0

Is {(1,1), (2,2), (3,3)} symmetric? transitive? Yes! Yes!

Why is R = {(1,2), (2,3), (1,3), (2,1)} not transitive? Because (1,1) and (2,2) are missing.

##
#

4
Contributors
3
Replies
20
Views
2 Years
Discussion Span
Last Post by sepp2k
0

Umm.. where does the "discrete" part of this question come into play?

Also, I wouldn't call the matrix symmetric. When I think of symmetric matrices, I think in terms of N x N (i.e. - square matrices.) The system you post is 3 x 2, three rows by two columns, which is not square.

0

Is {(1,1), (2,2), (3,3)} symmetric? transitive? Yes! Yes!

Obviously I'm not your grader, but I'd expect that you need to give some explanation along with your answers to get a full score. Other than that you are correct.

Why is R = {(1,2), (2,3), (1,3), (2,1)} not transitive? Because (1,1) and (2,2) are missing.

Again, the answer would be better if you explained why those would be needed for it to be transitive, but is otherwise correct.

So, is there a question here? Or are you just showing off?

The question's in the title (which admittedly is bad style): "Is this correct or not"

Also, I wouldn't call the matrix symmetric

It's not a matrix, it's a set of pairs that represents a relation.

This topic has been dead for over six months. Start a new discussion instead.
Have something to contribute to this discussion? Please be thoughtful, detailed and courteous, and be sure to adhere to our posting rules.