Member Avatar for Phillip_3

HI GUYS HOW ARE YOU I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF YOU GUYS CAN HELP WITH A SOFTWARE SYSTEM THAT IS ABLE TO TAP INTO HUMAN

consciousness
  • 4 Contributors
  • 7 Replies
  • 206 Views
  • 4 Hours Discussion Span
  • Latest Post Latest Post by Suzie999

Dani AI

Generated

A short expert note that clarifies and reframes this thread.

“Consciousness” is not a single engineering target but a cluster of philosophical and scientific concepts (phenomenal vs. access vs. narrative consciousness). As observed, philosophers and neuroscientists do not agree on a single definition or mechanism, so “tapping into consciousness” needs a precise restatement before any engineering work can begin. See authoritative overviews for why the term is contested. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Consciousness Britannica: Consciousness

For practical progress, reframe the ambition into a measurable engineering problem. Possible, well-scoped targets include: a conversational agent, intent or sentiment classification, a predictive behavior model, or (with the right hardware and approvals) a brain-computer-interface experiment. ’s AIML fragment illustrates a rule-based chatbot approach; modern practice favors pretrained neural models and transfer learning. Common, well-supported tool choices are Python + PyTorch for model work, Hugging Face Transformers for pretrained models and pipelines, or the OpenAI platform for rapid prototyping. PyTorch Hugging Face — Transformers OpenAI Platform — Docs

Concrete first steps that lead to useful answers: (1) state one clear hypothesis and a measurable metric (accuracy, F1, task success, etc.), (2) choose or collect a small, consented dataset, (3) prototype with a pretrained pipeline before attempting training from scratch, (4) run reproducible experiments and track results, and (5) document ethics/data-consent and any safety mitigations. Using these steps turns a vague claim into something engineers and researchers can test and critique. Hugging Face — Getting started OpenAI — safety & deployment notes

A final practical note echoing : vague, all-caps posts with no success criteria rarely attract sustained help. Clear scope, sample data, compute limits, and the specific question needed (design, code, dataset, or evaluation) will produce far more constructive responses.

Recommended Answers

All 7 Replies

Member Avatar for Suzie999

Define Conciousness.

Member Avatar for rproffitt

I heard a debate that Facebook somehow tapped into human consciousness. Then again, now I'm hearing that is for old people.

Member Avatar for Suzie999

I'll get you started.

public interface IBrainInterface
    {
        void TapIntoConciousness(object FromTheFuture);
    }
commented: Unsure if want the public interface here. See Microsoft's AI when exposed to public. +8
Member Avatar for Phillip_3

AI, AGI, ASI, Deep Learning, Intelligent it can be done we might be a bit behind if we can do this here together we can i do it i dont know which platform to start with.

Member Avatar for AssertNull

Phillip,

I hope you aren't expecting to get any serious answers here. You're posting in all-caps with a very vague description of some project involving human consciousness/artificial intelligence. Pretty complicated stuff. You're doing this on a forum with a bunch of strangers that you've never met. Your only other post besides this thread was ten months ago where you posted, again in all-caps, a very basic question comparitvely, with no follow through on your part.

https://www.daniweb.com/programming/software-development/threads/496185/discount

Assuming you are not trolling, you need to post WAY more details than you have to get real responses.

commented: i understand your concern an no am not trolling and am also not afraid that everyone gets involved i want to see where it goes +0
Member Avatar for Phillip_3

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<aiml version="1.0.1" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<category>
<pattern> HELLO WORLD </pattern>
<template>
Hello User
</template>
</category>
</aiml>

Member Avatar for Suzie999

This has to be trolling, I'm no philosopher but I've read and thought about it enough to know that humans don't even know what consiousness is. There are solid arguments that it does not even reside in the brain.

Anyone evolved enough to be serious about "tapping into human consiousness" with binary software needs to be writing papers about it, not asking people to help them above a C# tag.

Be a part of the DaniWeb community

We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.