into form fields.

Under Settings, I have the Masking mode set to "Relaxed". It says that means that no text is masked, but that's definitely not the case. It says changes may take up to an hour to appear, but I've waited 24 hours now. I'm still seeing masked text. If "Relaxed" actually means light masking (versus no masking), then they should remove the caption that says that no text is masked.

For a cloud-based HRMS (Human Resource Management System) platform, consider the following suggestions:

Mobile Accessibility:
Provide mobile access for on-the-go HR tasks, enabling users to manage HR processes from anywhere.

Integration Capabilities:
Support seamless integration with other enterprise systems (e.g., payroll, attendance) and third-party applications.

Comprehensive HR Modules:
Allow customization to adapt the HRMS to the specific needs and policies of each organization.

Audit Trails:
Maintain detailed audit trails for all HR activities to track changes and ensure accountability.

Cost-Effective:
Optimize cost by choosing a scalable pricing model that aligns with the organization's size and usage.

Continuous Updates:
Regularly update the platform with new features, security patches, and improvements.

Training and Support:
Provide comprehensive training resources and support to help users make the most of the HRMS platform.

Data Backup and Recovery:
Implement robust data backup and recovery mechanisms to prevent data loss in case of unexpected events.

Feedback Mechanism:
Incorporate a feedback mechanism to gather input from HR users and continuously improve the platform based on their needs.

Vendor Reputation:
Choose a reputable and reliable cloud service provider with a track record of security and reliability in hosting HRMS solutions.
Consider these aspects to create a cloud-based HRMS platform that meets the needs of modern organizations efficiently.

Linting is going smoothly because we are using the super-linter docker image on the Microsoft-hosted Azure DevOps agent. However, we must export these logs outside the agent and prepare the output of the super-linter execution.

We'll attempt to make a dashboard for the problems that the linter is looking for.

Is there a way to accomplish this?

I found such to be loved by those that micro-manage. It can and has resulted in lower productivity because you spend time tracking time rather than working on the projects.

Look at this way. You get paid by the hour so if this makes the job take longer you get paid more. But don't tell the boss that!

Hello anyone? Does anyone track time? My new project manager requires our team to track time and this is the first time this is happening to us. We are about to use TMetric app. Can you share your experience?

I use all what folk and you have mentioned except Siri. I revealed why I had to forget about Apple and their products before but that's not important right now (nod to Leslie Nelson.)

It seems odd to read that Siri don't actually work. I've seen it do fine but as with any of these tools, none or 100% of what folk expect.

As to the 2021 data cutoff for GPT 3.5, that's not a big deal because it's not a search engine as defined by Google. It's something else entirely and quite useful. At some point I'll have a short explanation of what GPT 3.5 and 4.0 is but the one thing it is not is a search engine.

Not really but Microsoft and Google owns chatbot and voice search apart from that I don't have any idea if any developer had created likewise. Google assistant normally recognized phonetics of sounds into it query database only if the word and pronunciation tally with dictionary phonetics, oxford, macmillan, and others if new words are published it supposed to be publish in these search feeds before it could be recognized by the search engines.

Remember that ChatGPT has no real time connection with anything, it only knows that data was loaded into its database, which is a very selective dataset that is several years old.
That's part of the reason for all the disclaimers on not using it for financial advise, any advise you would get would of necessity be years out of date.

Siri, which just interfaces with existing search engines after using a speech to text algorithm to turn your voice input into a text string for an existing search engine (and I guess Google assistant and Alexa do the same thing) are far better suited for task. More isn't even needed, separation of concerns is in place.
You could probably make something that'd use a voice to text system to feed input to chatGPT but would purpose would it serve? ChatGPT is just a toy, a proof of concept and marketing tool for its creator. And a major annoyance for places like Stackoverflow that now have to contest with fools using it to create silly "questions" and "answers" the poison the site.

Dave Bowman said "I'm already there." - Space Odyssey: 2010

Search for "How to use ChatGPT with Siri" and you can try it out. It might not be GPT 4 yet which is sort of a big deal.

All this hoopla around ChatGPT and AI got me thinking about voice search. Has anyone created a version of Siri that actually works? (And, no, Google Assistant and Alexa don't really count. Google Assistant has never answered a single thing for me.) What about Cortana now that Microsoft owns a stake in ChatGPT?