0

"Give us a call! We are on your side (collecting your cash while you suffer on the streets)"

0

"Sir, do you know why we stopped you?"
"No."
"You, sir, were speeding."
"Impossible."

Edited by Lucaci Andrew

0

The Fiscal Cliff is solved.

Or:

There is a Santa Claus after all.

Edited by Ene Uran

0

"but we can still stay friends"
and, of course, the classical combination of:
"yes", "no", and ".... maybe", should be clear to every married man :D

0

"It's all about job satisfaction"

0

ban weapons will stop crime and murders.

Try reduce :)

0

Clearly, any mention of banning certain weapons brings the expected response from those taking a specific interpretion of the second amendment. I am assuming that these people would agree that allowing private citizens to possess and freely carry stinger missiles and grenade launchers would be outside the second amendment guidelines and clearly not in the public interest. Given that, where would they agree is a reasonable place to draw the line between the public's right to safety and the public's right to bear arms?

This topic has been dead for over six months. Start a new discussion instead.
Have something to contribute to this discussion? Please be thoughtful, detailed and courteous, and be sure to adhere to our posting rules.